You continue to say this but you have no evidence. You lack integrity.Whoever sharing the words of God but can't identify who God the Father is.
You continue to say this but you have no evidence. You lack integrity.Whoever sharing the words of God but can't identify who God the Father is.
Jesus is the King of Kings
REVELATION 19:16
16 And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, King Of Kings, And Lord Of Lords.
The truth is: Jesus never be the King of the political Kings.
Jesus is the King of the chosen of God (who are spiritual Kings).
Therfore the appinted Kings in the old testament are spiritual Kings and not political Kings.
It is still a separation of churches and state.
If you pay attention to his posts, you’ll realize this is exactly what he does.Or do you just apply your own spin on the term and not worry about what it likely was intended to mean.
Let us learn the lesson from the New Testament.You continue to say this but you have no evidence. You lack integrity.
A question, do you know the origin of the phrase "king of kings" and do you know what it meant to hearers in the 1st century? Or do you just apply your own spin on the term and not worry about what it likely was intended to mean.
People are given a freewill to decide for themselves to believe the truth or not.If you pay attention to his posts, you’ll realize this is exactly what he does
Again you post thinly-veiled accusations but fail to provide any evidence to support them.Let us learn the lesson from the New Testament.
When Scribes & Pharisees (religous leaders with integrity), who are preaching the words of God to the Jews and claiming their God is the Father.
JOHN 8:41
41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.
But since they can't identify who God the Father is.
JOHN 54:55
54 Jesus answered, If I honour myself, my honour is nothing: it is my Father that honoureth me; of whom ye say, that he is your God:
55 Yet ye have not known him; but I know him: and if I should say, I know him not, I shall be a liar like unto you: but I know him, and keep his saying.
Whoever, the recognition to Jesus is not a revelation from the Father (Matthew 16:15-17) they don't deserve an evidence.
This is what Jesus tell them when they ask for evidence and after that Jesus will leave them.
LUKE 11:29
29 And when the people were gathered thick together, he began to say, This is an evil generation: they seek a sign; and there shall no sign be given it, but the sign of Jonas the prophet.
MATTHEW 16:4
4 A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas. And he left them, and departed.
If Simon Peter, John & James will come in our generation as a regular fishermen only.
Would you believe on what they share or you will ask them the same question?
How about Lazarus full of sores in Luke 16:19-31.
If he comes in our generation and share what is the truth.
Would you believe in him or you will also ask the same question?
LUKE 16:20-21
20 And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, which was laid at his gate, full of sores,
21 And desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man's table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores.
You are foolish to equate your words with those of Jesus.People are given a freewill to decide for themselves to believe the truth or not.
As the Lord Jesus said to his chosen:
MATTHEW 10:14
14 And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
MATTHEW 15:14
14 Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.
Hello to u and than you for your posts , I enjoy them very much . Stay strong in Christ and don't b down hearted when others don't appreciate u .Let us learn the lesson from the New Testament.
When Scribes & Pharisees (religous leaders with integrity), who are preaching the words of God to the Jews and claiming their God is the Father.
JOHN 8:41
41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.
But since they can't identify who God the Father is.
JOHN 54:55
54 Jesus answered, If I honour myself, my honour is nothing: it is my Father that honoureth me; of whom ye say, that he is your God:
55 Yet ye have not known him; but I know him: and if I should say, I know him not, I shall be a liar like unto you: but I know him, and keep his saying.
Whoever, the recognition to Jesus is not a revelation from the Father (Matthew 16:15-17) they don't deserve an evidence.
This is what Jesus tell them when they ask for evidence and after that Jesus will leave them.
LUKE 11:29
29 And when the people were gathered thick together, he began to say, This is an evil generation: they seek a sign; and there shall no sign be given it, but the sign of Jonas the prophet.
MATTHEW 16:4
4 A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas. And he left them, and departed.
You are foolish to equate your words with those of Jesus
If you cannot answer a simple question, you can just say so, you do not need to try to deflect the away from yourself. A simple admission that you do not know the answer indicates an honest person, deflecting makes me, at least even if no one else, wonder why you feel the need to deflect.
You have no integrity.The truth is: Whoever can't identify who God the Father is. He is the real foolish in the eyes of God and there is no truth in him.
Jesus is the King of Kings
REVELATION 19:16
16 And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, King Of Kings, And Lord Of Lords.
The truth is: Jesus never be the King of the political Kings.
Jesus is the King of the chosen of God (who are spiritual Kings).
Therfore the appinted Kings in the old testament are spiritual Kings and not political Kings.
It is still a separation of churches and state.
Let me remind you that we are talking about spiritual things in this thread.You have no integrity.
Spiritual integrity is the kind most lacking in you. You have slandered me repeatedly and you continue doing so obliquely. You have not provided any evidence to support your slander.Let me remind you that we are talking about spiritual things in this thread.
For a clarification only. And for the information of the readers too.
When it comes to spiritual what kind of integrity are you looking for?
A question, do you know the origin of the phrase "king of kings" and do you know what it meant to hearers in the 1st century? Or do you just apply your own spin on the term and not worry about what it likely was intended to mean.
It is not necessary to know the origin of the phrase King of Kings.
It is a word of God and God will be the one to reveal the meaning of it.
And God could reveal the meaning if we humble ourselves to him.
Spiritual integrity is the kind most lacking in you. You have slandered me repeatedly and you continue doing so obliquely. You have not provided any evidence to support your slander.
Genuine integrity would have you justify your accusations by quoting me where I have said things you claim I believe or reject, or offer a contrite apology when you realize there is no such evidence and you have invented a narrative with no objective foundation…
For the information of other readers.
However, because you don’t actually have integrity, you will dodge accountability, claim your comments are not personal, or make up some ridiculous moralizing hogwash about some righteous warrant for your despicable behaviour. Then you will continue in your slander, while still claiming it is “truth”…
For the information of other readers.