In a West Bank settlement, Israelis tend red cows and plan the Third Temple

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
yeah me too, I think the gaza strip war might be a step forward. in any case apparently there is some space to build a temple on temple mount... there is certainty space to build a tabernacle...there are also digs in a parking lot where the previous temple might be... see VCO thread on the third temple.

we will know soon i think.

Blessings
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
Temple was not on the "temple mount" but beside it.
The temple mount was the Roman garrison.
The Jews can build any building they wish anywhere they wish but God will not be there so there will be nothing holy about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm and vassal
DRobinson said:
Temple was not on the "temple mount" but beside it.
The temple mount was the Roman garrison.
The Jews can build any building they wish anywhere they wish but God will not be there so there will be nothing holy about it.
Click to expand...
yes I tend to agree, the real location seem to be a bit away from temple mount, @VCO had a good thread on it and I leaded a lot from it.
 
DRobinson said:
he temple mount was the Roman garrison.
Click to expand...
That is incorrect and there are also a lot of theories about the Temple Mount contradicting each other. But according to Wikipedia "The Antonia Fortress (Aramaic: קצטרא דאנטוניה)[a] was a citadel built by Herod the Great and named for Herod's patron Mark Antony, as a fortress whose chief function was to protect the Second Temple. It was built in Jerusalem at the eastern end of the Second Wall, at the north-western corner of the Temple Mount.

So in fact it not directly on the Temple Mount.
 
Nehemiah6 said:
That is incorrect and there are also a lot of theories about the Temple Mount contradicting each other. But according to Wikipedia "The Antonia Fortress (Aramaic: קצטרא דאנטוניה)[a] was a citadel built by Herod the Great and named for Herod's patron Mark Antony, as a fortress whose chief function was to protect the Second Temple. It was built in Jerusalem at the eastern end of the Second Wall, at the north-western corner of the Temple Mount.

So in fact it not directly on the Temple Mount.
Click to expand...
Your source is unreliable.
Many of its entries are wrong.
 
DRobinson said:
Your source is unreliable.
Many of its entries are wrong.
Click to expand...

Wikipedia is not always a reliable source.
However, we can't conclude Nehemiah's claim is wrong, or refuted, simply because we question his source.
At most, it show's his claim requires better evidence for his claim to be strong.

It's easy enough for either party to strengthen their case by presenting better evidence.



Alright, I'll go away now.
Have a great week everyone.

.
.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back