Europe sends troops to Greenland.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
TruthDefender said:
No, it means mixing up God’s word with lies and calling it His word. I don’t believe in religion, I believe in Truth. They’re trying to hybridize the two into one. This sounds satanical….. Nothing more to discuss! 😇
Click to expand...
That is not ecumenism. Dialogue is not about mixing and compromising.
 

How We Ended Up Raising the Stupidest Generation

Information overload and the habit of having computers doing our thinking for us.

To make things worse the internet is designed to put you into an echo chamber. The algorithms look for content that matches previous content that you liked. In this way you are given the illusion that everyone agrees with your pre conceived notions. This leads to confirmation bias.

It is crucial that our assumptions be questioned.

For example, in this thread people were talking as if The US and Europe were going to go to war over Greenland, with armies. Prime example of how stupid dialogue has become.

You know you are in "group think" when you have to ridicule and insult those who question your assumptions. We see this with what we call "Karens", people who seem to have no sense of humor at all. Instead of seeing the absurdity of what they are saying they are offended and insulted.

For example, if I question something that Trump does do you see that as "betrayal" or as an honest attempt to know the truth and think critically?

Youtube favors titles that scream emergency, urgency, and crisis. But ask yourself a simple question, is the US really going to war with Europe over a place that has a population of Hempstead, NY?

Look at the title of this thread "Europe sends troops". Since when does "troops" equal two soldiers?

Trump said he wanted Greenland and would do whatever it takes to get it. So then, a reasonable question is why? I asked what is the strategic value of Greenland? It turns out that strategically it is quite significant, especially in a time of war, and the comments coming out of the Whitehouse reenforced this talking about the last time the US took control of Greenland during WW2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TruthDefender
Skittle said:
No, the Catholic Church does not have the same opinion as you. Most other mainstream Christian groups do not share you opinion. There is nothing wrong with having greater understanding instead of shunning people because you think they are evil. There are only a handful of bigoted small groups that promote the idea that certain people are evil and cannot be spoken with.
Now I believe that Islam is evil and disgusting. That does not mean I refuse to enter a mosque or simple dialogue with a person who believes differently than I do.



It is not "fellowship." I think you are missing the point. It is about being able to discuss faith without being a jerk.
Click to expand...
Speaking the truth in love is not being a jerk, especially when you are risking your life to do it. I would not enter a mosque. I've seen how Muslims react to truth.

Believers have nothing in common with Muslims apart from the fact that we are human. The false aspect of this so called dialogue is that it puts Islam in a light that it does have something in common with Christianity. How often have you heard the term "Abrahamic religion" or that it is monotheistic. Sure it is monotheistic. Satan is the god of Islam. By calling it "Abrahamic", the implication is that it worships the God of Abraham but not quite the same as Christians do. Baloney.

Religious Jews do worship the God of Abraham but in ignorance that their promised Messiah is already come. At least you can talk to a Jew without losing your head. Literally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TruthDefender
ZNP said:

How We Ended Up Raising the Stupidest Generation

Information overload and the habit of having computers doing our thinking for us.

To make things worse the internet is designed to put you into an echo chamber. The algorithms look for content that matches previous content that you liked. In this way you are given the illusion that everyone agrees with your pre conceived notions. This leads to confirmation bias.

It is crucial that our assumptions be questioned.

For example, in this thread people were talking as if The US and Europe were going to go to war over Greenland, with armies. Prime example of how stupid dialogue has become.

You know you are in "group think" when you have to ridicule and insult those who question your assumptions. We see this with what we call "Karens", people who seem to have no sense of humor at all. Instead of seeing the absurdity of what they are saying they are offended and insulted.

For example, if I question something that Trump does do you see that as "betrayal" or as an honest attempt to know the truth and think critically?

Youtube favors titles that scream emergency, urgency, and crisis. But ask yourself a simple question, is the US really going to war with Europe over a place that has a population of Hempstead, NY?

Look at the title of this thread "Europe sends troops". Since when does "troops" equal two soldiers?

Trump said he wanted Greenland and would do whatever it takes to get it. So then, a reasonable question is why? I asked what is the strategic value of Greenland? It turns out that strategically it is quite significant, especially in a time of war, and the comments coming out of the Whitehouse reenforced this talking about the last time the US took control of Greenland during WW2.
Click to expand...
To quote those great philosophers, the Rolling Stones, "You can't always get what you want." Whether or not Mr Trump has good reasons is not the point. You do not threaten allies with military action to get your own way. Not if you want to retain them as allies.
 
ZNP said:
Oh yeah how stupid of me, Greenland gets to decide. Throughout human history it has always been that way that the land with 50,000 people gets to decide, not the country with 350,000,000. My bad, I should have studied human history in school.
Click to expand...

How about a nation of 1.1 billion taking over America? Is that justified? You'd better learn Mandarin.
 
ZNP said:

How We Ended Up Raising the Stupidest Generation

Information overload and the habit of having computers doing our thinking for us.

To make things worse the internet is designed to put you into an echo chamber. The algorithms look for content that matches previous content that you liked. In this way you are given the illusion that everyone agrees with your pre conceived notions. This leads to confirmation bias.

It is crucial that our assumptions be questioned.

For example, in this thread people were talking as if The US and Europe were going to go to war over Greenland, with armies. Prime example of how stupid dialogue has become.

You know you are in "group think" when you have to ridicule and insult those who question your assumptions. We see this with what we call "Karens", people who seem to have no sense of humor at all. Instead of seeing the absurdity of what they are saying they are offended and insulted.

For example, if I question something that Trump does do you see that as "betrayal" or as an honest attempt to know the truth and think critically?

Youtube favors titles that scream emergency, urgency, and crisis. But ask yourself a simple question, is the US really going to war with Europe over a place that has a population of Hempstead, NY?

Look at the title of this thread "Europe sends troops". Since when does "troops" equal two soldiers?

Trump said he wanted Greenland and would do whatever it takes to get it. So then, a reasonable question is why? I asked what is the strategic value of Greenland? It turns out that strategically it is quite significant, especially in a time of war, and the comments coming out of the Whitehouse reenforced this talking about the last time the US took control of Greenland during WW2.
Click to expand...

The two soldier's news stories is probably what blows their minds. It's because they don't realize NATO sends troops in and out of Greenland all the time and holds exercises and operations in and around Greenland one after another. Joint Viking, Arctic Sentry and several others and now it's Operation Arctic Endurance. The troop numbers go up and down and planes land with 2 one day and 50 the next while ships come and then leave. The news never shows when the exercises are over and when groups of troops leave and so nobody realizes that at any given time there could be as many as several thousand troops at Greenland or as few as 500. Trump just got briefed on it over the last year and he thinks it's something new is all. If anyone knew to look they would find that even the US was invited to take part in the current Operation Arctic Endurance but then we wouldn't be able to pretend NATO is going to war with the US.
 
Skittle said:
That is not ecumenism. Dialogue is not about mixing and compromising.
Click to expand...

I’m not trying to be ecumenical. It seems you’re missing my point. All I’m stating is the combining of 2 religions is called hybridizing. In this case, it’s satanical! God’s word is complete.

Revelation 22 tells us what will happen, if you add/take away from Scripture. Take it to heart!
 
ZNP said:

How We Ended Up Raising the Stupidest Generation

Information overload and the habit of having computers doing our thinking for us.

To make things worse the internet is designed to put you into an echo chamber. The algorithms look for content that matches previous content that you liked. In this way you are given the illusion that everyone agrees with your pre conceived notions. This leads to confirmation bias.

It is crucial that our assumptions be questioned.

For example, in this thread people were talking as if The US and Europe were going to go to war over Greenland, with armies. Prime example of how stupid dialogue has become.

You know you are in "group think" when you have to ridicule and insult those who question your assumptions. We see this with what we call "Karens", people who seem to have no sense of humor at all. Instead of seeing the absurdity of what they are saying they are offended and insulted.

For example, if I question something that Trump does do you see that as "betrayal" or as an honest attempt to know the truth and think critically?

Youtube favors titles that scream emergency, urgency, and crisis. But ask yourself a simple question, is the US really going to war with Europe over a place that has a population of Hempstead, NY?

Look at the title of this thread "Europe sends troops". Since when does "troops" equal two soldiers?

Trump said he wanted Greenland and would do whatever it takes to get it. So then, a reasonable question is why? I asked what is the strategic value of Greenland? It turns out that strategically it is quite significant, especially in a time of war, and the comments coming out of the Whitehouse reenforced this talking about the last time the US took control of Greenland during WW2.
Click to expand...

People listen to Fake News too much! Those who have TDS will believe all the negative hype on Pres. Trump, even if there is zero truth to the twisted statements.
 
Gideon300 said:
Speaking the truth in love is not being a jerk, especially when you are risking your life to do it. I would not enter a mosque. I've seen how Muslims react to truth.

Believers have nothing in common with Muslims apart from the fact that we are human. The false aspect of this so called dialogue is that it puts Islam in a light that it does have something in common with Christianity. How often have you heard the term "Abrahamic religion" or that it is monotheistic. Sure it is monotheistic. Satan is the god of Islam. By calling it "Abrahamic", the implication is that it worships the God of Abraham but not quite the same as Christians do. Baloney.

Religious Jews do worship the God of Abraham but in ignorance that their promised Messiah is already come. At least you can talk to a Jew without losing your head. Literally.
Click to expand...

There are sections of biblical verses in the koran, but its twisted/ wrested bits, here and there; these “Bits” don’t really match up. The reading of it is not smooth but rigid, nothing like God’s word. Any Bible student can tell that it’s not from God!
 
Here's a working compass that points to true North for some of you who have a broken compass when you compare the Bible with politics.

1769465921210.png

Take care.
 
Gideon300 said:
Speaking the truth in love is not being a jerk, especially when you are risking your life to do it. I would not enter a mosque. I've seen how Muslims react to truth.
.
Click to expand...

I agree and I want nothing to do with Muhammadians. I am pointing out that some people want to dialogue with them.
I disagree with that. He was a pedophile. It only legitimizes their bastard religion.
 
TruthDefender said:
I’m not trying to be ecumenical. It seems you’re missing my point. All I’m stating is the combining of 2 religions is called hybridizing. In this case, it’s satanical! God’s word is complete.

Revelation 22 tells us what will happen, if you add/take away from Scripture. Take it to heart!
Click to expand...

I agree and they are not trying to combine religions but have "dialogue" which is pointless and stupid. It does not mean they want to combine anything.
 
Skittle said:
I agree and they are not trying to combine religions but have "dialogue" which is pointless and stupid. It does not mean they want to combine anything.
Click to expand...

My statements refer back to what someone said in #2. That person stated it (hybridization of the 2 religions) has already begun.

You missed his statement.
 
TruthDefender said:
My statements refer back to what someone said in #2. That person stated it (hybridization of the 2 religions) has already begun.

You missed his statement.
Click to expand...

When and where? No serious Christian group or Muhammadianism is trying to combine anything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back