you fixed nothing for me. I said what I meant and knew per (Roman) church history
Weird way to spell "thank you".
Any way. Fixed again.
you fixed nothing for me. I said what I meant and knew per (Roman) church history
Actually, it was because the gentiles had been celebrating pagan holidays because that is all they knew. In order to get them away from paganism, the Apostles, church leaders had to give them a reason to celebrate Jesus the Christ, rather than paganism.... IMO and from what many learned Christians have told me in years past.
Way I see it, those durn pagans had hold of December 25th long enough, so we took their holiday and made it a celebration of the Savior of the World.![]()
You know for a fact it was never documented so God did not intend for it to be revealed. For you to claim you know is pure hogwash.
Surely the Bible would have alluded to this feast if it were so. Therefore this is pure guesswork. And it is generally 4 BC that is regarded as 1 AD.Birth: Feast of Tabernacles 5 BC...
The Romans knew it as well but guess what, none of those you included nor the Romans "wrote" it down on paper. So you are only guessing. How can you act so Pious when it's a complete guessing game and you "can NEVER" know the truth?The following knew the day and time of the birth of the Lord Jesus:
Mary, Joseph, his half brothers and sisters, Anna, Simeon....etc....
So, your conclusion that "God did not intend for it to be revealed" is rather rash...to say the least!
And all the info is there to work it out, and certainly to the timing of it!
The Romans knew it as well but guess what, none of those you included nor the Romans "wrote" it down on paper. So you are only guessing. How can you act so Pious when it's a complete guessing game and you "can NEVER" know the truth?
Surely the Bible would have alluded to this feast if it were so. Therefore this is pure guesswork. And it is generally 4 BC that is regarded as 1 AD.
How can you act so Pious
The quotation below proves you wrong.Prove me wrong!
Christianity was chosen as the Roman State religion because even under harsh, legal, Roman persecution the church grew.
In the exchange for acceptance, however, the church gave up its sovereign calling to represent the King of kings and, instead, chose to support the Roman government.
Religious days, like December 25th, were co-opted by the Roman church and made into Christian holy days.Why do you call it the "roman" church? We are still in IV century. The church split in 1054. Call it the church one, unseparated.
This appeased the majority of the pagan population and the Roman church leadership.
What majority of pagan population? They were in minority. Christianity was winning ground. Didn't you say in the beginning of your comment that Christianity was growing larger and larger? Nobody needed to appease the pagans. I mean... Christians accepted to be tortured in the most gruesome ways rather than bring offerings to the pagan gods, but they just couldn't make up their minds about the holidays so they made a compromise in order to appease the pagans? Do you actually believe this?
With the same agenda, the church repurposed their expensive statues of the pantheon and renamed them to represent figures from the scriptures: the Apostles, Mary, Jesus, etc.
How can you say this stupidity without blushing? Do you take us for little children who know nothing about history, church history and even art history?
What expensive statues have been renamed to represent the apostles, Mary and Jesus? Show me just ONE STATUE of an idol from the Greco-Roman antique world that has survived (i.e. that wasn't destroyed by Christians) and has been "repurposed" to represent figures from the Scripture.
(I bet you will come up with the religious art from the Renaissance)
Pagan buildings were retrofitted with Christian themes yet they retained much of their pagan opulence: colored glass, gold inlays, fine carpeting, expensive robes, etc.
Pagan opulence you say.
These things are really not debatable and are matters of history. Perspective is important.
Yes. Thank you for the enlightenment.
Perhaps we should start with the question: why would a politician call together a religious council?
Answer: It was beneficial to that politician.
![]()
Hmm I think it started when He rose... yet it was a word to make fun of them.. oh that still happens today and we do most of it to our own brothers and sisters.
Christianity wasn't chosen as the Roman State religion. In 313 (Edict of Milan), the Roman emperor Constantine the Great acknowledged Christianity and Christians became tolerated. They were no longer persecuted. It is the emperor Theodosius who declares Christianity as the state religion and forbids paganism.
I don't even know what to make out of this statement. I don't understand how did the church gave up its calling...? If it weren't for the Christian emperors (who are saints in my church) Christians would have remained a sect in the catacombs. These emperors contributed to the spreading of Christianity. We compare Saint Constantine to the Apostles. The European culture begins in 325 A.D., at the ecumenical council of Nicaea, when our creed was written, under the eyes of Constantine. That's a big win for Christianity! Don't you see that? The culture started to revolve around Jesus Christ.