Q is Real, Because Math Says So... Time to Put an End to All Doubt AMERICAN HYPNOTIST JUN 27, 2024
View attachment 265128
Badlands Media
AMERICAN HYPNOTIST:
"Greetings Friends,
I’m going to make a bold claim:
the only way a person could doubt that Q is a legitimate insider is if they don’t understand Q.
Put another way, when someone claims that Q is just a “LARP” (an actor, in other words), then this alone shows you that they have no idea what they’re talking about.
I don’t intend to be rude per se—however, considering the derisive treatment of Q supporters by the “anti Q” world (comprising of many on both sides of the political aisle), I don’t plan on sparing anyone’s feelings, either. When people lambaste Q supporters for being “stupid” or “lazy” or “crazy”, they’re behaving in the precisely same manner as the left does when they baselessly accuse Trump supporters of being dumb, evil, etc.
Condemnation or dismissal without sufficient cause should NOT be the standard way that people deal with each other—nor should it be the standard method by which logical proposals are evaluated. If one is going to paint one’s countrymen with broad brushstrokes as dumb or crazy, then such an accusation should be founded upon a legitimate review of objective evidence. Society cannot function—let alone improve—when feelings supersede rationality.
My challenge to all who would say that Q is nothing more than a LARP is this: can you provide a workable mathematic/statistical model that compels us to assume Q is “fake”, rather than a legitimate insider connected to Trump?
If one intends to dismiss or debunk Q, then it’s nothing short of
mandatory to answer this question.
Not a SINGLE detractor has ever produced such a model in the past six and a half years since Q first appeared on the scene.
How come no one has done this?
Because it’s impossible. From the perspective of mathematics (
not mine or anyone else’s subjective opinion), it’s
far more rational to trust that Q is a legitimate insider than not. Today,
I’m going to show you why this is the case.
Getting a Handle on the Basics
In the first instance, we need to separate Q from content creators who have taken Q’s material and run wild with it.
Q is not responsible for anything that 3rd parties might say—in order to determine Q’s legitimacy, we cannot rely on 3rd party reporting. We must go directly to the source, that being the Q drops themselves. ...
The Reality of Information Warfare
In analyzing the Q drops, we need to give
some leeway insofar as the Q team necessarily engages in a bit of disinformation themselves. This may superficially appear to be a contradiction, but when one looks at the Q posts, one realizes that
we’re necessarily dealing with multi-layered communication. You must “read between the lines”, which is exactly what the Q proofs enable us to do—they allow us to decipher the
real message without being thrown off by the “cover story”. ...
Anyways, the important point here is that there are multiple layers to every event, every tweet, and every move being made.
Those who judge based on appearances alone will NEVER figure out the truth—and that’s a promise. “Expanding your thinking” inherently means considering possibilities that one would previously never consider. ...
On Math and Probabilities
If someone were to tell you that “all Q proofs are just a coincidence,” then this would be the logical equivalent of telling you that it’s reasonable to expect to roll the number six, not six times, but ten million times in a row.
A rational person might ask:
At what point does one ask if the dice are loaded?
Likewise, the sheer number of coincidences between Q’s posts and Trump’s tweets alone should cause us to question the assumption that Q is somehow nothing more than a LARP.
There comes a point at which we’re justified in asking if coordination is taking place.
Obviously, if it’s true that Q and Trump are coordinating their posts, then this means Q is a real insider—not a LARP, as so many say. ...
A Handful of Proofs is All We Need
One could spend hours and hours researching Q proofs, but such effort is not required to clearly demonstrate the validity of Q. It only takes a handful of proofs to make an extremely compelling statistical case that Q and Trump are connected.
The first Q proof I want to address is the fact that on December 9th, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Q wrote, “We love our U.S. Military. On behalf of an entire Nation, THANK YOU for your sacrifice and service”, after which,
Trump posted the same message VERBATIM to Twitter (including the capitalization and punctuation) at 1:37 PM on the same day. That’s 98 characters worth of text that perfectly matches.
What do you think the odds are that Trump would
unknowingly repeat 98 characters worth of the very same text that Q posted only a few hours earlier?
Indeed, we’re only one proof in, and already we’re
well past the point where it would statistically be likely for this to be a coincidence.
to drive the point home even further, let’s examine another proof:
We can see in the graphic below that
many politicians (not just Trump) have echoed a Q post from April 9th, 2020.
Now that we’re adding additional people to the sum of factors, the chances of this being just a coincidence could very well be less than 1 in 100 trillion (just to throw an estimate out there, as the sheer number of multiplying factors we need to calculate this are almost uncountable).
What is the Threshold for Statistical Significance?
What it Means to Be a Rational Person
Looking at the word
rational, we can see that it includes the word
ratio, which strongly suggests that
the essence of rationality is to put things in proper proportion. To be “rational” is to be “measured” in your approach to things. Conversely, to be
irrational is to
utterly disregard proper proportion in one’s actions, decisions, and judgments. A rational person seeks a harmonious middle, while an irrational person wittingly or unwittingly careens towards disharmonious extremes.
In light of all the evidence we’ve presented, it’s actually an
extreme position to say that Q is a LARP, given that there’s simply no statistical argument in favor of that position. Isn’t it interesting that those of us who believe Q is a real insider are the ones labeled as “extremists”?
The law of psychological projection is one of the most reliable of all psychological “laws”.
Conclusion
Q has given many people an incredible amount of hope—how fortunate it is that we can
trust this source of hope with
genuine logical conviction. We are fully and rationally justified in believing that the nightmare of Clown World will someday come to an end, and that America will one day be restored to greatness. Furthermore, we are justified in our quest to find hidden clues and “comms” everywhere we look.
If Q is real, then that means we’re doing a
real service to America (and the world) by putting the comms together and broadcasting our findings online. In fact, it’s one of the most important things we could be doing with our time.
There’s a 5G battle going on, and we were invited to PARTICIPATE.
I can hardly think of a greater honor.
WWG1WGA!
1
