Ya, i guess the first hurdle would be if you accept the Vines Greek definition of pisteuo.
You hinted you were ok with it. Are you?
Jay
As I said, I don't use Vine's. The question is are you OK with it since you referenced it?
Here's a copy from the online version I linked you to earlier. The copy and paste apparently doesn't like the fonts, so I'll transliterate in bold:
BELIEF, BELIEVE, BELIEVERS A. Verbs.
1. $ ( ", pisteuō 4100), “to believe,” also “to be persuaded of,” and hence, “to place confidence in, to trust,” signifies, in this sense of the word, reliance upon, not mere credence. It is most frequent in the writings of the apostle John, especially the Gospel. He does not use the noun (see below). For the Lord’s first use of the verb, see 1:50. Of the writers of the Gospels, Matthew uses the verb ten times, Mark ten, Luke nine, John ninety-nine. In Acts 5:14 the present participle of the verb is translated “believers. See COMMIT, INTRUST, TRUST.
2. (&, peithō 3982), “to persuade,” in the middle and passive voices signifies “to suffer oneself to be persuaded,” e.g., Luke 16:31; Heb. 13:18; it is sometimes translated “believe” in the RV, but not in Acts 17:4, RV, “were persuaded,” and 27:11, “gave (more) heed”; in Acts 28:24, “believed. See AGREE, ASSURE, OBEY, PERSUADE, TRUST, YIELD. Note: For apisteō, the negative of No. 1, and apeitheō, the negative of No. 2, see DISBELIEVE, DISOBEDIENT.
Since "surrender" doesn't show up there, here's Vine's re: Faith:
FAITH
(& , pistis 4102), primarily, “firm persuasion,” a conviction based upon hearing (akin to peithō, “to persuade”), is used in the NT always of “faith in God or Christ, or things spiritual.”
The word is used of (a) trust, e.g., Rom. 3:25 [see Note (4) below]; 1 Cor. 2:5; 15:14, 17; 2 Cor. 1:24; Gal. 3:23 [see Note (5) below]; Phil. 1:25; 2:17; 1 Thess. 3:2; 2 Thess. 1:3; 3:2; (b) trust-worthiness, e.g., Matt. 23:23; Rom. 3:3, RV, “the faithfulness of God”; Gal. 5:22 (RV, “faithfulness”); Titus 2:10, “fidelity”; (c) by metonymy, what is believed, the contents of belief, the “faith,” Acts 6:7; 14:22; Gal. 1:23; 3:25 [contrast 3:23, under (a)]; 6:10; Phil. 1:27; 1 Thess. 3:10; Jude 3, 20 (and perhaps 2 Thess. 3:2); (d) a ground for “faith,” an assurance, Acts 17:31 (not as in KJV, marg., “offered faith”); (e) a pledge of fidelity, plighted “faith,” 1 Tim. 5:12.
The main elements in “faith” in its relation to the invisible God, as distinct from “faith” in man, are especially brought out in the use of this noun and the corresponding verb, $ pisteuō; they are (1) a firm conviction, producing a full acknowledgement of God’s revelation or truth, e.g., 2 Thess. 2:11-12; (2) a personal surrender to Him, John 1:12; (3) a conduct inspired by such surrender, 2 Cor. 5:7. Prominence is given to one or other of these elements according to the context. All this stands in contrast to belief in its purely natural exercise, which consists of an opinion held in good “faith” without necessary reference to its proof. The object of Abraham’s “faith” was not God’s promise (that was the occasion of its exercise); his “faith” rested on God Himself, Rom. 4:17, 20-21. See ASSURANCE, BELIEF, FAITHFULNESS, FIDELITY.
Notes: (1) In Heb. 10:23, elpis , “hope,” is mistranslated “faith” in the KJV (RV, “hope”). (2) In Acts 6:8 the most authentic mss. have charis , “grace,” RV, for pistis, “faith.” (3) In Rom. 3:3, RV, apistia, is rendered “want of faith,” for KJV, “unbelief” (so translated elsewhere). See UNBELIEF. The verb apisteō in that verse is rendered “were without faith,” RV, for KJV, “did not believe.” (4) In Rom. 3:25, the KJV wrongly links “faith” with “in His blood,” as if “faith” is reposed in the blood (i.e., the death) of Christ; the en is instrumental; “faith” rests in the living Person; hence the RV rightly puts a comma after “through faith,” and renders the next phrase “by His blood,” which is to be connected with “a propitiation.” Christ became a propitiation through His blood (i.e., His death in expiatory sacrifice for sin). (5) In Gal. 3:23, though the article stands before “faith” in the original, “faith” is here to be taken as under (a) above, and as in v. 22, and not as under (c), “the faith”; the article is simply that of renewed mention. (6) For the difference between the teaching of Paul and that of James, on “faith” and works, see : 5 Notes on Galatians by Hogg and Vine, pp. 117-119.
So, Vine says John1:12 speaks of a personal surrender & 2Cor5:7 speaks of a conduct inspired by such surrender.
- How so - how do these verses speak of "surrender"?
- One of the issues with theological dictionaries - and many lexicons - is that they tend to insert theological conclusions into definitions rather than just defining words.
- Are we mainly concerned with the verb or the noun or both, since Vine says the surrender is related to both?
In answer to your question, there's too much here to simply accept. Do I simply accept "surrender" is stated in the 2 verses Vine references? No. Can you explain why we should accept what Vine says?
You also referenced Strong's Expanded. I don't have a copy and don't see it on open domain online. If you' like to quote what it says on topic, I'm happy to read it.