According to the Bible: To be an apostle, you had to have seen the risen Christ. Being an apostle was a part of the spiritual gifts given to the early church. So not all things are for us. They were writing Scripture. Today, we are not still writing Scripture. Unless one wants to join the ranks of Mormons, Muslims, and Catholics, the canon of the Holy Bible is closed. They also can claim to be guided by a spirit that is of truth. But they obviously are in error. Why? Because their belief is contradictory to the Bible. The same is true with Modern Scholarship. I mean really. Modern Textual Critical proponents must duck and dodge at every turn just like the Mormons and Catholics do when they are confronted with Scripture of their odd unbiblical beliefs. I mean, why would your Modern Bible try to hide stuff that makes your side look guilty?
First, 1 Timothy 6:20 changes “Science” to “Knowledge”; Various proponents of Modern Scholarship refer to Textual Criticism as a Science.
Second, in Malachi 2:12, Modern Bibles remove the words “scholar and master” in this verse. This is highly suspicious that two verses that warn us against the very foundation of their belief are removed in their Modern Bibles.
Thirdly, adding to the challenge for Textual Critics, there was a deliberate attempt to mislead by relocating the segment of 1 John 5:8, which reads, “For there are three that testify:” It's shifted to fill the gap in 1 John 5:7, creating the illusion that there's no crucial missing verse. This should immediately raise alarm bells. However, within the Textual Critic community, many might dismiss it with a casual "No cause for concern here, move along," which is worrying. If it were a trivial detail in the Bible that didn't impact doctrine, it might not be as critical, but this directly relates to a fundamental aspect of understanding God's nature.
I could keep going if you like. There is a lot more. This should not exist if the Textual Critic side was true and right.
First, 1 Timothy 6:20 changes “Science” to “Knowledge”; Various proponents of Modern Scholarship refer to Textual Criticism as a Science.
Second, in Malachi 2:12, Modern Bibles remove the words “scholar and master” in this verse. This is highly suspicious that two verses that warn us against the very foundation of their belief are removed in their Modern Bibles.
Thirdly, adding to the challenge for Textual Critics, there was a deliberate attempt to mislead by relocating the segment of 1 John 5:8, which reads, “For there are three that testify:” It's shifted to fill the gap in 1 John 5:7, creating the illusion that there's no crucial missing verse. This should immediately raise alarm bells. However, within the Textual Critic community, many might dismiss it with a casual "No cause for concern here, move along," which is worrying. If it were a trivial detail in the Bible that didn't impact doctrine, it might not be as critical, but this directly relates to a fundamental aspect of understanding God's nature.
I could keep going if you like. There is a lot more. This should not exist if the Textual Critic side was true and right.
