Examining the finances of TPUSA
- Thread starter ZNP
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Sure. Better to have truth with a little language than polite lies.
Typical...if you can't find fault with the message...kill the messenger.
This was from the video that I linked in Post #75, the entire show will give you all the links you need.
Seriously, you still haven't watched it. The video clearly states he is referring to this by Dan Bongino
So yes, Dan Bongino is included with all the paid influencers.
You obviously don't agree with his opinion. He and Charlie were friends and he doesn't believe Erica was involved in his death.
I don't know if Erica was involved, that is something for a thorough investigation. I have no issue with anyone who wants to defend Erica, the best way to defend her is to do a thorough investigation so that we can shine the light on the truth.
No, my issue is with him calling those who are doing this investigation evil and a demon.
The assassination was evil, investigating who did it, that is not evil.
Jesus Christ was examined, that examination proved He was a spotless lamb.
What is particularly galling to me is as an FBI agent he knows that close family and friends will always be investigated in an assassination. He knows that the multi million dollar life insurance policy is one possible motive. He knows that taking over TPUSA is another possible motive.
Whenever a Caesar was assassinated the praetorian Guard was always involved. Therefore Charlie Kirk's personal security should be heavily scrutinized. Whoever arranged this event should be heavily scrutinized.
For someone in the FBI who knows this is homicide investigation 101 to be making a fuss about Candace Owens doing this is pure hypocrisy.
He asserted she should burn in hell.
It was not a little language, you just agree so you are dismissive.
He just just does not like the fact she revealed him to be involved a cover up and he is on the defensive.
I don't want anyone to burn in hell, so you would be wise not to ascribe to me things that aren't true. This is especially true as someone is currently doing the same to you on another thread.
I do not believe Dan would cover up a crime intentionally. I believe his emotions are overriding his intelligence in this matter.
I never ascribed it to you......but those were his words.
Whether intentional or not I do not know, but his lashing out at CO speaks volumes.
She is revealing corruption at great personal risk, I applaud her.
The End
And Candace Owens is dealing with the crime as a friend. There is no excuse for Dan Bongino's response. He is not ignorant of how to investigate an assassination.
You just agree so you are dismissive are your words. I don't agree with sending anyone to hell. Neither do I know the truth concerning Charlie Kirk's death and have no preinclination on the matter. I'll wait for the truth, if it ever comes out. But you did ascribe to me things I do not believe. And you wonder when others do the same to you.
This video makes a claim that in his last email Charlie said he was planning on divorcing Erika because of "doubts" about the paternity of his two kids.
1st, no one would ever say they were thinking about divorcing their wife of many years because they "doubted" the paternity of their two children. First, they would do a DNA test of each kid and then know for sure what the paternity was. Only then would they email someone and say the reason was because the two children were not theirs. If Charlie actually said he was thinking of divorcing her because of the paternity of his two kids then he already knew the results of the DNA test.
I have no way to verify this claim, but it is absolutely crucial that any investigation into the assassination examine all of these allegations. At the very least they should do a paternity test of the two children and compare that to Charlie's DNA.
The issue is not simply that the kids were not his. No, the issue is he was planning to divorce her for infidelity, that is clearly a motive for murder. If the prosecution of this case does not examine this allegation and either debunk it or else prove it is true, then the prosecution is not justice, it is a coverup.
1st, no one would ever say they were thinking about divorcing their wife of many years because they "doubted" the paternity of their two children. First, they would do a DNA test of each kid and then know for sure what the paternity was. Only then would they email someone and say the reason was because the two children were not theirs. If Charlie actually said he was thinking of divorcing her because of the paternity of his two kids then he already knew the results of the DNA test.
I have no way to verify this claim, but it is absolutely crucial that any investigation into the assassination examine all of these allegations. At the very least they should do a paternity test of the two children and compare that to Charlie's DNA.
The issue is not simply that the kids were not his. No, the issue is he was planning to divorce her for infidelity, that is clearly a motive for murder. If the prosecution of this case does not examine this allegation and either debunk it or else prove it is true, then the prosecution is not justice, it is a coverup.