So you are saying that you DISAGREE that Jesus' words
No, yours.
So you are saying that you DISAGREE that Jesus' words
TheDivineWatermark said:
So you are saying that you DISAGREE that Jesus' words [... <ewq1938 SNIPPED the remainder of this sentence>...]
No, yours.
I am sorry if I offended anyone, just like to say let's not lose our focus here. As usual only He has all the answersI am getting really really bored with this thread. I just imagened bunch of scribes coming together and breaking heads over scripture, while Jesus is outside somewhere ministering the needy![]()
Pre-trib rapture deniers continue to avoid this like the plague:
Acts 1:11 Which also said, Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven.
The Second Coming is not at all His coming in the same manner as when He departed at His ascension.
Wrong. All this verse tells us is he will descend down from heaven and stand upon the Earth as he did when he left but simply in reverse order. It does not address the wrath or Armageddon because he is still in the air when those things take place. You are taking it too literally.
Show to us where that verse says anything about his return having anything to do with where He was or will stand.
I have had this person on iggy for a long long time. Why bother wearing out a perfectly good keyboard?Show to us where that verse says anything about his return having anything to do with where He was or will stand.
What that verse CLEARLY STATES is the MANNER in which He returns, which we know that at the rapture His feet will not stand upon the earth since we will rise up to meet Him in the air.
Adding to the text what isn't there is really bad hermeneutics. I'm not accusing you of knowing anything about interpretational rules, but if you study the rules for hermeneutics, you will find that Bible 101 students know better than to try and foist that nonsense as their battering ram against those who are more honest and knowledgeable about scripture, and who are better equipped with what scripture is actually saying.
If I come over to your house and present myself in a manner different than a previous visit, you're not going to be standing there looking at my feet...
Come on! Get with the program here!
MM
Then you do not know what firstfruits is.Wrong. Jesus is not the first fruits of the first resurrection of Rev 20. He is not part of that group that resurrects because he resurrected a LONG time before they do. The first resurrection in Rev 20 is not two or more parts.
The Gathering in Revelation 14 verse 14 is roughly the middle of the tribulation. The 7-year tribulation. And that Gathering definitely shortens the time for the Jews that are gathered in Revelation 14. So that is what you're looking at there.Christ said the trib would be shortened. It was 7 years but now has been cut in half to 42 months, found in Rev 11, 13.
There is no resurrection in Rev 20.Wrong. Jesus is not the first fruits of the first resurrection of Rev 20. He is not part of that group that resurrects because he resurrected a LONG time before they do. The first resurrection in Rev 20 is not two or more parts.
Acts chapter 1.There are none already in the bible. The only rapture verses in the entire bible are all post-trib because that is when the rapture happens.
He was standing and rose into the air, so he will descend from the air and stand again. The rapture happens in the clouds far above the Earth so BEFORE the fulfillment of the verse we are discussing. Anything else I can help with?
^ I'm a "pre-tribber" who sees Jesus' second ascension (the one in Acts 1) to be "in like manner AS YE HAVE SEEN" (i.e. "VISIBLE") to be how He will "RETURN" to the earth (when "every eye shall SEE Him"); whereas His EARLIER ascension (some "40 days" earlier, ON "FIRSTFRUIT" / His Resurrection Day) to be like "our Rapture"... it was only "TOLD" to MM (Jn20:17) but no one visibly saw Him "traveling-up to Heaven" like in the Acts 1 event.
[these TWO events ^ SEPARATED BY "40 days"... and remember, "40" = "TRIAL, etc"]
The Second Coming will be with wrath, destruction and killing, with the blood of the enemies splattered on the garment of Jesus as He delivers the remnant of Israel, the last 1/3 still left alive at His coming.
I've already shown to you the meaninglessness behind trying to make this about standing upon the earth, and you still went that way, which only demonstrates a lack of intellectual honesty toward the text as it speaks specifically to the MANNER of His departure...what He was doing and saying. If you refuse to acknowledge the obvious, then this conversation is dead in the water for lack of handling the text honestly on your part.
MM