Does Rom 5:18 teach that Christ died for all men without exception ?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 23, 2016
7,183
1,741
113
Those Christ brought justification upon was by His one act. Nothing about requiring Faith. Please show me the word Faith in Rom 5:18
here's a quote that is quite fitting here:


Romans 5:1 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ
.
 
Nov 21, 2020
7,206
687
113
Does 1 Tim 4:10

10 For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

Does this verse teach that God in Christ is the Saviour of all men without exception? By no means, that is a contradiction of scripture, lost men don't have God as a Saviour, duh!

Instead the verse teaches limited atonement just like the Truth is in Christ Jesus. The word especially here is a adverb and it actually is a qualifier of who God in Christ is a Saviour unto. The word means:

most of all, especially.

málista (from mala, "very much") – very much the case; particularly so; especially (mostly) so.

See that, its teaching particular salvation, Hes a Saviour particularly to them believing. The word especially also means, exclusively. So God is Saviour exclusively and particularly to believers, whether jew or gentile.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
3,735
792
113
It would be nice to see you do some actual work rather than misinterpreting single verses to read your erroneous theology into them.

It's also interesting to watch you selectively define words when you think they might help your error but not when they won't, such as Rom5:17 "receive".

When we look at malista a good way to consider it is with the concept of sets and subsets. It doesn't negate the set (the whole) - it simply brings focus to the subset within the set.

Paul uses it about 8x in his writings to bring a narrow focus - to highlight a focus - on a subset within a set. He uses it 3x this way in 1Tim and this is the same 1Tim in which 1Tim2:4 tells us God's desire is the Salvation of all men. So, this 1Tim4:10 fits perfectly with 1Tim2:4. It also fits perfectly with Paul's other writing in Rom5:17-19 that you're stubbornly misinterpreting for us.

What God our Savior did to save was sufficient for all. What God our Savior requires is willing receipt of His Grace by Faith.

It's really not that difficult to take hold of.

Maybe this will assist you: There are many promoting error in these threads, especially you.
 
Nov 21, 2020
7,206
687
113
rolleyes ... when I (or others who have posted on this thread) point out what Scripture says concerning faith (Rom 5:1) and/or receiving (lambanō ) (Rom 5:17) in relation to Rom 5:18, your response is:





however, when the omission of words is on your part ... oh, "its implied" ... hypocrisy on full display ...





the lack of spiritual discernment is wholly on the side of the one who attempts to align Scripture to his or her dogma ... rather than believe Scripture and throw out all dogma which does not align with Scripture.

1 Thessalonians 5:21 Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.
.
Yeah its implied, Its about Christ isnt it ?
 
Nov 21, 2020
7,206
687
113
again ... what you claim here completely contradicts what you claimed in Post 21:

"Those under condemnation cant be Justified as Per Rom 5:18"





The record in John 3:25-31 relates to the ministry of John as the forerunner to the Lord Jesus Christ. John's father, Zachariah, prophesied when John was 8 days old: Luke 1:76 And thou, child, shalt be called the prophet of the Highest: for thou shalt go before the face of the Lord to prepare his ways.


John 1:6-8 There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light.





clearly not all receive ... God gave His Son to be the savior of the whole world ... yet not all "receive". Those who reject what God has given do not receive the gift of salvation God has given.





Read the verses just prior ... Peter preached the gospel ... which is the power of God unto salvation to those who believe.

Cornelius and his house believed the gospel ... and they received the Holy Spirit through faith ... same as you (if you believe ... I really can't tell if you believe because of statements you have made which indicate you don't have to believe).





In Acts 11:17, Peter was speaking before those who were of the circumcision [Jews] and who contended with him because he had gone in to men uncircumcised, and didst eat with them.

Acts 11:17 corroborates that God gives the gift to those who believe in the Lord Jesus Christ.

Acts 11:17 Forasmuch then as God gave them the like gift as he did unto us, who believed on the Lord Jesus Christ; what was I, that I could withstand God?





God has sovereignly determined that He will give His gift(s) to whoever He desires. who are you to tell God who He can or cannot give gifts to?

God has sovereignly determined that those who come to Him by faith will receive that which He has freely given.

God has sovereignly determined that those who suppress the truth in unrighteousness will remain under condemnation.





do you?





your surmisings do not change the meaning of the Greek word lambanō. I did not "make up" the definition of the Greek Word. You don't like the definition of the Greek word, so you come up with mind-twisting renderings like "receiving is an effectual giving".

faith is what actively lays hold of that which God in His grace and mercy gifts to mankind. Those who do not lay hold are the ones who remain under condemnation.
.
Rom 5 in its entirety is about the Elect of God. About their solidarity and the results of it with #1 Adam and #2 with Christ
 
Nov 21, 2020
7,206
687
113
here's a quote that is quite fitting here:


Romans 5:1 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ
.
Those Christ brought justification upon was by His one act. Nothing about requiring Faith. Please show me the word Faith in Rom 5:18

And Faith in Rom 5:1 is Christ, His work from Rom 4:25 when He rose for their Justification. And again its about the elect. There is only one people promised Justification in the Lord, Israel Gods elect Isa 45:25

In the Lord shall all the seed of Israel be justified, and shall glory.

Those Justified by Faith/Christ in Rom 5:1 is all the seed Rom 4:16

16 Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all,

Of course this is way above your head.
 
Nov 21, 2020
7,206
687
113
It would be nice to see you do some actual work rather than misinterpreting single verses to read your erroneous theology into them.

It's also interesting to watch you selectively define words when you think they might help your error but not when they won't, such as Rom5:17 "receive".

When we look at malista a good way to consider it is with the concept of sets and subsets. It doesn't negate the set (the whole) - it simply brings focus to the subset within the set.

Paul uses it about 8x in his writings to bring a narrow focus - to highlight a focus - on a subset within a set. He uses it 3x this way in 1Tim and this is the same 1Tim in which 1Tim2:4 tells us God's desire is the Salvation of all men. So, this 1Tim4:10 fits perfectly with 1Tim2:4. It also fits perfectly with Paul's other writing in Rom5:17-19 that you're stubbornly misinterpreting for us.

What God our Savior did to save was sufficient for all. What God our Savior requires is willing receipt of His Grace by Faith.

It's really not that difficult to take hold of.

Maybe this will assist you: There are many promoting error in these threads, especially you.
False teaching
 
Nov 21, 2020
7,206
687
113
here's a quote that is quite fitting here:


Romans 5:1 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ
.
Gill on Rom 5:1 with understanding,

Therefore being justified by faith,.... Not that faith is at the first of our justification; for that is a sentence which passed in the mind of God from all eternity, and which passed on Christ, and on all the elect considered in him, when he rose from the dead; see Romans 4:25; nor is it the chief, or has it the chief place in justification; it is not the efficient cause of it, it is God that justifies, and not faith; it is not the moving cause of it, that is the free grace of God; it is not the matter of it, that is the righteousness of Christ: we are not justified by faith, either as God's work in us, for, as such, it is a part of sanctification; nor as our work or act, as exercised by us, for then we should be justified by works, by something of our own, and have whereof to glory; but we are justified by faith objectively and relatively, as that relates to the object Christ, and his righteousness; or as it is a means of our knowledge, and perception of our justification by Christ's righteousness, and of our enjoying the comfort of it; and so we come to
have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
3,735
792
113
So, we use a Reformed theologian to substantiate Reformed theology. That's helpful.

Can you explain your red highlighted portion? Do you know if other traditions agree or disagree with it in part or in totality? Do you think others don't agree that the object of Faith has the merit?

BTW, your response to info on malista was profound.
 
Nov 21, 2020
7,206
687
113
So, we use a Reformed theologian to substantiate Reformed theology. That's helpful.

Can you explain your red highlighted portion? Do you know if other traditions agree or disagree with it in part or in totality? Do you think others don't agree that the object of Faith has the merit?

BTW, your response to info on malista was profound.
I have explained enough to be a faithful witness to Christ
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
3,735
792
113
I have explained enough to be a faithful witness to Christ
I do think intent is certainly part of faithfulness. But you're resting on clear errors in interpreting Scripture and taking stubborn stands against some good input from some here.

Do yourself and us a favor and at least look at Paul's use of malista and consider what I pointed out about it. I'll work through it with you if you'd like. We can start in the 1Tim usages. It's a pretty simple study.
 
Nov 21, 2020
7,206
687
113
I do think intent is certainly part of faithfulness. But you're resting on clear errors in interpreting Scripture and taking stubborn stands against some good input from some here.

Do yourself and us a favor and at least look at Paul's use of malista and consider what I pointed out about it. I'll work through it with you if you'd like. We can start in the 1Tim usages. It's a pretty simple study.
What I have took time to explain you have scoffed and rejected. I have looked at malista over a 100 x over the past 40 years, Im settled with my understanding of it.
 
Mar 23, 2016
7,183
1,741
113
Does 1 Tim 4:10

10 For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

Does this verse teach that God in Christ is the Saviour of all men without exception?
yes ... the Lord Jesus Christ is the only One Who can save ... none other ... there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.




brightfame52 said:
By no means, that is a contradiction of scripture, lost men don't have God as a Saviour, duh!
Adam Clarke Commentary:

Who is the Savior of all men – Who has provided salvation for the whole human race, and has freely offered it to them in his word and by his Spirit.
Specially of those that believe – What God intends for All, he actually gives to them that believe in Christ, who died for the sins of the world, and tasted death for every man. As all have been purchased by his blood so all may believe; and consequently all may be saved. Those that perish, perish through their own fault.
.
.
 
Mar 23, 2016
7,183
1,741
113
Rom 5 in its entirety is about the Elect of God.
there is only one Elect of God (capital E) ... and that is the Lord Jesus Christ. All born again believers are in Him Who is the Elect ... born again believers are "elect" (small e).


Romans 5:18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.

if "Rom 5 in its entirety is about the elect of God" ...

then only the elect of God are condemned and in need of justification ...

so then the nonelect are not condemned because, according to you, "Rom 5 in its entirety is about the elect of God" ...

your assertion fails




About their solidarity and the results of it with #1 Adam and #2 with Christ
"their solidarity and the results of it with #1 Adam" means that judgment came upon [the elect] to condemnation ... which renders your claim submitted in Post 21 that "Those under condemnation cant be Justified" to be in error.

another failure due to your erroneous dogma ...
.
 

Pilgrimshope

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2020
16,067
6,458
113
Rom 5:18

18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.

No by no means does Rom 5:18 teach that Christ died for all without exception, just because the word all is used. In fact, to the spiritually discerning it teaches the contrary, it teaches the limited atonement, or that Christ did not die for all men without exception, simply because the all men here that Justification of life came upon is limited to only some men, so the word all can only apply to all that received upon them Justification of life.

For its clear from other scripture that all men without exception are Justified before God, for instance Matt 5:45

45 That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.

Acts 24:15

And have hope toward God, which they themselves also allow, that there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust.

1 Cor 6:1

Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints?

2 Pet 2:9

9 The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished:

Rev 22:11

11 He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still.

Now the word unjust does mean being found guilty before God, in Gods court of law,

describes being found guilty in God's court of law, i.e. as a binding, legal infraction against His law which calls for divine retribution,
unjust, unrighteous, wicked.of one who breaks God's laws, unrighteous, sinful,

So basically its one God reckons guilty before Him as a law beaker.
“So basically it’s one God reckons guilty before Him as a law beaker.”

so …..everyone then

“Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.”
‭‭Romans‬ ‭3:19‬ ‭KJV‬‬
 

Pilgrimshope

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2020
16,067
6,458
113
I don't see how he didn't die for all men in what you posted, the mere fact it literally says so should be enough. when I read his word I often ask myself as to not add any personal interpretation is that what it says? or I imagine Jesus and him asking is that what I said?
“I don't see how he didn't die for all men”

“and he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for our's only, but also for the sins of the whole world.”
‭‭1 John‬ ‭2:2‬ ‭KJV‬‬

“For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.”
‭‭1 Timothy‬ ‭4:10‬ ‭

“For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.”
‭‭1 Timothy‬ ‭2:3-4‬ ‭KJV‬‬

“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”
‭‭John‬ ‭3:16‬ ‭

“And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved;

but he that believeth not shall be damned.”
‭‭Mark‬ ‭16:15-16‬ ‭KJV‬‬

it covers everyone but some reject him
 

brightfame52

Well-known member
Nov 21, 2020
7,206
687
113
The All in Rom 5:18 corresponds to the many in Rom 5:19, and many can't and doesn't mean all without exception!