Anytime my preferred candidate doesn’t win a presidential election, it’s proof there was a ton of rigging, hoaxing, and scamming going on. An election can only be valid if my presidential candidate wins.
NEW CC Perspectives on Levels of Conspiracy & Corruption in 2020 Election, CV19 & DS Existence
- Thread starter Solemateleft
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
No one denies there was election fraud in 2020. The only thing being disputed is whether or not it was sufficient to change the outcome. So it seems very reasonable to want to deal with the election fraud that we know about, the only people who would oppose that are those who lie, cheat and steal.
Meh, since 2016, each losing side claims some type of rigging/fixing/hoaxing/etc. when their preferred side loses. How people can’t see how ridiculous they look when they only believe election results that favor them, is beyond me. I guess that’s what psychologists call a blind spot.
No, the accusations go back to LBJ and the box 13 scandal. JFK was accused, Nixon resigned over this issue, the idea that this began in 2016 is absurdly naive.
Ok then i’ll line this back up and try again.
For quite a while now, the losing side claims rigging/fixing/hoaxing/etc when their side loses, and they only consider an election legit if they win. To me that seems suspect. A bit of a blind spot considering people don’t realize how silly they look when an election is only legit when they win.
You might be able to dismantle my sentences. But my gist will continue to stand.
There is talk by some of useful idiots who just believe everything the mainstream media narrative tells them. But sadly, the same can be said of those who accept everything their alternative media tells them. Alternative media are just like the mainstream media. They’re in it for the clicks, hits, shares, ad revenue, and other forms of popularity and money. If saying something will get them more fame, hits, revenue, and traffic, they’ll say it. Making someone just as much a useful idiot as the one who believes everything from the mainstream media.
Long story short, them people being played for a fool too, by their alternative media sources. They’ll concoct stories and narratives that you want to hear and perceive to be true if it will further their traffic and revenue.
Sorry if this touched a nerve, truth has a tendency to do that.
Long story short, them people being played for a fool too, by their alternative media sources. They’ll concoct stories and narratives that you want to hear and perceive to be true if it will further their traffic and revenue.
Sorry if this touched a nerve, truth has a tendency to do that.
Long story short, the internet is the worst thing that has happened to humanity.
It should have stopped at around 1999 when there was a sense of hope and excitement for this new technology which was going to change our lives because we were going to share information quickly.
Little did we know that it was going to turn into a minefield of filth, conspiracy theories, sheer stupidity and insanity and a general dumbing down of the population.
Yeah I’m up in the air on this one. Eyes have been opened by allowing other people a voice. But the problem is, so many people only want to hear truth that affirms their agenda. So if a source quotes actual truth, and it’s a truth they want to believe then they follow it. But if another source provides a truth, and they don’t want to believe it, well then, back to our bubbles we go.
Do you possess an original thought?
Ya just saw another poster use this term and thought it would be good to add to your repertoire of insults to those that think differently than you.
Yeah it's a double-edged sword.
The idiot is on the same footing with a person who has dedicated their lives to a profession.
They both have a megaphone which reaches the world on equal footing.
I think I’m going to follow my own advice regarding your posts and just Scroll Thee Fastly On by them. You seem a tad bit tweeked over something or other.
I just can’t conceivably see how it’s possible that people can’t see the alternative sources are just as corrupt and money hungry as the mainstream sources!
You call it "bubble". I call it "Team sports".
It's just a phase the world has to go through.
Lol well it’s an entire shebang whatever it is! Yes team sports, gang warfare. How people can’t see through the droves and droves of this stuff, I dunno. Maybe I do have a dog in this hunt.
I can’t help myself from posting droves and droves on this topic, it is as if I have a dog in this hunt, and oddly I can see it now!
Yes it IS something the world has to go through. Just like the GOOD book says, a time and season for everything. I know that is a copycat verse from scripture, not my original idea. I do have droves of original ideas tho.
