Understanding God’s election

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Oct 19, 2024
1,318
340
83
It is not doublespeak. All moral entities (including God!) have only the ability to make choices that comport with their nature. There's a reason why God cannot sin: it's because he cannot choose against this thrice holy nature. Likewise, there's a reason why fallen man cannot not sin...because he can only choose to do evil. No unregenerate man is good and no one does good!
You raise an interesting question: Is God free to do evil? Is God the Father able to change His will, is God the Son free to sin, and could God the Holy Spirit become demonic? Is it possible for God to be tricky?

If God cannot do what He has decreed to be evil, then He would not be as free as volitional humanity created in His image, and there would be no basis for praising His holiness. Just as God created physical laws such as gravity, so He created moral laws such as “love everyone” and determined a plan of salvation involving the atoning death of Messiah to win our redemption from hell. Thou shalt love (MT 22:37-40).

The Bible clearly teaches that God the Son is free to sin in HB 2:14-18 & 4:15), and Paul (in RM 9:16-21) upholds the freedom of God to love or hate as He chooses. The cliche “might makes right” is true; it is because God is almighty that only He can determine what is right ultimately. There is no super-divine authority that determines God; God is self-determined. The only basis humans have for evaluating whether God is just is understanding how God’s acts and judgments are consistent with the moral principles He has ordained for those created in His image (RM 3:22-26).

If God were ever to change His mind, it would mean that God is tricky and that morality is ultimately arbitrary. Thus, ultimate reality would indeed be a farce. This is why we should not take God and divine love for granted. Instead, we should be eternally grateful that God has decreed loving to be right, and He promises never to change (ML 3:6). Let us praise God in the spirit of Psalm 66:1: “Shout with joy to God, all the earth! Sing to the glory of his name; Offer him glory and praise!”
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,588
297
83
You raise an interesting question: Is God free to do evil? Is God the Father able to change His will, is God the Son free to sin, and could God the Holy Spirit become demonic? Is it possible for God to be tricky?

If God cannot do what He has decreed to be evil, then He would not be as free as volitional humanity created in His image, and there would be no basis for praising His holiness. Just as God created physical laws such as gravity, so He created moral laws such as “love everyone” and determined a plan of salvation involving the atoning death of Messiah to win our redemption from hell. Thou shalt love (MT 22:37-40).

The Bible clearly teaches that God the Son is free to sin in HB 2:14-18 & 4:15), and Paul (in RM 9:16-21) upholds the freedom of God to love or hate as He chooses. The cliche “might makes right” is true; it is because God is almighty that only He can determine what is right ultimately. There is no super-divine authority that determines God; God is self-determined. The only basis humans have for evaluating whether God is just is understanding how God’s acts and judgments are consistent with the moral principles He has ordained for those created in His image (RM 3:22-26).

If God were ever to change His mind, it would mean that God is tricky and that morality is ultimately arbitrary. Thus, ultimate reality would indeed be a farce. This is why we should not take God and divine love for granted. Instead, we should be eternally grateful that God has decreed loving to be right, and He promises never to change (ML 3:6). Let us praise God in the spirit of Psalm 66:1: “Shout with joy to God, all the earth! Sing to the glory of his name; Offer him glory and praise!”


None of the passages you cited teach the peccability of Christ or God. Rather, scripture teaches the impeccability of both! God cannot lie! God cannot DENY himself, i.e. cannot deny who and what he is in his essence (nature). It's cold comfort to know that the triune God is capable of sinning. I thank God for his impeccability and immutability.

And, yes, Jesus was tempted from without -- but never from within! Conversely, man is neither impeccable or immutable. Far from it!

Here's a link if you're interested:

https://www.gotquestions.org/could-Jesus-have-sinned.html

And another reason the the triune God cannot sin is because God is FREE FROM all evil influences. This makes him FREE TO only do what is righteous, just, holy and good.

Tell me: Do you think the saints in our glorified state will be able sin?
 

Gideon300

Well-known member
Mar 18, 2021
5,391
3,180
113
He made it very clear. The passage does not speak to WHAT God foreknew -- but to WHOM (personal pronoun) God knew in eternity ("foreknew" since the Eternal One and eternity existed before temporal reality). You're reading the impersonal pronoun "what" into the passage. That kind of interpretation is called eisegesis because you're adding to the text what isn't there. If God wanted to say he knew WHAT then he could have said through Paul,

"For the faith and repentance that God foreknew in his chosen people..." But that isn't what the text says, is it?

In fact, the NIV renders v.29:

Rom 8:29
29 For those (i.e. people) God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the likeness of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers.
NIV

And this doesn't change the sense of the passage one iota since people are in view here -- not things about people.

Also, the Gr. term "ginosko" which means "know" also denotes an intimate, personal knowledge of its object. For example, Joseph did not "know" (have intimate, personal, sexual knowledge of) Mary until after Jesus' birth:

Matt 1:25
25 And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.

KJV

Matt 1:25
25 and knew her not until she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name Jesus.

Darby

Matt 1:25
25 and did not know her till she brought forth her son — the first-born, and he called his name Jesus.

YLT

Finally, your interpretation would flat out contradict Eph 1:11 since God's will is not contingent on the will of his moral agents.
Yes, Ephesians 1:11 can be taken to mean that God chooses without the knowledge and consent of individuals. However, Romans 8:29 adds the idea that God knew who would receive Christ.

The problem with the concept of election solely by God's choice is that it contradicts His word.

"The Lord is not slow in keeping His promise as some understand slowness, but is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish but everyone to come to repentance." 2 Peter 3:9

"....who wants everyone to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth." 1 Timothy 2:4

God has never withdrawn His gift of free will from mankind. The opposite, man is entirely responsible for everything he says and does. Jesus told us to pray, "Your will be done, on earth as in heaven." Why? Because God's will is not done automatically.

That's why I believe unconditional election is wrong. Does it matter? No, as long as the gospel is preached. Hyper Calvinism says that there is no point in preaching the gospel as God is going to save His elect anyway. That is obviously false. But that is the logical conclusion of unconditional election.
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
3,087
446
83
You may have knowledge, but you lack spiritual discernment, and spiritual discernment is what matters.
:giggle: Duuuhhhh, right!
You don't need knowedge to have distherernment!

Here's your problem.

Proverbs 14:12​
There is a way that seems right to a man,
But its end is the way of death.

That means?
You will be held captive to your own wrong way of thinking without God's knowledge to expose and check you!

Self-righteousness is always self-assured that his way is the correct way…
Because he just feels it must be so.
For after all? God feels the same way as you do on a matter.
Right?


Isaiah 55:8​
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways My ways,” says the Lord.

That means? You must get KNOWLEDGE!
Teaching from someone who has been tested, and proven, able to teach sound doctrine.

.............
 
Oct 19, 2024
1,318
340
83
I think your basic premise is faulty. Man is accountable because he sins. There is no requirement in scripture that says man must know he is sinning to be held accountable.
If you are stopped by a law enforcement professional and he or she gives you a citation for a law you are unfamiliar with, are you any less guilty. Nope. Similarity, if you transgress one of God's laws you are guilty whether you recognize the transgression or not.
What God does say is that man can know of the existence of God through creation, providence, and conscience. Nowhere does it say man has the ability to apply reason as a means of entering into an intimate knowledge of God. In fact the opposite is true. The world through wisdom knows not God...1 Corinthians 1:21. Further, entrance into a relationship with God in Christ comes as a matter of the revelation of God to an individual...Matthew 16:15-17. Keep reading and you find that this is how Jesus is building His church.
So far from being a charade, I'm attempting to show you what the scripture reveals about the fallen estate of man and its affect on mankind. This is in addition to all the verses I know @Magenta has shared with you concerning the impact of sin on the will of man.
So stop considering what you think must be true of God and allow what scripture actually reveals to shape your understanding.
No, my premise is logical, whereas yours fails to explain how a soul who does not know he is sinning is sinning.

Regarding Scripture, Paul explains quite clearly in RM 7:7-13 and GL 3:19-25 that the law was given so that souls would know they were sinners. It is true that intentional ignorance of truth a person had the opportunity to learn/option of learning is blameworthy.

Man can know of the existence of God through creation and conscience, but nowhere does it say man will be condemned to hell even though he had no ability/opportunity to be saved. On the contrary, souls are without excuse because they had the option to seek God and LGW (RM 1:20).

The wisdom of the world Paul cited in 1CR 1:21 is contrasted with GW or the wisdom of God in 2:6-7, which is the mind of Christ (v.16), the incarnate Logos (JN 1:14), and Paul taught (in 1TM 2:3-4) that God wants every sinner to LGW and be saved or enter into a relationship with Him in Christ, just as Peter did in MT 16:15-17. Keep reading and you should learn this truth. So much for the "fallen estate of man. "Stop considering what you think must be true of God and allow what scripture actually reveals to shape your understanding."
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,204
8,422
113
:giggle: Duuuhhhh, right!
You don't need knowedge to have distherernment!

Here's your problem.

Proverbs 14:12​
There is a way that seems right to a man,
But its end is the way of death.

That means?
You will be held captive to your own wrong way of thinking without God's knowledge to expose and check you!

Self-righteousness is always self-assured that his way is the correct way…
Because he just feels it must be so.
For after all? God feels the same way as you do on a matter.
Right?


Isaiah 55:8​
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways My ways,” says the Lord.

That means? You must get KNOWLEDGE!
Teaching from someone who has been tested, and proven, able to teach sound doctrine.

.............
[Pro 1:22 KJV]
How long, ye simple ones, will ye love simplicity? and the scorners delight in their scorning, and fools hate knowledge?

[Pro 7:7 KJV]
And beheld among the simple ones, I discerned among the youths, a young man void of understanding,

[Pro 8:5 KJV]
O ye simple, understand wisdom: and, ye fools, be ye of an understanding heart.

[Pro 14:15 KJV]
The simple believeth every word: but the prudent [man] looketh well to his going.

[Pro 14:18 KJV]
The simple inherit folly: but the prudent are crowned with knowledge.

[Pro 22:3 KJV]
A prudent [man] foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,588
297
83
Yes, Ephesians 1:11 can be taken to mean that God chooses without the knowledge and consent of individuals. However, Romans 8:29 adds the idea that God knew who would receive Christ.

The problem with the concept of election solely by God's choice is that it contradicts His word.

"The Lord is not slow in keeping His promise as some understand slowness, but is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish but everyone to come to repentance." 2 Peter 3:9

"....who wants everyone to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth." 1 Timothy 2:4

God has never withdrawn His gift of free will from mankind. The opposite, man is entirely responsible for everything he says and does. Jesus told us to pray, "Your will be done, on earth as in heaven." Why? Because God's will is not done automatically.

That's why I believe unconditional election is wrong. Does it matter? No, as long as the gospel is preached. Hyper Calvinism says that there is no point in preaching the gospel as God is going to save His elect anyway. That is obviously false. But that is the logical conclusion of unconditional election.
Yes, God knew who would receive Christ because he predestined them in eternity for salvation.

And you're taking 2Pet 3:9 and 1Tim 2:4 out of context. In the former passage, Peter is saying that God does not want any of his readers (the ELECT) to perish. (Pay careful attention to personal pronouns in that passage.) And in the latter passage, Paul is referring to the Gentiles.
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
3,087
446
83
You raise an interesting question: Is God free to do evil?
Like? Is Donald Trump free to deny the truth for a nickle?


Evil is an absolutely putrid, cheap substitute, for what God knows Truth has in store.

Man sins because he is born with the same kind of flesh Adam fell into.
Now, if God's grace-power keeps the flesh in check while giving a man's soul FREEDOM to choose?
Then the depravity of man has been conquered!

That is what @Rufus just does not yet have the capacity to comprehend, because of all the brainwashing he
is wishing to perfect as to gain himself power in this world… All while being done in the name of righteousness.

Jesus put up with false teachers.
So did Paul.
So did John.
And, so did Peter....

False teachers will always oppose the Truth…
While desiring to receive approbation from their invisible influencers, to ironically please their own flesh.

Only Sound Bible doctrine can make us free when accepted and understood
In contrast, the false teachers equate freedom with thinking freely without integrity.

The Lord sees all.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,588
297
83
No, my premise is logical, whereas yours fails to explain how a soul who does not know he is sinning is sinning.

Regarding Scripture, Paul explains quite clearly in RM 7:7-13 and GL 3:19-25 that the law was given so that souls would know they were sinners. It is true that intentional ignorance of truth a person had the opportunity to learn/option of learning is blameworthy.

Man can know of the existence of God through creation and conscience, but nowhere does it say man will be condemned to hell even though he had no ability/opportunity to be saved. On the contrary, souls are without excuse because they had the option to seek God and LGW (RM 1:20).

The wisdom of the world Paul cited in 1CR 1:21 is contrasted with GW or the wisdom of God in 2:6-7, which is the mind of Christ (v.16), the incarnate Logos (JN 1:14), and Paul taught (in 1TM 2:3-4) that God wants every sinner to LGW and be saved or enter into a relationship with Him in Christ, just as Peter did in MT 16:15-17. Keep reading and you should learn this truth. So much for the "fallen estate of man. "Stop considering what you think must be true of God and allow what scripture actually reveals to shape your understanding."
That's easy. Man's heart is utterly deceitful. Men excel at deceiving themselves easier than breathing air. The self-deceived are the most oblivious of all...
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,588
297
83
Like? Is Donald Trump free to deny the truth for a nickle?


Evil is an absolutely putrid, cheap substitute, for what God knows Truth has in store.

Man sins because he is born with the same kind of flesh Adam fell into.
Now, if God's grace-power keeps the flesh in check while giving a man's soul FREEDOM to choose?
Then the depravity of man has been conquered!

That is what @Rufus just does not yet have the capacity to comprehend, because of all the brainwashing he
is wishing to perfect as to gain himself power in this world… All while being done in the name of righteousness.

Jesus put up with false teachers.
So did Paul.
So did John.
And, so did Peter....


False teachers will always oppose the Truth…
While desiring to receive approbation from their invisible influencers, to ironically please their own flesh.

Only Sound Bible doctrine can make us free when accepted and understood
In contrast, the false teachers equate freedom with thinking freely without integrity.

The Lord sees all.
Those are bald-faced lies!
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,588
297
83
[Pro 1:22 KJV]
How long, ye simple ones, will ye love simplicity? and the scorners delight in their scorning, and fools hate knowledge?

[Pro 7:7 KJV]
And beheld among the simple ones, I discerned among the youths, a young man void of understanding,

[Pro 8:5 KJV]
O ye simple, understand wisdom: and, ye fools, be ye of an understanding heart.

[Pro 14:15 KJV]
The simple believeth every word: but the prudent [man] looketh well to his going.

[Pro 14:18 KJV]
The simple inherit folly: but the prudent are crowned with knowledge.

[Pro 22:3 KJV]
A prudent [man] foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.
Physician, heal thyself first!
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,722
583
113
:giggle: Duuuhhhh, right!
You don't need knowedge to have distherernment!

Here's your problem.

Proverbs 14:12​
There is a way that seems right to a man,
But its end is the way of death.

That means?
You will be held captive to your own wrong way of thinking without God's knowledge to expose and check you!

Self-righteousness is always self-assured that his way is the correct way…
Because he just feels it must be so.
For after all? God feels the same way as you do on a matter.
Right?


Isaiah 55:8​
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways My ways,” says the Lord.

That means? You must get KNOWLEDGE!
Teaching from someone who has been tested, and proven, able to teach sound doctrine.

.............
Your reply is absurd - sheer gobbledygook - and I'm not going to waste my time going through it to decipher it into something intelligible so as to correct and explain it to you.
 
Oct 19, 2024
1,318
340
83
None of the passages you cited teach the peccability of Christ or God. Rather, scripture teaches the impeccability of both! God cannot lie! God cannot DENY himself, i.e. cannot deny who and what he is in his essence (nature). It's cold comfort to know that the triune God is capable of sinning. I thank God for his impeccability and immutability.

And, yes, Jesus was tempted from without -- but never from within! Conversely, man is neither impeccable or immutable. Far from it!

Here's a link if you're interested:

https://www.gotquestions.org/could-Jesus-have-sinned.html

And another reason the the triune God cannot sin is because God is FREE FROM all evil influences. This makes him FREE TO only do what is righteous, just, holy and good.

Tell me: Do you think the saints in our glorified state will be able sin?
Regarding "It's cold comfort to know that the triune God is capable of sinning. I thank God for his impeccability and immutability." IOW, you lack faith that God was telling the truth when He said man is created in His image and that He will never change His will to be all-loving, so you are glad God is an amoral automaton, programmed to appear as an angel of love.

Regarding "Jesus was tempted from without -- but never from within!" Scripture does not make that distinction, but rather says "He was tempted in every way just as we are..." (HB 4:15).

Regarding "God cannot sin is because God is FREE FROM all evil influences". God CREATED evil influences or options! If He is not able to choose them, then He is not free but merely forced to "do what is righteous, just, holy and good."

You asked, "Do you think the saints in our glorified state will be able sin?" Yes. Apparently, souls who are saints or saved sinners in heaven retain the freedom to sin by rejecting God, which Satan and his minions are indicated to have exercised (in LK 10:18, MT 25:41, JUDE v.6, cf. EZK 28:15-19). Perhaps the main reason for humanity to be saved by means of this earthly sojourn is to teach them not to make the same mistake!
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,204
8,422
113
Physician, heal thyself first!
I may not be perfect, but I am perfectly willing to devour 12 hours of fine Bible lectures non-stop.
And then listen to them all at least 2 or 3 (sometimes 5 or 6) times over again.

And that is just the cursory background info.
Then I undertake the other 80 or 120 hours of lectures to get a better grasp of the subject matter.

How about you?
 

Gideon300

Well-known member
Mar 18, 2021
5,391
3,180
113
Yes, God knew who would receive Christ because he predestined them in eternity for salvation.

And you're taking 2Pet 3:9 and 1Tim 2:4 out of context. In the former passage, Peter is saying that God does not want any of his readers (the ELECT) to perish. (Pay careful attention to personal pronouns in that passage.) And in the latter passage, Paul is referring to the Gentiles.
So the elect could perish? Makes no sense to me. Believe as you wish. I don't agree. That's fine.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,588
297
83
I may not be perfect, but I am perfectly willing to devour 12 hours of fine Bible lectures non-stop.
And then listen to them all at least 2 or 3 (sometimes 5 or 6) times over again.

And that is just the cursory background info.
Then I undertake the other 80 or 120 hours of lectures to get a better grasp of the subject matter.

How about you?
And I see with all that that studying, hitting the books and all those PH.D. lecturers, you have learned to be proud, arrogant and boastful.

It's no wonder at all that it's written:

1 Cor 1:26-29
26 For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called:


27 But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;

28 And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are:

29 That no flesh should glory in his presence.
KJV

But don't let me stand in the way of your vainglory! You remind me of the back-slapping, self-righteous Pharisees of Jesus' day.
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,722
583
113
And I see with all that that studying, hitting the books and all those PH.D. lecturers, you have learned to be proud, arrogant and boastful.

Hope he didn't spend a lot of money on them. Wonder if it is too late for him to get a refund?
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
2,588
297
83
So the elect could perish? Makes no sense to me. Believe as you wish. I don't agree. That's fine.
To whom was Peter writing his second epistle? The world? No, the elect can never perish, but Peter's original audience was in danger of falling away, hence the warning. Again, pay very close attention to the personal pronouns used in the passage. Also, why would God be longsuffering towards Peter's audience if it was the people of the world that God didn't want to perish? Logically, God should be patient with the people he doesn't want to perish! But that's now how the passage reads.