at least you've done one right thing in calling the KJB the KJV .
But that's it, but you still need to put the Holy Bible before the KJV and Niv
So are you denying the differences, or you just don't care?
at least you've done one right thing in calling the KJB the KJV .
But that's it, but you still need to put the Holy Bible before the KJV and Niv
explain what difference is here then go on I'm listeningSo are you denying the differences, or you just don't care?
Diddo.
And "Ditto" for everyone else .it's Dido for you
Honest curiosity: why does “KJB” bother you when “KJV” doesn’t?at least you've done one right thing in calling the KJB the KJV .
I can just about live with the title KJv.Honest curiosity: why does “KJB” bother you when “KJV” doesn’t?
I've said it to many others, I might as well say it to you:
If all you do is compare the KJV to the NIV (or to any other translation), all you can demonstrate is that there are differences. You can't prove that either is correct, you can't prove that either is corrupted, you can't prove anything other than the existence of differences.
To claim anything beyond that is to assume a whole lot that you haven't actually stated, and even if you do state what you left out, the burden is on you to support your assertions with evidence.
No, it means the KJV includes it and the NIV doesn't. You haven't demonstrated with independent evidence that this belongs in the Bible.
You're welcome to your belief, but I disagree; I think that misuse of the available Scripture does far more damage. The SDA's, Mormons, JW's, and other aberrant groups didn't start with "corrupted Bibles" but with mishandling of the Bible they had.
It's the same problem with many "preachers" today.
you say so, but your actually taking to king of scrupulous scorpionsI see you know a little about the Jehovah's Witnesses. They used a King James until 1951, and because their doctrines were crushed by the reading of the K.J.B. the decided to write their own. They thrive on the A. and B. text.
Why doesn't it concern you and others that there is so much confusion in basic doctrinal teachings? Look, all I'm doing is sharing information. Maybe you don't care, and that's fine with me. Use any Bible you wish but beware of God's warning in Revelation 18:18-21. The church today reminds me of a piece of paper that's been run through a shredder, and that concerns me.
The Muslims also disparage (even by killing them) people who have corrupted their scriptures.
The same spirit is at work within the KJV-only crowd.
Any way, here's a KJV quote "But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire."
I'm so glad that being a son of God is not a cognitive exercise but, rather, a function of the Holy Spirit living within us. That way a certain KJV Bible, ultimately commissioned because a man banged another woman who was not his wife and got her pregnant and the Roman Pope would not give the man a right of divorce, does not get the final say in the judgment of our souls. That is reserved for the Living God, Christ, alone.
you say so, but your actually taking to king of scrupulous scorpionswell I hope thats hus star sign anyway. No pun intended, as I appreciate his insights.
But you're remind me someone that only wants to hear what they want to.
There's another song for that
But first let's have some real messages
Your comments are so ridiculous, there ludicrous.
Since the OP did not cite any alleged evidence for the corruption of modern translations, the burden of proof is on him.Actually the proof that the NIV and all modern translations are corrupt has been well-document and established. So the burden of proof is on you that the only thing that has been proved are differences.
One can hope.yes but will he listen![]()
Since the OP did not cite any alleged evidence for the corruption of modern translations, the burden of proof is on him.
if you cared about this sentiment, you would of answered post 22 and ended this ridiculous charadeSo, what's your motto, "let there be sorrow at someone else’s expense!"
As if the KJ does not add or subtract words? LOLUse any Bible you wish but beware of God's warning in Revelation 18:18-21.