There will be no Rapture!!!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,402
13,353
113
Adam had no life to impart, lost his righteousness, and was incapable of saving his wife. Not only didn't he die for her, he was incapable of dying for her.
Moses is a type, but was not able to lead them into the promised land.
Joshua is a type, but did not give them rest.
The offerings are a type, but the blood of the sacrifices could not remove sin.
David is a type, but could not build the house of the LORD.
John is a type, but his baptism did not save.

Adam doesn't need to be Christ in order to foreshadow what Christ would do.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
17,605
6,082
113
62
Moses is a type, but was not able to lead them into the promised land.
Joshua is a type, but did not give them rest.
The offerings are a type, but the blood of the sacrifices could not remove sin.
David is a type, but could not build the house of the LORD.
John is a type, but his baptism did not save.

Adam doesn't need to be Christ in order to foreshadow what Christ would do.
All true. But the content of being like Christ is offered in Romans 5. The only likeness there is representation of the human race.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,402
13,353
113
His only chance to save her was not to eat. He wasn't thinking of her, but himself.
would that have saved her?
do the lost receive eternal life by our faith?

in the end tho both of them were saved, by their confession and faith.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,402
13,353
113
All true. But the content of being like Christ is offered in Romans 5. The only likeness there is representation of the human race.
the trespass and the gift are both compared and contrasted - and both involved the death of the man so that the bride would not die alone.

what i'm saying is Adam knowingly giving up his life to be with his bride, prefigures Christ laying down His life to be with us.
for Adam it was sin and ineffective, but for Jesus it is righteousness and gives us life - just like if you or i touched a leper, we would be unclean, but when Jesus touches one, the leper becomes clean. we can have the same compassion in our hearts, but we don't have the power in ourselves to heal the world - only if it is God dwelling in us does that kind of thing take place by our hands.

He is human, like us, but He is also God, unlike us. Adam couldn't do the God parts - the fig leaves had to come off, and they had to be clothed with robes God Himself made

maybe Adam thought he could - but i would think that's deception too, so i doubt it. i think more likely he knew it wouldn't save her: he did it anyway, knowing it was wrong.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
17,605
6,082
113
62
would that have saved her?
do the lost receive eternal life by our faith?

in the end tho both of them were saved, by their confession and faith.
Agree. But he was representative of mankind. Had he remained faithful, he would have inherited eternal life for all mankind.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,402
13,353
113
He is human, like us, but He is also God, unlike us. Adam couldn't do the God parts - the fig leaves had to come off, and they had to be clothed with robes God Himself made

maybe Adam thought he could - but i would think that's deception too, so i doubt it. i think more likely he knew it wouldn't save her: he did it anyway, knowing it was wrong.
i don't think they expected the fig leaves to work. i think it was an expression of their shame, like wearing sackcloth and ashes. imo the tree of dying is a fig.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
21,055
7,734
113
i don't think they expected the fig leaves to work. i think it was an expression of their shame, like wearing sackcloth and ashes. imo the tree of dying is a fig.
Agree. They were in effect GRAVECLOTHES.
A symbol of mourning and regret.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
21,055
7,734
113
How? Christ died for our sake, taking our sin upon Himself, to impart life and righteousness to us. Adam had no life to impart, lost his righteousness, and was incapable of saving his wife. Not only didn't he die for her, he was incapable of dying for her.
And this makes a mockery of the context of Romans 5. The only similarity there between Adam and Christ is that they both represented the human race.

If anything, he could have refused sin, achieved eternal life, and hoped to save her this way.
Theoretically, the death of Adam MAY have been sufficient propitiation for the fall of the Woman (we will never know).
But it would have been a fixed 1:1 ratio in any case.

What we DO have now is an INFINITE LIFE that is an exceedingly overabundant propitiation for a still finite but innumerable number of sinners who have chosen/been chosen for salvation in His Name.

Because of course God always "overdoes it" when His sanctification and glory is at stake.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
17,605
6,082
113
62
the trespass and the gift are both compared and contrasted - and both involved the death of the man so that the bride would not die alone.

what i'm saying is Adam knowingly giving up his life to be with his bride, prefigures Christ laying down His life to be with us.
for Adam it was sin and ineffective, but for Jesus it is righteousness and gives us life - just like if you or i touched a leper, we would be unclean, but when Jesus touches one, the leper becomes clean. we can have the same compassion in our hearts, but we don't have the power in ourselves to heal the world - only if it is God dwelling in us does that kind of thing take place by our hands.

He is human, like us, but He is also God, unlike us. Adam couldn't do the God parts - the fig leaves had to come off, and they had to be clothed with robes God Himself made
Again, all correct, but the fig leaves came after sin, thus, after his ability to save was past. And Adam, like Christ, was able to save. Had he not sinned, eternal life would have come through him. But I disagree that his motivation was selfless in partaking of the fruit.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
17,605
6,082
113
62
Theoretically, the death of Adam MAY have been sufficient propitiation for the fall of the Woman (we will never know).
But it would have been a fixed 1:1 ratio in any case.

What we DO have now is an INFINITE LIFE that is an exceedingly overabundant propitiation for a still finite but innumerable number of sinners who have chosen/been chosen for salvation in His Name.

Because of course God always "overdoes it" when His sanctification and glory is at stake.
Adam did not possess eternal life before sinning. As God's representative for the human race, he could only attain it by not sinning. He couldn't become sin for her.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
21,055
7,734
113
But I disagree that his motivation was selfless in partaking of the fruit.
Any how do you explain that position? What exactly did Adam hope to gain by intentionally sinning, knowing full well the implications?
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
21,055
7,734
113
Adam did not possess eternal life before sinning.
Ahhhh.....no.

God created Adam to enjoy eternity with Him. There is no doubt that Adam was created eternally alive because he was "unioned" with The Life. No sin, no breach, no interruption. Perfect fellowship, perfect life as God defines life.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
17,605
6,082
113
62
i don't think they expected the fig leaves to work. i think it was an expression of their shame, like wearing sackcloth and ashes. imo the tree of dying is a fig.
Again correct. But at that point Adam had no means to save her. Obedience would have been a faithful act on his part; not disobedience.
And Christ didn't die so we wouldn't die alone. He died so we might live.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
17,605
6,082
113
62
Ahhhh.....no.

God created Adam to enjoy eternity with Him. There is no doubt that Adam was created eternally alive because he was "unioned" with The Life. No sin, no breach, no interruption. Perfect fellowship, perfect life as God defines life.
Disagree. Like Christ, he would have had to fulfill all righteousness to have eternal life.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
17,605
6,082
113
62
Any how do you explain that position? What exactly did Adam hope to gain by intentionally sinning, knowing full well the implications?
Because he wasn't deceived. He knew eating led to death.