Yes...we want to do all things for his glory -- but the question that needs to be asked to determine if any given choice we make would be to his glory should be based on the two greatest commandments. I don't think God is going to think of me less for choosing to wear one color of socks over another; or for that matter that my neighbor would perceive that I don't love him because of the color of socks I'm wearing.
Since Jesus wasn't very concerned about his disciples eating with dirty hands, which would y seem to carry weightier moral-spiritual implications, e.g. keeping God's temple (our bodies) free from food contamination since even our bodies are not our own, then I have to think how much less the color socks we wear.
In fact, what I just wrote above brought to mind the Conscientious Objector letter I wrote a few years ago (but never had to formally present) during the height of the covid "pandemic" madness which to me was a genuine life issue -- an issue whereby my choice would either glorify God or not glorify him. The crux to my objection was not along the usual lines of fetus cell material in the drugs, but on something even more fundamental: God owns me! All of me! And God has given me stewardship over my own body. He did not give stewardship to any third party, e.g. any government/civil entity. Therefore, since the government doesn't own anything in this world, how much less has it any right to tell me what I must or shouldn't put into my body? That is between my Creator and myself. And if others feel threatened by my personal health decision to not inject experimental drugs into my body, then the onus should be on them to take whatever additional measures of protection they deem necessary to further ensure their personal safety.