trinity is controversial?
- Thread starter timemeddler
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Eugenics is not a word found in the Bible either....doesn't mean it's not wrong.
"Amazing Grace" are two words not found together in scriptures but no one argues that this concept is wrong.
Why "Trinity" is so argued heavily against in concept or truth is that people are desperate for Jesus not to be God.
Because if Jesus is God incarnate...then they are in big trouble. Guilty of Blasphemy. Blasphemous statements involving God's name...and a LOT of other sins that the Old Testament Considered death penalty worthy....enough to keep them from ever gaining access to Heaven or be pleasing to God in any manner....they are a "doer of evil".
"Amazing Grace" are two words not found together in scriptures but no one argues that this concept is wrong.
Why "Trinity" is so argued heavily against in concept or truth is that people are desperate for Jesus not to be God.
Because if Jesus is God incarnate...then they are in big trouble. Guilty of Blasphemy. Blasphemous statements involving God's name...and a LOT of other sins that the Old Testament Considered death penalty worthy....enough to keep them from ever gaining access to Heaven or be pleasing to God in any manner....they are a "doer of evil".
4:
1 Now when Jesus learned that the Pharisees had heard that Jesus was making and baptizing more disciples than John
2 (although Jesus himself did not baptize, but only his disciples)
They're compared to John baptizing who fully dunked in water.
So where does this false notion of sprinkling come about and falsely applied to the Apostles?
1 Now when Jesus learned that the Pharisees had heard that Jesus was making and baptizing more disciples than John
2 (although Jesus himself did not baptize, but only his disciples)
They're compared to John baptizing who fully dunked in water.
So where does this false notion of sprinkling come about and falsely applied to the Apostles?
You clearly haven't even read the didache.
Does our scripture not say something about judging before you have even heard?
A true Jew.
Does our scripture not say something about judging before you have even heard?
A true Jew.
And concerning baptism, baptize this way: Having first said all these things, baptize into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, in living water. But if you have not living water, baptize into other water; and if you can not in cold, in warm. But if you have not either, pour out water thrice upon the head into the name of Father and Son and Holy Spirit. But before the baptism let the baptizer fast, and the baptized, and whatever others can; but you shall order the baptized to fast one or two days before.
9 And it came to pass in those days that Jesus came from Nazareth of Galilee and was baptized in the Jordan by John.
10 And immediately going up out of the water he saw the heavens rent
If Jesus had His Disciples baptizing it seems logical to believe He would have the Disciples baptize like Jesus Himself was baptized.
10 And immediately going up out of the water he saw the heavens rent
If Jesus had His Disciples baptizing it seems logical to believe He would have the Disciples baptize like Jesus Himself was baptized.
-
1
- Show all