Could Trump do anything to make you stop supporting him?
- Thread starter ResidentAlien
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
While I do not know if he really did that or not, I would certainly agree that Trumps escapades with women is hardly up for denial.
So even though Clinton pulled his pants down in the oval office and used that office like a red district honky tonk bar, that was ok
I don't think you and several others here know how to evaluate and verify, not to mention consider both sides and their intent.
I guess we'll just conclude with Jesus words to the woman caught in adultery on that one
Trump is not running on moral issues.
Biden, on the other hand, IS a moral issue
Did you miss this? fome my post # 6665
The left found him guilty before any trial occurred. Tell us please; how do you turn a state case that was never a case and never bothered with by any other person in the legal system in NYC, into a Federal case?
And having performed that magic trick, how do you then try said case when it is past its statue of limitations?
what is a statue of limitations? This is a criminal statute of limitations. The main purpose of this criminal law is to ensure that evidence leading to a conviction has not deteriorated over a period of time. After a specified amount of time passes, the criminal case can no longer go to trial. oops
the only manipulations are those engendered by Bragg, and the judge who played to his audience
do you not consider the facts? don't bother trying to say Trump this or that. the entire LEGAL point is that a case was fabricated....should not have been brought...was never Federal and to top it off, Bragg does not have the legal right to try a Federal case whether or not he manufactured it
you do not even have to ask the question if Trump is guilty or not. The actual trial itself was unlawful
So even though Clinton pulled his pants down in the oval office and used that office like a red district honky tonk bar, that was ok
I don't think you and several others here know how to evaluate and verify, not to mention consider both sides and their intent.
I guess we'll just conclude with Jesus words to the woman caught in adultery on that one
Trump is not running on moral issues.
Biden, on the other hand, IS a moral issue
Did you miss this? fome my post # 6665
The left found him guilty before any trial occurred. Tell us please; how do you turn a state case that was never a case and never bothered with by any other person in the legal system in NYC, into a Federal case?
And having performed that magic trick, how do you then try said case when it is past its statue of limitations?
what is a statue of limitations? This is a criminal statute of limitations. The main purpose of this criminal law is to ensure that evidence leading to a conviction has not deteriorated over a period of time. After a specified amount of time passes, the criminal case can no longer go to trial. oops
the only manipulations are those engendered by Bragg, and the judge who played to his audience
do you not consider the facts? don't bother trying to say Trump this or that. the entire LEGAL point is that a case was fabricated....should not have been brought...was never Federal and to top it off, Bragg does not have the legal right to try a Federal case whether or not he manufactured it
you do not even have to ask the question if Trump is guilty or not. The actual trial itself was unlawful
-
1
- Show all
Yes, but that is also why we don't do these trials during election years because the appeal will not conclude prior to the election.
If the ruling is reversed on appeal can he sue for damages?
This is what is known as lawfare. You don't have to be guilty of a crime for you to suffer the consequences.
The very fact they are holding this trial so close to the election is a crime in itself. If they had done this a year ago it already would have been overturned on appeal and that would have given Trump a boost. They know that, so not only is this a crime to damage his campaign it is premeditated crime.
If the ruling is reversed on appeal can he sue for damages?
This is what is known as lawfare. You don't have to be guilty of a crime for you to suffer the consequences.
The very fact they are holding this trial so close to the election is a crime in itself. If they had done this a year ago it already would have been overturned on appeal and that would have given Trump a boost. They know that, so not only is this a crime to damage his campaign it is premeditated crime.
-
1
- Show all
That is not something a jury decides, it is a constitutional right to American citizens.
You begin the deliberation with the assumption of innocence and the trial must provide overwhelming evidence of guilt that is beyond reasonable doubt. If it doesn't then you rule "not guilty". The jury never rules "innocent".
You begin the deliberation with the assumption of innocence and the trial must provide overwhelming evidence of guilt that is beyond reasonable doubt. If it doesn't then you rule "not guilty". The jury never rules "innocent".
