Are we headed to civil war?
- Thread starter ZNP
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
What an odd thing if we think about it. It is crazy to commit murder, so this type of crazy should be capitally punished.
There's no need for martial law.
There are groups of criminals that are committing acts of warfare and felonies. The police in those cities should be able to handle it.
The BLM warfare was paid for by Soros and his teams carried it out in a very organized manner. Then antifa, which were paramilitarized soy boys and drug addicts according to US military Intel. This is more of the same.
They are dangerous, but if anyone asked me, I would have put together teams of dedicated men that could have solved the problems in those cities under proper lawful chain of command. Conservatively speaking, not bragging, it would be very doable.
Why others have not must be a political battle.
The only advice I offer to anyone who is unfortunate to live in a city is to go to work properly armed and avoid areas of crime and political activity.
'MOSTLY PEACEFUL': Report reveals SHOCKING number of times leftist media downplayed riots
"These protests are mostly peaceful and the violence that does exist was provoked by the authorities"
Here let's make it more depressing about how the system actually works,
the government prints money because it does not have any money of its own and then it collects taxes to attempt to keep down the level of debt from getting too high.
So in reality, your tax dollars are not at work but actually more like making the lowest payment on a VISA card.
Remember before you cut me off because you have a economics background. I was talking about Keynesian economics being the most widely accepted then specified even more by saying it is what governments are actually using.
To save time you have to go look at deficit spending and how government spending drives and influences an economy.
Government creates money. Taxes are their way to create demand for the money they create. A good example and to keep it brief was early America prior, during, and post the Revolutionary war. America used different currencies the Spanish dollar also known as piece of eight. Also used was the French franc not as heavily but in areas that were part of the previous French colonial empire. They used Dutch Lion Daalders also known as dog dollars and where we get the name dollar from. As well as we used the pound.
The Spanish dollar and the English pound were the most widely used. So how do you create demand for any currency you want to use for a medium of exchange. You create a tax obligation in a specific currency creating a demand for that currency so that people can meet their tax obligation.
Money is created by demand 90% of money is created by credit. You go to the bank and say I want to buy a house. The bank creates a IOU a credit for the amount. Which when it creates it they create a asset and a liability. An asset because they hold an IOU and a liability because they have to deposit the amount into your account. Same for the individual it also becomes an asset because now they can spend the credit in their account and a liability because they have to pay it back.
Same with government as individuals an asset and liability. Government when they borrow or create money their liability is auctioned off. It is sold as bonds. Bonds can be callable what that is say company x wants to build a new factory to produce more widgets to sell because the demand for widgets is greater than their ability to produce them. So company x will sell bonds to raise the capital to build. Their bonds will be callable in other words if demand for widgets is great. They will call in their bonds before maturity or pay you back your principal before maturity. They do this to save money by paying less interest on their bonds by calling them before maturity.
Government does not do this as they are competing in the market place for money. So their bonds are not callable you will earn the interest known as the coupon during it's lifetime. Then at maturity you will be paid back your principal amount. Along with their ability to pay the interest and principal. Their bonds also being noncallable is a big selling point to buying them.
So taxes don't directly go to paying back the debt it is used more to pay the interest on the debt. Recall in a earlier post you had posted a tweet about Treasury doing a buyback. This is where this comes into play they can buy back debt and reissue it at a lower interest rate or buy it back to ensure that different issuances have the same maturity date.
So for example lets take the tariffs. You can make it so that a certain amount of debt comes due on the same maturity date and then is retired using the money from the tariffs. Since you know when you will receive the tariffs you set the maturity date to coincide with the date you collect.
However, this will never happen because the world's current financing model is government deficit spending. So government debt is paid off buy borrowing. This model is supposed to create an aggerate greater demand which in theory should create jobs and stimulate private sector activity. However, it has been the opposite as it makes government grow and does a poor job of creating new tax revenue. For example government will create a job then say pay the person a 100 dollars then tax that person 15 dollars.
So anyway why I have in prior post advocated for trying a new economic model instead of continuing to do what we and the rest of the world have been doing since the 30's which is just not working.
I hope this makes sense as I tried to keep it as short as possible but was still longer than I had hoped..........LOL
I have heard that one major problem does exist with fixing all these problems thru the whole US. 'Funding'. They don't have the money. And yet the enemie has all the money they need from selling drugs and sex.
I am wondering how one cuts someone off on a discussion board.
To paraphrase you had said something along the lines of I have a economics background and I am out of here or bye, something to that effect. Clearly you did not want to engage anymore in the convo so yea cut me off or shut me down to your interest to continue.
I said goodbye when you embarked on this diatribe....
I am wondering how one cuts someone off on a discussion board.
I wonder if balancing a checkbook, or using an ATM constitutes 'a background in economics.'
Yes and I respect your wishes so did not engage further. However, I stand by what I said because it is factual and accurate. To understand further just how accurate. Take a look at the sexual revolution and the following cultural war of feminism vs masculinity.
The growth of feelings being the driving force to making decisions. The lack of accountability that has arose from it. Abortion to name one. Growth of debt from the state becoming the husband. Death of the family under the wisdom of I don't need a man.
Lower wages by the expansion of the labor force, the expansion of consumerism by marrying a woman to a job. The low birth rate that is inadequate to replace current population, that also comes along with.
That is what the current political climate is when you truly break it down by the demographics. Left ideology is predominately feminism which will lead to socialist and Marxist. Right ideology is predominately patriarchal which tends to accountability and self reliance.
This is truly the break down. The current climate that is at the heart of a possible civil war. Feminism vs the patriarchy. Which statistically we can say so because the make up of the latest vote count. The largest demographic to vote for left ideology is women and single educated women along with low testosterone men. The largest demographic to vote right is male and a tendency for the women that vote right to be married.
Self reflection and going back over the the things you have posted and read them should be proof enough to you what side you fall upon and the accuracy of what I posted to you.
Left leadership clearly understands this is the case why they are spending 20 million dollars to try and figure out how they can get the male vote.
Self reflection and going back over the the things you have posted and read them should be proof enough to you what side you fall upon and the accuracy of what I posted to you.
Suffice to say .. this is all projection on your part and viewed through a left-right, polarized lens which is destroying your country.
The thinking goes like this....... oh you do not support genocide and are not a war monger, not in support of lying politicians and crony capitalism and western imperialism...
well then I must rightly fully conclude and pigeon hole you as >>>>> leftist, feminist, pro-abortion, woke, Marxist, socialist, anti-s*m*te, non-Christian.
It really is sad, thankfully there are many on other forums who have escaped the absolutely destructive dialect.
