Salvation Lost? Really?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Aug 5, 2021
125
43
28
John 15:1-2
"I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman. Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit."

John 15:3-4
"Now ye are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you. Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bearfruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me."

John 15:5-6
"I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing. If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned."

Hebrews 3:12-13
"Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God.
But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin."

Luke 8:13
"They on the rock are they, which, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no root, which for a while believe, and in time of temptation fall away."
 

Believer08

Active member
Jan 27, 2025
272
67
28
There are different types of works. (2 Tim. 1:9; Eph. 2:9; Titus 3:5; Jn. 6:29; Jms. 2:14-26; Gal. 519-21; Rev. 2:26; Col. 2:12; Acts 10:34)

I do not believe you can “lose” salvation as in like “whoops! I lost it..where’d it go?” Instead, in the same way we can choose life (Deut. 30:19; cf. Mt. 11:28; Rev. 22:17; Acts 2:37-40, etc etc), one who chooses to become a child of God can also choose to walk away and abandon God (1 Jn. 1:6; Gal. 5:3-4; Heb. 3:14, 6:4-6, 10:26-29; Jn. 15:6; 2 Peter 2:1-2, 22, etc etc). What kind of works justify us? If we are not justified by works, then how can we be judged by them (Rev. 20:12-13; cf. 2 Cor. 5:10; Rom. 2:6; 1 Peter 1:17)

At this point, some will object to say “That’s not what those passages mean; they don’t apply to us, etc etc”, but having to explain to them to someone who is usually caught up in denominational baggage can be a laborious task, as most are close minded to the verses that explicitly teach the exact opposite of what they believe (or what they now believe). It usually goes nowhere, in a senseless debate where no one is going to walk away convinced that the other side is right.

Another argument from them is “they were never saved to begin with, or never truly saved in the first place”, but that’s is a very disturbing thought, because if the same person lived the life you live as a professing Christian, has evidence of salvation, and is considered never saved to begin with because they departed, then what about yourself? How would anyone know who is “truly saved” in that belief? To be consistent, no one would. If any of them depart from the faith, like God says would happen (1 Tim. 4:1), all their OSAS friends will say...they were never saved to begin with. Thus, what is to be considered the security of the believer actually turns into the insecurity for the believer of OSAS, as he/she will live out the remainder of their lives wondering if they are “truly saved”.

In closing, God has done His part in extending His saving grace, and He expects us to receive His saving grace. God also expects us to obey Him (Heb. 5:9).

One last thought…if anyone is advocating a works based salvation, it’s those who believe you cannot forfeit or walk away from salvation, as they are actually relying on their works, because if one doesn’t have any they will say they were never saved. Thus, to remain saved or have evidence that you were saved you must have works, or else you never were saved to begin with.
 

Musicmaster

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
1,414
282
83
You brought up some interesting thoughts.

There are different types of works. (2 Tim. 1:9; Eph. 2:9; Titus 3:5; Jn. 6:29; Jms. 2:14-26; Gal. 519-21; Rev. 2:26; Col. 2:12; Acts 10:34)

I do not believe you can “lose” salvation as in like “whoops! I lost it..where’d it go?” Instead, in the same way we can choose life (Deut. 30:19; cf. Mt. 11:28; Rev. 22:17; Acts 2:37-40, etc etc), one who chooses to become a child of God can also choose to walk away and abandon God (1 Jn. 1:6; Gal. 5:3-4; Heb. 3:14, 6:4-6, 10:26-29; Jn. 15:6; 2 Peter 2:1-2, 22, etc etc).
True indeed. What most assume is that if one chooses to walk away from God, that he is therefore lost. The error of that still goes toward the works-based salvation facet of this gem most call "Christianity." Walking away, staying close...both are based upon the effort motivated by the choices of the person. In other words, the idea that one must "maintain" their faith through their efforts and force of will, that's works, which nullifies this:

2 Corinthians 1:22 Who hath also sealed us, and given the earnest of the Spirit in our hearts.

Ephesians 1:13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,

Ephesians 4:30 And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption.

How powerful is that sealing? Is there any indication in those verses that would cause us to believe the Spirit has a weak grasp in His ability to seal one unto salvation? How does walking away from God break that seal? Is there a verse that speaks of such a phenomenon? The power of sin is the Law, and the power of our sealing is Holy Spirit. The of therefore breaking that seal, if that were ever possible, it would create the dichotomy of works-based salvation so that if by our effort we can break that seal, then salvation is indeed works-based. Holding our salvation is, then, also a works-based possession, of which Paul never once stated to be the case for us today.

What kind of works justify us? If we are not justified by works, then how can we be judged by them (Rev. 20:12-13; cf. 2 Cor. 5:10; Rom. 2:6; 1 Peter 1:17)
Very good question. Given that our salvation is not based upon any works on our part, the judgement of our works is for reward, not salvation itself. If we could merit salvation on the basis of our works, then Christ died for no good reason if we could save ourselves by our works. Given that we cannot save ourselves by our works, then we cannot shove it aside by our efforts and works either. That is to say, it's either totally based upon the merits and power of the Blood of Christ, or it's based upon the strength of our own arm, which is weak and incapable in every way apart from sinning.

At this point, some will object to say “That’s not what those passages mean; they don’t apply to us, etc etc”, but having to explain to them to someone who is usually caught up in denominational baggage can be a laborious task, as most are close minded to the verses that explicitly teach the exact opposite of what they believe (or what they now believe). It usually goes nowhere, in a senseless debate where no one is going to walk away convinced that the other side is right.
As an Israeli, I can say that what you say here is the phenomenon we Jews exhibited throughout our ancient history in our walk before the Lord. We were/are stiff-necked as a people, which the Lord will deal with in His own time in the coming 70th week, with 2/3rds of our numbers on this earth being wiped out, which is the point the Lord returns and save us from total annihilation (Zech. 10-12).

Another argument from them is “they were never saved to begin with, or never truly saved in the first place”, but that’s is a very disturbing thought, because if the same person lived the life you live as a professing Christian, has evidence of salvation, and is considered never saved to begin with because they departed, then what about yourself? How would anyone know who is “truly saved” in that belief? To be consistent, no one would. If any of them depart from the faith, like God says would happen (1 Tim. 4:1), all their OSAS friends will say...they were never saved to begin with. Thus, what is to be considered the security of the believer actually turns into the insecurity for the believer of OSAS, as he/she will live out the remainder of their lives wondering if they are “truly saved”.
More good observations and questions. Given that we cannot earn salvation by our works, we cannot lost it by our works.

1 Corinthians 3:15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.

2 Timothy 2:13 If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself.

Generally speaking, I'm sure some out there have quite a twist of interpretational skills and methods to allegorize this verse into oblivion, thus saying something other than what it states within its context.

In closing, God has done His part in extending His saving grace, and He expects us to receive His saving grace. God also expects us to obey Him (Heb. 5:9).
We are blessed that our salvation isn't based upon any extension of anything. The one who truly believes in the death, burial and resurrection of Christ Jesus on the third day, according to the scriptures, they are sealed with a seal that is nowhere said in scripture to ever be removed. When we are sealed, we are sealed. ..period. The claim that such an observation leads others to live a life of easy-believism, thus conducting themselves any way they want, that's a denial that the work of the Spirit in the life of a true believer is progressing, otherwise known as sanctification. Those who disbelieve in sanctification, and yet believe that one can lose his salvation on the basis of his own effort (works) and will to remain true, that's works-based salvation. That conclusion cannot be escaped from with slick, spiritual sounding jargon and misapplications of various other verses derived from a practice of pitting the word of God against itself.

One last thought…if anyone is advocating a works based salvation, it’s those who believe you cannot forfeit or walk away from salvation, as they are actually relying on their works, because if one doesn’t have any they will say they were never saved. Thus, to remain saved or have evidence that you were saved you must have works, or else you never were saved to begin with.
Incorrect. The other side of this coin that you ignored are those who believe in the power and strength of Holy Spirit to hold us to salvation with a strength far beyond anything this universe, with all its energy, can possibly break. It's the Lord who is faithful to His promise, not us. It's all Him. It would indeed be a matter of works if one could hold his salvation, just as it is works-based salvation if one can walk away from it. That dichotomy is self-defeating.

MM
 

Musicmaster

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
1,414
282
83
The hypotheticals some have dredged up from pure imaginations, of anyone losing their salvation, only one or two have dared try to claim they themselves lost their salvation at some point in the past.

That simply cannot be the case, for if it were, then this would become an issue with the body of Christ, which it is not:

Hebrews 6:4-6
4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost,
5 And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,
6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.

Given that was written to Israel (Hebrews) who were never told in times past that they were sealed by Holy Spirit, the second shame concept was never repeated to the Gentiles through Paul. For Paul to have preached such a message to the Gentile and Jewish believers in his gospel, that would have been a contradiction to his message to them of the sealing of Holy Spirit. There is no danger of a second shame to those who are sealed by Holy Spirit.

MM
 

Believer08

Active member
Jan 27, 2025
272
67
28
As usual, the internet is not a good place for Bible discussions. I find it a waste of time. Fruitless. The majority of parties will not come away with a different view. It is hard to have a cordial online conversation, as digital communication makes it incredibly difficult to detect how the reader is coming across. Some might think it’s coming off rude, when the person is trying to be nice, and that’s one of the main pitfalls with online typed discussions..it comes across in a manner that you’re not intending it.

Instead of having a good conversation, people usually and automatically always want to point out their disagreements they have with someone’s post, crawl down their neck, and when people does that, no one is going to find unity.

The majority of online discussions are going to involve people who both believe they are right no matter what. It is quite pointless to continue in online discussions where it always turns into a back and forth contest, where people want to have the last word, and where it’s never profitable.

People believe what they want to believe. And more than likely no one will convince them otherwise.

Having said that, due to so many passages that teach against the false doctrine of once saved always saved..as well as the passages that teaches salvation is conditional..are my reasons for not believing it

Jn. 15:6; 2 Peter 2:20-22; Jms. 5:19-20; Heb. 3:12, 6:4-6, 10:26-29, Gal. 5:4; Rev. 3:5, Acts 8:22, and many more.

Jn. 10:27, Jn. 8:1, 14:15, 15:4, 6; 1 Jn. 1:7, 4:7-8; Gal. 5:19-21; Col. 1:23; Rev. 2:10; 2 Peter 1:5-10; Rom. 8:1; Acts 14:22; Heb. 5:9, etc etc.

However, I do believe in the eternal security of the Christian believer who follows Jesus. 1 Jn. 5:13; 1 Peter 1:5; Rom. 8:1, 38-39; Eph. 1:13; Heb. 6:19; Jd. 1:1, 24; Jn. 3:16, 5:24, 10:28, etc etc.

Once saved always saved is the false doctrine that teaches it is impossible for a Christian to be lost. It teaches the impossibility of apostasy. Some even believe there’s not a sin one can commit to cause one to lose their soul to be damned.

The eternal security of the believer, however, is found in the scriptures, but not the way Reformed or Protestant theology teaches.
 

Believer08

Active member
Jan 27, 2025
272
67
28
If you are a believer of once saved always saved, and someone for decades has shown to have the SAME EVIDENCE as you of having the promise of eternal salvation by God’s grace, but then they DEPART from the FAITH and are then said to be NEVER saved in the first place, then YOU are essentially implying that the SAME EVIDENCE of the life you live (as well as your very own conversion!!) can be of one that was NEVER SAVED!!! So how does one know whether they are actually saved or not in that line of thinking? If the same person lived the life you lived by having EVIDENCE of salvation, and is considered NEVER saved to begin with because they departed, then how would you not be considered NEVER SAVED as well? Is it because you didn’t depart? But if you do depart, then the life you lived BEFORE you departed (which would be the life of an alleged saved individual) would have been one of NEVER saved? This would have EVERY SINGLE PERSON never being saved before they even depart from the faith. For weeks, months, years, decades, the whole time you thought you had been following Christ, you were not? If that happens to you then your OSAS pals will say you were never saved in the first place. How comforting is that? And if you say it won’t happen to me “because I’m not living in sin”, then you have made salvation CONDITIONAL based on your obedience to Christ. The only difference is, you would say they were never saved, while I would say they were erring.

Suppose someone went to school to become a police officer. They did everything to become an officer. Even have a badge and license to have EVIDENCE they have became one. There’s virtually no question by their instructor, co workers, or by their family members about whether they are an officer. The city they work for considers them to be an officer, otherwise they would have never hired them. They worked as one of their most faithful devoted officers for decades, but overtime, they decide it’s not for them anymore, or they have a bad experience whilst on the job. They quit being a cop. Is anyone going to make the absurd conclusion they were NEVER a cop in the first place? Is the cop that quit going to? What about their family or the instructors who taught them?

Suppose they have a preacher who preached for decades and was involved in missionary work. If he rejects Christianity, then does this mean he was never saved too? If it does, then the people at that congregation who listened to him preach and went with him on missionaries was actually listening to a lost sinner in the pulpit!!! And allowed him to do so all while believing he was saved. Same for missionary trips. The conclusion to the quibble is they have wolves in their congregations and do not even know it. Apparently, the elders thought the preacher was saved since they allowed him to have that position, which is even further proof they do not know who is saved or not. It is also proof that if he was never saved then they would have been in fellowship with someone who was a sinner.

When would he or anyone else know with absolute certainty if he was ever saved? How many other wolves in sheep's clothing like these might be among the congregation where they worship? Is the person beside them? In front of them? Behind them? Is it an elder?

The same people who would say “X” were never saved to begin with would have acknowledged “X” to have been saved, so in actuality they don’t really know who is saved. This would mean the entire time they believed “X” was a brother/sister, they never were, and it shows the whole entire time they thought “X” was saved “X” was lost. So, how do they not know who everyone else they believe is “always saved” is actually just another “X”? If they are honest, no one who believes that doctrine cannot know if they are ever saved, because the same people who say “X” was never saved had all the same evidence as themselves before they began to depart!!

If any of them depart from the faith, like God says would happen (1 Tim. 4:1), all their OSAS friends will say...they were never saved to begin with. Thus, having not lived out his earthly existence, the proponent of "once saved, always saved" is left to question the genuineness of his own salvation. As a result, in their eyes, "the security of the believer" actually refers to a doctrine of "the insecurity of the believer."

These individuals, who believers of OSAS assert to be former Christians, are able to cite the SAME GUARANTEES that they were ONCE SAVED. The same guarantees. They lived out all of that. At one point, some of them were even asked, "How do you know you're Christian?" They would answer the questions with very identical answers that others believers of OSAS do. As the result, sincere Christians with whom they had intimate personal relationships never once regarded them as fakes or hypocrites..that is, until they left…

The once-saved-always-saved crowd finds it extremely difficult to accept someone who they genuinely believed was saved, is no longer saved.

If they were never truly saved, then their accounts of their experiences and beliefs as Christians, along with their assurances that they were genuinely Christian, are extremely disturbing. It appears that their brethren misled them into thinking they were saved when they were not, told them they were saved when they were lost, and believed God saved them when they were lost. Furthermore, by continuing to tell them they were saved, they allowed themselves to be misled throughout, which may cause them to wonder why they were misled the entire time and why God did not truly save them since they were never saved. Such is no security for the believer of once saved always saved.

One is eternally secure until they fall from the faith, but then they were never eternally secure…that makes about as much sense as saying if a soldier departs from the army then they were never a soldier in the army or never had served!! Would anyone say someone was NEVER a soldier in the first place if he went rogue and started killing his own? Someone falling away was "never saved" makes no sense!! I can't "fall" from a place/space I don't occupy. The very idea of saying you fell away because you weren't saved is illogical. If you weren't saved in the first place you fell from nothing!!

I wonder if they would apply that same line of reasoning with themselves? I wonder how consistent they would be. If they themselves depart, would they say they too were never saved?

If so, then when would they know for sure???
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
3,056
696
113
There are different types of works. (2 Tim. 1:9; Eph. 2:9; Titus 3:5; Jn. 6:29; Jms. 2:14-26; Gal. 519-21; Rev. 2:26; Col. 2:12; Acts 10:34)

I do not believe you can “lose” salvation as in like “whoops! I lost it..where’d it go?” Instead, in the same way we can choose life (Deut. 30:19; cf. Mt. 11:28; Rev. 22:17; Acts 2:37-40, etc etc), one who chooses to become a child of God can also choose to walk away and abandon God (1 Jn. 1:6; Gal. 5:3-4; Heb. 3:14, 6:4-6, 10:26-29; Jn. 15:6; 2 Peter 2:1-2, 22, etc etc). What kind of works justify us? If we are not justified by works, then how can we be judged by them (Rev. 20:12-13; cf. 2 Cor. 5:10; Rom. 2:6; 1 Peter 1:17)

At this point, some will object to say “That’s not what those passages mean; they don’t apply to us, etc etc”, but having to explain to them to someone who is usually caught up in denominational baggage can be a laborious task, as most are close minded to the verses that explicitly teach the exact opposite of what they believe (or what they now believe). It usually goes nowhere, in a senseless debate where no one is going to walk away convinced that the other side is right.

Another argument from them is “they were never saved to begin with, or never truly saved in the first place”, but that’s is a very disturbing thought, because if the same person lived the life you live as a professing Christian, has evidence of salvation, and is considered never saved to begin with because they departed, then what about yourself? How would anyone know who is “truly saved” in that belief? To be consistent, no one would. If any of them depart from the faith, like God says would happen (1 Tim. 4:1), all their OSAS friends will say...they were never saved to begin with. Thus, what is to be considered the security of the believer actually turns into the insecurity for the believer of OSAS, as he/she will live out the remainder of their lives wondering if they are “truly saved”.

In closing, God has done His part in extending His saving grace, and He expects us to receive His saving grace. God also expects us to obey Him (Heb. 5:9).

One last thought…if anyone is advocating a works based salvation, it’s those who believe you cannot forfeit or walk away from salvation, as they are actually relying on their works, because if one doesn’t have any they will say they were never saved. Thus, to remain saved or have evidence that you were saved you must have works, or else you never were saved to begin with.
Amen!
 

Musicmaster

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
1,414
282
83
2 Timothy 2:11-13
11 It is a faithful saying: For if we be dead with him, we shall also live with him:
12 If we suffer, we shall also reign with him: if we deny him, he also will deny us:
13 If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself.

The practice of throwing into this topic all manner of hypotheticals, such as, "What about those who walk away from their faith and into sin, and then die in that state?"

Positing a hypothetical is much too easy a weapon to try and brow-beat others into submission to one's own warped dogmas.

Dare we ask the RIGHT question, this can be seen in a different light entirely.

IF/Wen one who was truly saved by grace through faith starts living out sin in their lives, and perhaps even denying Christ and His saving work, what REALLY is such a one challenging?

Perhaps we can agree that IF there were ever a one who allegedly walked away from their faith into unbelief, they are challenging the Lord's faithfulness, which would be a dangerous thing to do in relation to our mortality in this life. How long do you suppose the Lord would allow one to continue living if they choose to challenge the Lord's faithfulness and refusal to deny Himself as a strength of His faithfulness to all true believers?

If we're going dabble in hypotheticals, let's take it further than what the armchair experts have been willing to traipse. How long do you suppose the Lord will allow one to continue in this life while challenging His faithfulness and refusal to deny Himself? I personally don't believe the Lord would put up with such a challenge for testing His faithfulness. It would be better for the Lord to remove such a one from this life after whatever time interval He chooses to put up with such a challenge. Very dangerous indeed. Saved, but snuffed out from this life, perhaps much earlier than they would have lived otherwise.

So, when others think they can prove their point on the basis of mere hypotheticals, never citing a context or stand-alone absolute, it's just clanging and tinkling noises.

MM
 

Believer08

Active member
Jan 27, 2025
272
67
28
Quite simply, what the passage in 2 Timothy 2:13 is teaching is that Jesus is faithful. He remains faithful. He cannot deny Himself. He’s faithful in that He remains the same (Hebrews 13:8). He’s faithful to give the faithful eternal life. He remains faithful in that. But if we deny Him, He will deny us (2 Timothy 2:12, cf. Matthew 10:33). If we are unfaithful and deny Him and persist in unfaithfulness then we will not receive the promise of eternal life. This is not saying Christ is unfaithful, as the promise is still there for us to have, and for anyone that wants to have it, but if anyone rejects the promise then they will not receive it.

Notice the conditions in the verse. “IF”.

1). “For if we died with Him,
We shall also live with Him.” (v11)

2). “If we endure, We shall also reign with Him”

3). “If we deny Him”

If we died with Him. If we endure. If we deny Him.

IF.

What would happen if we don’t die to sin to be made alive in Christ through obedience to the gospel and faithful living? What would happen if we don’t endure? What will happen if we deny Him and don’t repent? Will we have everlasting life? No.

2 Tim. 2:13 does not refer to OSAS. The terms of endurance (2 Timothy 2:12), not choosing to deny the Lord (v.12), and to continue in the faith (to not be faithless, v. 13) shows us otherwise.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
21,015
7,200
113
62
Quite simply, what the passage in 2 Timothy 2:13 is teaching is that Jesus is faithful. He remains faithful. He cannot deny Himself. He’s faithful in that He remains the same (Hebrews 13:8). He’s faithful to give the faithful eternal life. He remains faithful in that. But if we deny Him, He will deny us (2 Timothy 2:12, cf. Matthew 10:33). If we are unfaithful and deny Him and persist in unfaithfulness then we will not receive the promise of eternal life. This is not saying Christ is unfaithful, as the promise is still there for us to have, and for anyone that wants to have it, but if anyone rejects the promise then they will not receive it.

Notice the conditions in the verse. “IF”.

1). “For if we died with Him,
We shall also live with Him.” (v11)

2). “If we endure, We shall also reign with Him”

3). “If we deny Him”

If we died with Him. If we endure. If we deny Him.

IF.

What would happen if we don’t die to sin to be made alive in Christ through obedience to the gospel and faithful living? What would happen if we don’t endure? What will happen if we deny Him and don’t repent? Will we have everlasting life? No.

2 Tim. 2:13 does not refer to OSAS. The terms of endurance (2 Timothy 2:12), not choosing to deny the Lord (v.12), and to continue in the faith (to not be faithless, v. 13) shows us otherwise.
How does this reconcile with...He who hath done a good work in us continuing it until the day of Jesus Christ?
 

Jimbone

Senior Member
Aug 22, 2014
3,179
1,083
113
45
This verse in its context means that anyone who comes to Christ will not be turned away. But OSAS people interpret it as you have.
So what you believe salvation is, is cosmic probation right? So when we are saved Jesus places the full weight of salvation on our shoulders right? His light yolk?
I have no clue what God you're talking about, because the only real God that saved me through Jesus sacrifice on the cross did so in power and assures me that no one can snatch me out of His hand. He transformed and keeps me, I'd hate to have your God that is nothing but a works based burden.
 

Believer08

Active member
Jan 27, 2025
272
67
28
So, what you are saying is Jesus put a “cosmic probation” on people by telling them not to deny Him, to continue in the faith, and to endure? Essentially, you are saying that following Jesus, serving Him, and being loyal to Him by not denying, by continuing, etc etc is having the full weight of salvation on our shoulders? Mercy…suppose your wife says “do not deny that I’m your wife, continue in the love we have, and to endure the bad times that life brings us, etc etc..if you are unfaithful and leave me, then you will not have a life with me”, would you say she was placing “cosmic probation” on you where the full weight of your marriage was on your shoulders? Of course not, as a wife expects that out of her husband. Yet, you would say that about Jesus when one simply gives or emphasizes other points in scripture.
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
3,056
696
113
2 Timothy 2:11-13
11 It is a faithful saying: For if we be dead with him, we shall also live with him:
12 If we suffer, we shall also reign with him: if we deny him, he also will deny us:
13 If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself.

The practice of throwing into this topic all manner of hypotheticals, such as, "What about those who walk away from their faith and into sin, and then die in that state?"

Positing a hypothetical is much too easy a weapon to try and brow-beat others into submission to one's own warped dogmas.

Dare we ask the RIGHT question, this can be seen in a different light entirely.

IF/Wen one who was truly saved by grace through faith starts living out sin in their lives, and perhaps even denying Christ and His saving work, what REALLY is such a one challenging?

Perhaps we can agree that IF there were ever a one who allegedly walked away from their faith into unbelief, they are challenging the Lord's faithfulness, which would be a dangerous thing to do in relation to our mortality in this life. How long do you suppose the Lord would allow one to continue living if they choose to challenge the Lord's faithfulness and refusal to deny Himself as a strength of His faithfulness to all true believers?

If we're going dabble in hypotheticals, let's take it further than what the armchair experts have been willing to traipse. How long do you suppose the Lord will allow one to continue in this life while challenging His faithfulness and refusal to deny Himself? I personally don't believe the Lord would put up with such a challenge for testing His faithfulness. It would be better for the Lord to remove such a one from this life after whatever time interval He chooses to put up with such a challenge. Very dangerous indeed. Saved, but snuffed out from this life, perhaps much earlier than they would have lived otherwise.

So, when others think they can prove their point on the basis of mere hypotheticals, never citing a context or stand-alone absolute, it's just clanging and tinkling noises.

MM
I do not associate much with non-Christians, but I have personally known at least three who "walked away", and as far as I know continued to live physically.

Do you know some who walked away and then died soon afterward?
 

Believer08

Active member
Jan 27, 2025
272
67
28
OSAS has no security!!!!

Are any of them absolutely, positively certain without a doubt they are saved at this very moment???

Of course they’d say yes…

But…

If any of them depart from their faith, all their OSAS friends will say...

You were NEVER saved to begin with!!

So, according to their view, it is possible for someone to believe they are saved but not be!!!

They have NO SECURITY!!!
 

Musicmaster

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
1,414
282
83
Quite simply, what the passage in 2 Timothy 2:13 is teaching is that Jesus is faithful. He remains faithful. He cannot deny Himself. He’s faithful in that He remains the same (Hebrews 13:8). He’s faithful to give the faithful eternal life. He remains faithful in that. But if we deny Him, He will deny us (2 Timothy 2:12, cf. Matthew 10:33). If we are unfaithful and deny Him and persist in unfaithfulness then we will not receive the promise of eternal life. This is not saying Christ is unfaithful, as the promise is still there for us to have, and for anyone that wants to have it, but if anyone rejects the promise then they will not receive it.

Notice the conditions in the verse. “IF”.

1). “For if we died with Him,
We shall also live with Him.” (v11)

2). “If we endure, We shall also reign with Him”

3). “If we deny Him”

If we died with Him. If we endure. If we deny Him.

IF.

What would happen if we don’t die to sin to be made alive in Christ through obedience to the gospel and faithful living? What would happen if we don’t endure? What will happen if we deny Him and don’t repent? Will we have everlasting life? No.

2 Tim. 2:13 does not refer to OSAS. The terms of endurance (2 Timothy 2:12), not choosing to deny the Lord (v.12), and to continue in the faith (to not be faithless, v. 13) shows us otherwise.
When you speak of obedience in any sense of effort to keep from losing salvation, in the event one truly believed Paul's Gospel message about salvation by grace through faith, that is a works-based salvation, which is non-existent.

When one is sealed by Holy Spirit, they are sealed. Nowhere does scripture even hint at the idea of Holy Spirit has any weakness in that seal upon a true believer.

Do you know someone who has truly lost their salvation? If so, then how do you know they lost it? Did you ever lose yours? How did you lose it? How do you know you lost it? What do you think that you DO in order to keep it intact? If we can keep our salvation through obedience and works, then that's a belief in our being more powerful than Holy Spirit and more faithful than Christ Himself.

MM
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
3,056
696
113
When you speak of obedience in any sense of effort to keep from losing salvation, in the event one truly believed Paul's Gospel message about salvation by grace through faith, that is a works-based salvation, which is non-existent.

When one is sealed by Holy Spirit, they are sealed. Nowhere does scripture even hint at the idea of Holy Spirit has any weakness in that seal upon a true believer.

Do you know someone who has truly lost their salvation? If so, then how do you know they lost it? Did you ever lose yours? How did you lose it? How do you know you lost it? What do you think that you DO in order to keep it intact? If we can keep our salvation through obedience and works, then that's a belief in our being more powerful than Holy Spirit and more faithful than Christ Himself.

MM
How do you know that you are saved? How do you know salvation is not by works? How do you know who is sealed by Holy Spirit?
Do you know someone who has truly been saved? If not, then how do you know they can't be?
How do you know you are saved? How do you know you won't ever reject it?
What do you think that you DO in order to keep it intact? Uhh, we moved from papal infallibility to faith/belief at this point.

If we can reject our salvation through disobedience and wicked works, then that's a belief in our being weaker than Holy Spirit and less faithful than Christ Himself.