(Psalms 103:5) (Is The Earth is Not a Globe or is The Earth a Globe?)

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Which poll answer do you believe is the correct one?

  • I believe the earth is NOT a globe and I DON'T believe Psalms 103:5.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I believe the earth IS a globe and I DON'T believe Psalms 103:5.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    9

Conformed

Active member
Oct 3, 2024
228
26
28
So the earth can be moved but it can't be moved. Not confusing much.

Also, the world is not the same as it was when God created it. Maybe the earth was not rotating to begin with. We were not there so we do not know. Maybe it started spinning when Jesus came to earth. It moves at His presence! Except it's immovable. Go figure.
36851091_1577363022571243_8137394392194351104_n[1].jpg
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,491
13,800
113
Another patently ignorant meme.

When you're in a moving vehicle, it is not moving relative to you. It "feels" stationary. You don't feel like you're moving relative to the vehicle because you aren't, yet when you look outside you realize you are moving, and will normally feel the de/acceleration associated with that movement.

Similarly, on a moving planet, you don't notice the movement normally, because you're moving consistently with the planet. It's not changing velocity so you don't notice its movement, but you may observe the fact of movement by noting the changing position of the sun, moon, and stars relative to your location.
 

Gideon300

Well-known member
Mar 18, 2021
5,368
3,164
113
You can be seated inside an aircraft flying at 600 km per hour. If passengers were splattered inside the fuselage, FE adherents would have a point. I've flown a bit. So far, so good. Now if the earth stopped rotating all of a sudden, we'd be in real trouble.
 

Conformed

Active member
Oct 3, 2024
228
26
28
Another patently ignorant meme.

When you're in a moving vehicle, it is not moving relative to you. It "feels" stationary. You don't feel like you're moving relative to the vehicle because you aren't, yet when you look outside you realize you are moving, and will normally feel the de/acceleration associated with that movement.

Similarly, on a moving planet, you don't notice the movement normally, because you're moving consistently with the planet. It's not changing velocity so you don't notice its movement, but you may observe the fact of movement by noting the changing position of the sun, moon, and stars relative to your location.
(Psalms 103:5)
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,491
13,800
113
Psalm 103
Of David.
1 Praise the Lord, my soul;
all my inmost being, praise his holy name.
2 Praise the Lord, my soul,
and forget not all his benefits—
3 who forgives all your sins
and heals all your diseases,
4 who redeems your life from the pit
and crowns you with love and compassion,
5 who satisfies your desires with good things
so that your youth is renewed like the eagle’s.


Uh huh. Relevance is such a beautiful thing.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,844
13,558
113
  • In Internet culture, sh*tposting or trashposting is the act of using an online forum or social media page to post content that is of "aggressively, ironically, and trollishly poor quality".
  • Sh*tposts are generally intentionally designed to derail discussions or cause the biggest reaction with the least effort.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,844
13,558
113
Another patently ignorant meme.

When you're in a moving vehicle, it is not moving relative to you. It "feels" stationary. You don't feel like you're moving relative to the vehicle because you aren't, yet when you look outside you realize you are moving, and will normally feel the de/acceleration associated with that movement.

Similarly, on a moving planet, you don't notice the movement normally, because you're moving consistently with the planet. It's not changing velocity so you don't notice its movement, but you may observe the fact of movement by noting the changing position of the sun, moon, and stars relative to your location.
yes
 

Conformed

Active member
Oct 3, 2024
228
26
28
Psalm 103
Of David.
1 Praise the Lord, my soul;
all my inmost being, praise his holy name.
2 Praise the Lord, my soul,
and forget not all his benefits—
3 who forgives all your sins
and heals all your diseases,
4 who redeems your life from the pit
and crowns you with love and compassion,
5 who satisfies your desires with good things
so that your youth is renewed like the eagle’s.


Uh huh. Relevance is such a beautiful thing.
Psalms 103:5
Who hast founded the earth upon its own bases: it shall not be moved for ever and ever.
 

Publican

Active member
Oct 1, 2024
438
226
43
You can be seated inside an aircraft flying at 600 km per hour. If passengers were splattered inside the fuselage, FE adherents would have a point. I've flown a bit. So far, so good. Now if the earth stopped rotating all of a sudden, we'd be in real trouble.
It did that once, according to your model. Nothing out of the ordinary transpired.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,844
13,558
113
moving in a circle does induce a tangential acceleration which can be felt and is measurable.

it's called the coriolis force. entire structural engineering courses in architectural schools are dedicated to it.

@Conformed thank you for idiotically highlighting yet another proof the earth isn't flat at the expense of your own reputation for intelligence and/or credibility. a noble sacrifice.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,844
13,558
113
It did that once, according to your model. Nothing out of the ordinary transpired.
because God knows what He is doing, yes.

it was extremely out of the ordinary, but He kept His beloved safe. that was the point.
 

Conformed

Active member
Oct 3, 2024
228
26
28
If astronomical works be searched through and through, there will not be found a single instance of a bold, unhesitating, or manly statement respecting a proof of the Earth’s “rotundity.” Proctor speaks of “proofs which serve to show … that the Earth is not flat,” and says that man “finds reason to think that the Earth is not flat,” and speaks of certain matters being “explained by supposing” that the Earth is a globe; and says that people have “assured themselves that it is a globe;” but he says, also, that there is a “most complete proof that the Earth is a globe:” just as though anything in the world could possibly be wanted but a proof—a proof that proves and settles the whole question. This, however, all the money in the United States Treasury would not buy; and, unless the astronomers are all so rich that they don’t want the cash, it is a sterling proof that the Earth is not a globe.
 

Conformed

Active member
Oct 3, 2024
228
26
28
When a man speaks of a “most complete” thing amongst several other things which claim to be what that thing is, it is evident that they must fall short of something which the “most complete” thing possesses. And when it is known that the “most complete” thing is an entire failure, it is plain that the others, all and sundry, are worthless. Proctor’s “most complete proof that the Earth is a globe” lies in what he calls “the fact” that distances from place to place agree with calculation. But, since the distance round the Earth at 45 “degrees” south of the equator is twice the distance it would be on a globe, it follows that what the greatest astronomer of the age calls “a fact” is NOT a fact; that his “most complete proof” is a most complete failure; and that he might as well have told us, at once, that he has NO PROOF to give us at all. Now, since, if the Earth be a globe, there would, necessarily, be piles of proofs of it all round us, it follows that when astronomers, with all their ingenuity, are utterly unable to point one out—to say nothing about picking one up—that they give us a proof that Earth is not a globe.
 

Conformed

Active member
Oct 3, 2024
228
26
28
The surveyor’s plans in relation to the laying of the first Atlantic Telegraph cable, show that in 1665 miles—from Valentia, Ireland, to St. John’s, Newfoundland—the surface of the Atlantic Ocean is a LEVEL surface—not the astronomers’ “level,” either! The authoritative drawings, published at the time, are a standing evidence of the fact, and form a practical proof that Earth is not a globe.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,844
13,558
113
Psalms 103:5
Who hast founded the earth upon its own bases: it shall not be moved for ever and ever.
2 Peter 3:10​
the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,844
13,558
113
The surveyor’s plans in relation to the laying of the first Atlantic Telegraph cable, show that in 1665 miles—from Valentia, Ireland, to St. John’s, Newfoundland—the surface of the Atlantic Ocean is a LEVEL surface—not the astronomers’ “level,” either! The authoritative drawings, published at the time, are a standing evidence of the fact, and form a practical proof that Earth is not a globe.
pretty sure there is a part of the TOS dealing with plagiarism.

when you quote a masonic liar, you should identify your text as a quote, specifically being the words of a well known masonic liar purposefully designed for decieving people that he considered to be idiotic and ignorant, to convince them the world is flat.

instead of formatting your text as tho it is your own thoughts, you need to cite your sources. you agreed to the TOS. don't be a liar.

we all know from much evidence and experience you don't have any thoughts of your own.
 

Conformed

Active member
Oct 3, 2024
228
26
28
2 Peter 3:10​
the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
The earth which will never moves will be replaced with a new earth.
 

Conformed

Active member
Oct 3, 2024
228
26
28
If the Earth were a globe, it would, if we take Valentia to be the place of departure, curvate downwards, in the 1665 miles across the Atlantic to Newfoundland, according to the astronomers’ own tables, more than three-hundred miles; but, as the surface of the Atlantic does not do so—the fact of its levelness having been clearly demonstrated by Telegraph Cable surveyors,—it follows that we have a grand proof that Earth is not a globe.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,844
13,558
113
The surveyor’s plans in relation to the laying of the first Atlantic Telegraph cable, show that in 1665 miles—from Valentia, Ireland, to St. John’s, Newfoundland—the surface of the Atlantic Ocean is a LEVEL surface—not the astronomers’ “level,” either! The authoritative drawings, published at the time, are a standing evidence of the fact, and form a practical proof that Earth is not a globe.
you clearly aren't the kind of person who says things like "the surveyors plans"

a bit simpler of mind than that.

dead giveaway.
https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/55387/pg55387-images.html

this is the second time i have shown you are plagiarizing this site without giving them their due recognition.