Contrasting Israel with the Church

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

randyk

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2021
1,218
356
83
Pacific NW USA
This is a nice exchange of ideas with someone who shared some basic truths of the Gospel, in contrast with the failures of Judaism....

Someone said:
In these verses we see a man who, although at one time was full of hatred, now displays love for his fellow man. As a one time zealous Pharisee, Paul understands the blindness of the Israelites to the Gospel. He now understands following a religion does not equate to salvation. Paul’s conversion led to his understand of how Jesus had fulfilled the Law, thereby being the only way to God as Jesus Himself stated in John 14:6: Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”

Continuing, Paul then teaches concerning righteousness:

“5 Moses writes this about the righteousness that is by the law: “The person who does these things will live by them.” 6 But the righteousness that is by faith says: “Do not say in your heart, ‘Who will ascend into heaven?’” (that is, to bring Christ down) 7 “or ‘Who will descend into the deep?’” (that is, to bring Christ up from the dead). 8 But what does it say? “The word is near you; it is in your mouth and in your heart,” that is, the message concerning faith that we proclaim”

In the following verse’s, Paul proclaims the fundamentals of salvation in Jesus Christ:

“9 If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you profess your faith and are saved. 11 As Scripture says, “Anyone who believes in him will never be put to shame.” 12 For there is no difference between Jew and Gentile —the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all who call on him, 13 for, “Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.””

Declaring Jesus is Lord was - and still is - a bold declaration. At that time in history Caesar was lord across the empire. To declare another lord was treason, and grounds for death. Notwithstanding, God has proclaimed Jesus to be Lord of all because, He is the only One who has attained Salvation for all who believe.

As believers we are called upon to share our faith:

“14 How, then, can they call on the one they have not believed in? And how can they believe in the one of whom they have not heard? And how can they hear without someone preaching to them? 15 And how can anyone preach unless they are sent? As it is written: “How beautiful are the feet of those who bring good news!””

The following verses enforce the critical importance of sharing The Good News of The Gospel:

“16 But not all the Israelites accepted the good news. For Isaiah says, “Lord, who has believed our message?” 17 Consequently, faith comes from hearing the message, and the message is heard through the word about Christ. 18 But I ask: Did they not hear? Of course they did:
“Their voice has gone out into all the earth,
their words to the ends of the world.””

In conclusion, Paul writes of how the Gospel message has gone out the the Gentiles:

“19 Again I ask: Did Israel not understand? First, Moses says,
“I will make you envious by those who are not a nation;
I will make you angry by a nation that has no understanding.”
20 And Isaiah boldly says,
“I was found by those who did not seek me;
I revealed myself to those who did not ask for me.”
21 But concerning Israel he says,
“All day long I have held out my hands
to a disobedient and obstinate people.””


I responded:
There is a lot I could comment on here. Pretty well stated, although my theological concerns carry on to certain issues I've had to deal with in other places. So I'll just briefly outline how I view these things in that regard.

Paul understood that the Jewish practice of the Law was intended to show the perfect righteousness of Christ as opposed to the flawed righteousness of Israel. This meant that although Israel's righteousness was accepted of God, resulting in spiritual life and blessing, it was insufficient to obtain Eternal Life.

What makes all righteousness acceptable in God's sight is faith, even from flawed human beings. Israel was told that God's word was near them, indicating they could do what brought life to them. It could not, however, do what Christ did, which is to be raised from the dead and to ascend into heaven.

All true ministers of the Gospel are equipped with the ability to share God's living word with others which, if accepted, can bring them Eternal Life through Jesus Christ. Those who just share empty knowledge of the Gospel are no better than Israel when, after years of repetition and compromise, began to lose their track with God's word that had been near them.

None of this means that Israel was always faulty in their spiritual life. It's just that Israel, along with all nations, fall into spiritual decline over time. This has happened to Christian nations in the NT era.

We should not create too big a contrast between Israel in the OT and the Church in the NT--the results are the same. We begin well and end badly. The system of God's word is the same. But the problem is that society loses God's word over time, since the majority tend to fall away from God's word and from its life.

When Israel fell away from God, through idolatry, God restored them with their repentance. Even today I believe Israel can be restored as a godly nation, just as many Christian nations have fallen into backsliding but have experienced reformations and revivals, restoring their Christian blessing.

The problem with Israel has been, they have had repeated failures, and came, in the time of Christ, to a hardening of their hearts. This could happen to Christians in the NT era too--they just haven't fallen as far as Israel did yet, though that may be coming.

In my personal opinion, I don't think we should give up on either Israel or Christian nations. Hardened hearts require severe chastisement, and judgment against the causes. But Christ came to die for the worst, hardened heart. And we should maintain that charitable attitude towards all, as I see it.

On another issue you raised, I will say that I think Pontius Pilate was less offended at Jesus' claim to be Lord because he said his Kingdom was of heaven, and not in competition with Caesar. It was recognized that his word was true and not covert or deceptive.

So, there was no real threat to the Roman Empire in the sense of military challenge or usurpation. Ultimately, the Roman Empire converted, and obtained the spiritual Kingdom that Israel had lost.

I personally believe Israel has a chance to come back as a nation that it was originally called to be, commiting itself to being a godly nation, a Christian nation. But I understand that idea is controversial within Christianity, and I will not make this too big of an issue here.

Thank you for a nice post! A good one is one that provokes or encourages a positive reaction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: homwardbound
I personally believe Israel has a chance to come back as a nation that it was originally called to be, commiting itself to being a godly nation, a Christian nation. But I understand that idea is controversial within Christianity, and I will not make this too big of an issue here.

It never has been and never will be God's intent or desire to have an earthly nation ruled by men. There's only one word for wanting such - rebellion.

And [the elders of Israel] said unto him [Samuel], Behold, thou art old, and thy sons walk not in thy ways: now make us a king to judge us like all the nations. But the thing displeased Samuel, when they said, Give us a king to judge us. And Samuel prayed unto the LORD. And the LORD said unto Samuel, Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee: for they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me, that I should not reign over them. 1 Samuel 8:5-7​
​
And ye shall cry out in that day because of your king which ye shall have chosen you; and the LORD will not hear you in that day. Nevertheless the people refused to obey the voice of Samuel; and they said, Nay; but we will have a king over us; That we also may be like all the nations; and that our king may judge us, and go out before us, and fight our battles. 1 Samuel 8:18-20​
 
Samuel spoke all the words of the LORD to the people who were asking him for a king. 11He said,
“This will be the manner of the king who will reign over you: He will take your sons and appoint
them to serve his own chariots and horses, and to run in front of his chariots.

12He will appoint some for himself as commanders of thousands and of fifties, and others to plow
his ground, to reap his harvest, and to make his weapons of war and equipment for his chariots.

13And he will take your daughters to be perfumers, cooks, and bakers.

14He will take the best of your fields and vineyards and olive groves and give them to his servants.
15He will take a tenth of your grain and grape harvest and give it to his officials and servants. 16And he
will take your menservants and maidservants and your best cattleb and donkeys and put them to his own use.

17He will take a tenth of your flocks, and you yourselves will become his slaves.
18When that day comes, you will beg for relief from the king you have chosen, but the LORD will not answer you on that day.”

19Nevertheless, the people refused to listen to Samuel. “No!” they said. “We must have a king over us.
20Then we will be like all the other nations, with a king to judge us, to go out before us, and to fight our battles.”

21Samuel listened to all the words of the people and repeated them in the hearing of the LORD.

22“Listen to their voice,” the LORD said to Samuel. “Appoint a king for them.”

 
from-Matthew20-25-28.png

from Matthew 20 verses 25-28 (Mark 10 verses 43-45, Luke 22 verses 26-27) ~ Jesus said, “You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their superiors exercise authority over them. It shall not be this way among you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first among you must be your slave- just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for many.”
 
It never has been and never will be God's intent or desire to have an earthly nation ruled by men. There's only one word for wanting such - rebellion.

I could just as easily say that you're rebelling against God because that is exactly what He did during the Davidic Kingdom, and precisely what He promised Abraham--the nation Israel and many nations serving the God of Abraham.

How easily you dismiss history and the promises of God!

And [the elders of Israel] said unto him [Samuel], Behold, thou art old, and thy sons walk not in thy ways: now make us a king to judge us like all the nations. But the thing displeased Samuel, when they said, Give us a king to judge us. And Samuel prayed unto the LORD. And the LORD said unto Samuel, Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee: for they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me, that I should not reign over them. 1 Samuel 8:5-7​
​
And ye shall cry out in that day because of your king which ye shall have chosen you; and the LORD will not hear you in that day. Nevertheless the people refused to obey the voice of Samuel; and they said, Nay; but we will have a king over us; That we also may be like all the nations; and that our king may judge us, and go out before us, and fight our battles. 1 Samuel 8:18-20​

This was not a dismissal of a "nation!" How can you confuse "nation" with "kingdom?" And yet, God even tolerated a kingdom in Israel, which you seem to deny even existed? Ultimately, Jesus' kingship will be over all of God's chosen nations in the Millennium. But it will be a heavenly king. The nations will still be there in accordance with God's promises to Abraham.

I think it's shameful how you dismiss God's word in this way!
 
I could just as easily say that you're rebelling against God because that is exactly what He did during the Davidic Kingdom, and precisely what He promised Abraham--the nation Israel and many nations serving the God of Abraham.

How easily you dismiss history and the promises of God!

Yeah you can easily say that, but you would be wrong. God's will was for Israel to be a holy nation of priests ruled by God, not by men. But they rebelled, and God adapted to their rebellion in order bring about his purposes, which is a holy nation of God, ruled by God. There will be no going back to God's nation being ruled by men. David's kingdom was just a shadow of that nation that now exists, which will stand forever and crush every nation ruled by men.
 
I could just as easily say that you're rebelling against God because that is exactly what He did during the Davidic Kingdom, and precisely what He promised Abraham--the nation Israel and many nations serving the God of Abraham.

How easily you dismiss history and the promises of God!



This was not a dismissal of a "nation!" How can you confuse "nation" with "kingdom?" And yet, God even tolerated a kingdom in Israel, which you seem to deny even existed? Ultimately, Jesus' kingship will be over all of God's chosen nations in the Millennium. But it will be a heavenly king. The nations will still be there in accordance with God's promises to Abraham.

I think it's shameful how you dismiss God's word in this way!

Nation and kingdom are interchangeable words because though the word nation means people, it can also include the idea of rule and authority that are intrinsic to the word kingdom. So people use the terms willy nilly and confuse the issue.

I'm not confusing anything. The nation (people) of Israel wasn't called a kingdom until they rebelled against God. Before that time it was a nation ruled by God through his prophets and judges, but even that wasn't God's original will because he told the nation of Israel at Mt Sinai that if they obeyed his voice they would become a holy nation and a kingdom of priests, ie, a holy people ruled by God. But that didn't happen because of their rebellion.

Jesus brought that holy nation and kingdom of priests into being, ie, the kingdom of God. There will be no going back to a nation/kingdom of God ruled by men because the son of God himself sits on the throne and will shepherd/rule all nations with a rod of iron.
 
Yeah you can easily say that, but you would be wrong. God's will was for Israel to be a holy nation of priests ruled by God, not by men.

On the contrary, God created men to rule on earth, to subdue the earth under his feet. God anointed certain leaders in ancient Israel to rule them--not necessarily as kings, but often as prophets. God ruled as these "prophets" heard and delivered the word of God to Israel.

When God allowed kings to rule in Israel, He anointed them, and they became vessels for His own rule, once again--just as He had with the Prophets. The word of God confirms this!

You fight against God's word. God uses men. There can be no doubt about that. And he establishes leaders. There also can be no doubt about that. He even sets up rulers that are not part of His Kingdom. And He expects us to submit to them.

What you have against "men" I don't know. But you have to live in another world not to realize this. Nations are ruled by leaders, and God set them up knowing that people have a problem hearing directly from Him.
 
Nation and kingdom are interchangeable words because though the word nation means people, it can also include the idea of rule and authority that are intrinsic to the word kingdom. So people use the terms willy nilly and confuse the issue.

No, "nation" and "kingdom" are not perfectly interchangeable. They can be interchangeable at times for sure. But in the matter I was arguing nations do not have to be kingdoms. For example, Israel today is a nation, but not a "kingdom."

You seem to have a problem with God using human authority--even Christian leaders? No nation is perfect, and no leader is perfect. But God's Kingdom can exist in a temporal form on earth through nations or kingdoms that have inspired leaders when the people overall are in covenant with God.

Ancient Israel operated this way, and Christian nations have operated this way. They are a temporal form of God's Kingdom, as opposed to the eschatological Kingdom of God that is coming. Entire nations can live in covenant relationship with God and be led by God. Israel certainly was in the Wilderness, right?

I'm not confusing anything. The nation (people) of Israel wasn't called a kingdom until they rebelled against God.

Yes, but God ultimately accepted and sanitized the rebellion by appointing, eventually, the Davidic monarchs. God accepted the monarchial form of government out of necessity because the people demanded it, and God had promised to maintain the nation.
 
No, "nation" and "kingdom" are not perfectly interchangeable. They can be interchangeable at times for sure. But in the matter I was arguing nations do not have to be kingdoms. For example, Israel today is a nation, but not a "kingdom."

You seem to have a problem with God using human authority--even Christian leaders? No nation is perfect, and no leader is perfect. But God's Kingdom can exist in a temporal form on earth through nations or kingdoms that have inspired leaders when the people overall are in covenant with God.

Ancient Israel operated this way, and Christian nations have operated this way. They are a temporal form of God's Kingdom, as opposed to the eschatological Kingdom of God that is coming. Entire nations can live in covenant relationship with God and be led by God. Israel certainly was in the Wilderness, right?

Yes, but God ultimately accepted and sanitized the rebellion by appointing, eventually, the Davidic monarchs. God accepted the monarchial form of government out of necessity because the people demanded it, and God had promised to maintain the nation.

I'm going to hang up the phone now because i really don't feel like trying to prove anything to you. If you can't hear what I've already said then there's no point in me continuing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: randyk