-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
It reminds me of the terminator sinking into the molten metal where all you could see was his head and hand
Wow, I saw that too but just now see the image, and the butterfly as well, very telling.
Yep, this was an approved FreeMason portrait, in case anyone had any doubts about him being a 33rd degree Mason.
Yep, all masons have to believe in God, not till you get to King Charles level that you find out who they think God is.
Portrait in a Smoky, Red: Welcome to the Hotel California
The artist's manipulation of light and color in this piece is quite impressive. The dominance of red light creates a sense of intensity and foreboding, immediately capturing the viewer's attention by the face and hands of King Charles. It is almost as though he is floating in a pool of blood and all we see is his face, or perhaps he is the door man to a frightening night club. Hotel California comes to mind. While the artist has effectively conveyed a sense of mood and atmosphere, the subject matter of the painting may be unsettling for some viewers. The depiction of King Charles in such a vivid and unsettling setting may remind people of what happened to Diana and cause them to ask, were there more that we don't know about?
In this painting, the artist demonstrates a strong command of visual elements to convey emotion and atmosphere. However, consider the potential impact of the subject matter on the viewer ensuring that the artistic intent is clear and purposeful. This painting tells me they are not hiding anymore. It is like watching a play, the first Act is over, they have seized power, there is nothing you can do about it, and now you see Act 2 begins as you enter the door to hell.
The artist's manipulation of light and color in this piece is quite impressive. The dominance of red light creates a sense of intensity and foreboding, immediately capturing the viewer's attention by the face and hands of King Charles. It is almost as though he is floating in a pool of blood and all we see is his face, or perhaps he is the door man to a frightening night club. Hotel California comes to mind. While the artist has effectively conveyed a sense of mood and atmosphere, the subject matter of the painting may be unsettling for some viewers. The depiction of King Charles in such a vivid and unsettling setting may remind people of what happened to Diana and cause them to ask, were there more that we don't know about?
In this painting, the artist demonstrates a strong command of visual elements to convey emotion and atmosphere. However, consider the potential impact of the subject matter on the viewer ensuring that the artistic intent is clear and purposeful. This painting tells me they are not hiding anymore. It is like watching a play, the first Act is over, they have seized power, there is nothing you can do about it, and now you see Act 2 begins as you enter the door to hell.
I think the problem is our human attitude to want to believe "it's all this" or "it's all that". One "side" is always right and the other wrong. They want simple and absolutes when we're dealing with human individuals who are all imperfect; and each specific action has degrees and parts of good/harm.
Anyone who can't identify poor behavior by both sides has this deficiency. And it becomes everyone's problem.
Scripture calls on us to shrewd as serpents and innocent as doves, acquire knowledge, help the least of these, love thy neighbor and be peacemakers.
These 3 videos are full of relevant info and varying perspectives. The first digs into the current state of (non-war) concerns regarding political constructs. The second covers basic history leading to current day with a more Israeli perspective. And the third a debate between two highly informed individuals. I invite anyone to comment on these.
1. Israel's Apartheid Against Palestinians: Cruel System of Domination and Crime Against Humanity Amnesty International
2. Did Israel Steal Palestinian Land? Ayn Rand Institute
3. DEBATE: Israel-Palestine w/ Noam Chomsky & Rudy Rochman
Noam Chomsky is a brilliant mind, an expert on the history and the geopolitics, however Finkelstein (Chomsky's protege) wrote the book on Gaza, it is the seminal work on the topic, fact based, it references many primary sources with an in-depth analysis.
Some of the issues discussed are how Jewish students are being bullied and harassed on college campuses and no one seems to care, but if any other ethnicity of people were being harassed and bullied, the perpetrators would be expelled
These protests seem to be mostly performative . Meanwhile, China currently has 2 million Muslims in concentration camps and it's crickets from the left
Sam discusses how this selective outrage is motivated by white guilt.
Any criticism of the ideas of Islam or the problem of Islamic violence is seen as hatred of brown people
Meanwhile most of these college kids come from wealthy families and are probably the most privileged kids in America
I am beginning to wonder if he, indeed, wishes that the numbers had been higher, surpassing the 6 million accomplishments by the gestapo. I mean, if you leave even one, they'll only eventually repopulate the earth.
So, tell me, will Hamas ever be willing to denounce their endeavor to irradicate the earth of Jews?
Do you ever consult, listen to other influencers?
Sam Harris is hardly the most reputable guy in town. Now Chomsky a professor of linguistics can speak with expertise on many topics because he is actually brilliant and because he knows his stuff and backs it up with facts.
Sam Harris.
1. Since getting his PhD, he has conducted no scientific research.
2. Since getting his PhD, he has taught no university/college courses in neuroscience.
3. Since getting his PhD, he has devoted his efforts to his anti-religious think tank and publishing books, such as the one on using drugs and meditation to discover truths about our reality.
4. He received his PhD through partial funding from his own atheist organization.
5. He didn’t do any of the experiments for his own thesis work.
6. His PhD thesis was about how science can determine what is right and wrong and he turned it into a book for sale.
7. Since publishing his thesis/book, Harris has yet to use science to resolve a single moral dispute.
Sam Harris authored three articles as a PhD student ( I am not finding evidence of more than that) and yet he was granted his doctorate, something wrong there.
https://shadowtolight.wordpress.com/2015/01/07/neuroscientist-sam-harris/