My wording was clear: I was speaking of Jesus having sent Mary Magdalene as the first to testify to the others, and you cannot refute that. Instead you introduce things not under discussion while outright denying what Scripture says. I said, Mary Magdalene was the first one Jesus sent to testify of His resurrection. You denied it. Mary Is Magdalene was in fact the first one sent by Jesus to testify of His resurrection.
1 Corinthians and Romans are letters to churches that do not involve Luke, j/s
Paul is already defended by Peter in the Bible, so we don't really need an article that has a mixture of truth and false teaching.
2 Peter 3:15 Bear in mind that our Lord’s patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him. 16 He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.
17 Therefore, dear friends, since you have been forewarned, be on your guard so that you may not be carried away by the error of the lawless and fall from your secure position.
This passage is all we ever need. God somehow knew that some people were going to try to discredit His servant Paul and addressed it right here. God is so sweet and cool!
16 He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters.Paul is already defended by Peter in the Bible, so we don't really need an article that has a mixture of truth and false teaching.
2 Peter 3:15 Bear in mind that our Lord’s patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him. 16 He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.
17 Therefore, dear friends, since you have been forewarned, be on your guard so that you may not be carried away by the error of the lawless and fall from your secure position.
This passage is all we ever need. God somehow knew that some people were going to try to discredit His servant Paul and addressed it right here. God is so sweet and very cool!
It's not a matter of hierarchy I speak about. Man is the head of the home, marriage, family. There's no question about it. But the usage of "the Law and personal viewpoint (I DO NOT PERMIT)" is not found anywhere else in the other 64 Books of the Bible nor in any of Jesus teachings nor the Disciples about this topic. And that is not according to how everything else is mentioned throughout the Bible. This is why I discuss it.Satan has been trying to disrupt God's order since the Garden of Eden when He fooled Eve into eating the fruit without consulting God and Adam.. But you go do whatever you want. As for me I'm going to respect God's hierarchy and order. It's not only reflected in Paul's writing, it's also reflected throughout the entire Bible.
I preach using Paul's Inspired words to hundreds of people weekly. I lead more people to Jesus in a single year than you go to the grocery store. This is a discussion about 6 words only (the Law - I DO NOT PERMIT). Clearly you are not a Student of God because this discussion is a hot topic in most Biblical Universities. Have a nice life.I really don't care. I'm just wary of you because of your dismissive view of Paul's writings as not being God-inspired. That just tells me there is something of a rebellious spirit in you that resists the Holy Spirit, if you even have Him. I will not listen to you.
Jesus freed us from the Law but Paul says according to the Law women should be quiet.Matthew 7:21-23
I Never Knew You
21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ 23 And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’
All that "work" you're doing won't impress God if you're calling into question what God inspired Paul to write, even if it's only 6 words. Because it's not really Paul writing that, it's God. He is the one moving Paul to write those things.
I don't care if feminism is trending in Bible universities. Trends don't matter to God. who is eternal Satan is using feminism to disrupt God's order, and telling women they are less because of their place in God's order. But if a woman keeps her eyes on the Lord, she will never be or feel "less" and she will be able to accomplish much just like the Proverbs 31 woman and all the other women of high esteem in the Bible.
It's just awful what Satan has done in the church. Because if you read about all the godly women in the Bible, NONE of them were hung up on this issue. That's why I refuse to engage Satan on this as well.
You have misunderstood Paul, and forgotten that God the Holy Spirit directed Paul to pen everything written in the epistles (which are Scripture according to Peter. When Paul said "Law" it was a reference to the whole Tanakh (OT) and he was pointing us to the Torah, which has Genesis 3:16. I have already quoted commentators who have explained this, so kindly read my posts. Indeed the Ten Commandments within the Law are still binding and a part of the New Covenant and the Law of Love.
I will give you the Biblical Universities answer to this issue using Scholars/Theologians.
More baloney from the naysayers. If indeed that was true none of the modern versions would have these verses. But they all do, so you should discard that nonsense. Here is 1 Cor 14:34 in the Critical Text compared to the Received Text with only one word missing from the former :
I wouldn't trust the kjv knowing about the process of the TR and Erasmus if someone paid me a trillion dollars.
