Your conclusion does not follow logically from your premises. It does not follow that because Jesus was critical of their motives for coming (John 6:26), therefore "No one can come to Me unless the Father draws him" (18 verses later in John 6:44) means "No one can
believe in Me unless the Father draws him." You are wresting John 6:44 out of its immediate context and stapling it to 6:26, to gerrymander an argument that supports your theological presuppostions.
Jhn 6:26 Jesus answered them and said, Verily, verily, I say to you, You seek me, not because you saw the miracles, but because you did eat of the loaves, and were filled.
Jhn 6:27 Labour not for the meat which perishes, but for that meat which endures to everlasting life, which the Son of man shall give to you: for him has God the Father sealed.
Jhn 6:28 Then said they to him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?
Jhn 6:29 Jesus answered and said to them, This is the work of God, so that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.
Jhn 6:30 They said therefore unto him, What sign show you then, that we may see, and believe you? what do you work?
The plain reading of the text is that Jesus criticises their motive in seeking Him, because it was merely to fill their bellies (v.26).
Jesus presents them with the correct motive for seeking Him: labour (
ergazesthe: present imperative, keep on making an effort) to come seeking for imperishable food that endures to aeonous life. (v.27)
They ask what they must do in order to keep on working (
ergazometha: present deponent subjunctive) the works (
erga) God requires. (v. 28)
Jesus tells them what they are doing, putting in an effort to seek out Jesus, is the work of God, the purpose of which is to bring them to faith in Him (v.29) through seeing the miracles (v.26) and hearing the words of life that He is speaking (v.27) to those who are coming to Him.
They then ask for a sign that will help them believe He is truly sent by God. (v.30)
There is no indication here that only those chosen by God for eventual rebirth are coming to Jesus "for the right motives", and the rest of those coming to Jesus here are not really coming to Jesus, if they are not coming for the purpose of listening attentively to His teaching in order to be brought to faith in Jesus.
Jhn 6:35 And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that comes to Me shall never hunger; and he that believes on Me shall never thirst.
I would suggest that the fact that Jesus distinguishes between "coming to Him" to receive the bread of life (Himself), and "believing in Him" to receive the water of life (the Holy Spirit) would militate strongly against your thesis that coming to Jesus and believing in Jesus are synonyms. It seems plain from the text that the people described in John 6 are being attracted to Jesus by the Father through the words and deeds Jesus is doing in the Father's power. The aim is that people who keep coming to Jesus He will keep on distributing to them the words of life. And that those who keep coming and keep listening will eventually believe He is the Messiah promised in Moses and the other Old Covenant prophets, including John the Baptist. And that those who believe in Jesus and receive Him as Messiah, He will give the Holy Spirit.
It may
seem so to you, Rufus. But efficacious grace (Grace that cannot be rejected) is not a biblical "thing". Enabling someone to do something does not have tio mean compelling them to do it. Giving someone an invitation to an exclusive party, enables them to come, but it does not amount to your concept of efficacious grace. Building a bailey bridge over a river when a flood has washed out the original bridge, enables people to cross the river by car, but it does not compel them to do so.
Certainly, a lack of love for the Son would be instrumental in their not believing on Him.
In koinE Greek, "the love
of God", or God's love (agapEn theou: genitive case) is not the same as "love
for God" (agapEn thOi: dative case).