If you don’t know fallible humans write then you are very confused.
I'll be praying for you . . .
1 Thessalonians 5:17
Pray without ceasing. ~KJV
If you don’t know fallible humans write then you are very confused.
According to you, all I need is evidence. Are you changing your stance?God/s are repeated figments.
I'll be praying for you . . .
1 Thessalonians 5:17
Pray without ceasing. ~KJV
According to you, all I need is evidence. Are you changing your stance?
Never mind about what is within the cosmos. If you cannot tell us how the cosmos came into existence, then you had better start at that point.Humans have only started to explore the within cosmos.
As we reside within the cosmos. So that’s all we can speak of or investigate.
Actually, my figment created you. He existed long before figments. He just hasn't introduced Himself to you personally. But back to the reality of this thread: did you change your stance on the sufficiency of evidence as proof of existence?There is mountains of evidence God/s are figments. No other God would be talked about or worshipped in any culture/time, if a particular God existed and was in communication with humans. Your particular figment was created by humans in the Middle East.
Never mind about what is within the cosmos. If you cannot tell us how the cosmos came into existence, then you had better start at that point.
That doesn't change what I said.
Actually, my figment created you. He existed long before figments. He just hasn't introduced Himself to you personally. But back to the reality of this thread: did you change your stance on the sufficiency of evidence as proof of existence?
You can see the Biblical record. Why do you deny it?As you can see the fossil record. It’s your failure to acknowledge death existed before humans.
You pretend to know more than others, and deny what we know to be true.... you are just a human within the cosmos. Who has limited knowledge of what even exists. I find it comical we have humans in the world stating they know the particulars of something more.
Humans cannot investigate anything but the cosmos they reside within. That’s why anyone telling you anything beyond it is simply in their imagination.
You're left with a free-willed choice again to accept or reject a non-caused or caused first-mover from the Big Bang.
What's even more comical is people making claims about what reality is while admitting they have partial experience of reality.The reality of the thread is in my first post. It’s actually comical we have humans in the world that simply cannot acknowledge they know nothing more than what resides in the cosmos and what we know of that is minuscule. But here we are with fallible humans who are bound to the cosmos stating they know the particulars of something beyond it. When it only resides in their imagination. Obviously.
What's even more comical is people making claims about what reality is while admitting they have partial experience of reality.
Because when this cosmos was created it was created by .... guess what? By something outside the cosmos. So naturally and reasonably we say that "Something" is outside this cosmos.
Q.E.D.
Next?
You haven’t observed anything created or anything outside. But carry on telling me about your imagination![]()
What's even more comical is people making claims about what reality is while admitting they have partial experience of reality.
So you're telling me that you're blind too? I didn't know that.
We have observed via telescopes in space, a time right after 300 million years after creation. Before that things were smaller and smaller and smaller and before that it was "something" that initiated this whole thing Outside of our universe.
You would know this if you were to choose the correct response on the polls about these questions.
So you simply dodged the question. Therefore you are even more limited than you think.The cosmos is all we know exists and knowledge of what’s within it is limited. But carry on as a limited human that you know something more.