What a insincere answer to such a simple question.How sincere could these people have been if they end up rejecting Him later?
What a insincere answer to such a simple question.How sincere could these people have been if they end up rejecting Him later?
You'll have to show WHO 1 Peter 1:4 is speaking about.
I have no idea.
I just know that those saved AT THE END OF THEIR LIFE will receive their salvation.
Posting a verse that says that we will receive an inheritance...doesn't say much.
WHO will receive the inheritance?
Maybe, but I would rather stay focused on the text rather than get bogged down with that.You don't post any...
so I won't reply.
Just to say that if you think I take verses OUT OF CONTEXT...
don't you think it would be a GOOD IDEA to correct me?
That is correct, and I'm not bragging. I have a personal habit of checking my assumptions to examine them objectively. This type of mindset is essential in Biblical exegesis.YOU....OTOH,,,,have a very open mind, I'm sure.
You said, "THE MAN WHO WILLS just means that we will not be saved by our works but by our faith in God. The part in bold text is what you added. Paul is neither talking about works nor faith in chapter 9. He is helping his readers understand the concept of "the children of promise." He speaks about God, his promises, and his will.PLEASE show me where.
Why put me in a box?Why don't you CLIMB OUT OF THE BOX?
You claim not to be interested in philosophy, and yet you make a non-sequitur reference to Pelagius.Pelagius had another option.
But I truly doubt you mean that one.
Listen. The verse I cited is an explicit statement of fact You can not deny the facts and remain a credible person.No Roger.
That is NOT what Paul says.
I already proved it.It's up to YOU to prove Paul taught that God chooses who will be saved.
Who are those people? This sounds hypothetical, assuming such people exist.Okay but what about the OP.
So where do people such as those who once sincerely confessed Jesus as Lord but later rejected Him fit into this understanding?
I was being very sincere. It just wasn't the answer that you wanted to hear.What a insincere answer to such a simple question.
Right. New Slogan: Salvation by Sanctification Alone!Positional sanctification isn't a Reformed invention. It's simply the NT’s past tense sanctification category. Paul uses both the aorist (1 Cor 6:11) & the perfect tense (1 Cor 1:2) to describe a completed identity with ongoing results. That's grammar, not denominational bias.
1 Corinthians doesn't deny positional sanctification; it assumes it. Paul's entire argument is: You are sanctified, now live consistently with that identity.
You're collapsing identity & obedience into one category, but Paul keeps them distinct. The perfect tense in 1 Cor 1:2 explicitly affirms a continuing state, not a temporary one. You're reading your system into the text instead of letting the text define the categories.
SANCTIFICATION - Strong's Greek: 38. ἁγιασμός (hagiasmos) -- Sanctification, holiness, consecration
Lexical Summary hagiasmos: Sanctification, holiness, consecration
HELPS Word-studies Cognate: 38 hagiasmós (a masculine noun derived from 40 /hágios, "holy") – sanctification (the process of advancing in holiness); use of the believer being progressively transformed by the Lord into His likeness (similarity of nature). See 40 /hagios ("holy").
Topical Lexicon Meaning and Concept
Strong’s Greek 38 (ἁγιασμός) speaks of sanctification—a state of consecration brought about by God that issues in practical holiness of life. It embraces both the decisive setting-apart that occurs at conversion and the ongoing transformation that conforms believers to the image of Christ.
CHRIST EMBODIES & SECURES EVERY STAGE OF SALVATION
Sanctification and Salvation’s Order Romans 6:19 and Romans 6:22 link sanctification to freedom from sin’s dominion.
Justification declares the believer righteous; sanctification makes that righteousness visible in conduct, anticipating glorification. 1 Corinthians 1:30 sets sanctification alongside righteousness and redemption, showing that Christ Himself embodies and secures every stage of salvation.
Summary: Strong’s 38 anchors the New Testament vision of a people set apart by God, progressively transformed by the Spirit, and destined for flawless holiness at Christ’s appearing. Sanctification is God’s will, Christ’s achievement, the Spirit’s work, the believer’s pursuit, the church’s mission, and the believer’s destiny.
Are you such a bitter nasty person that you cannot stomach the exchange of pleasantries?There goes the discussion...
Maybe we just sit back and watch how @Roger316 interacts with strict & aggressive
deterministic monergism & some compatibilism and see what his 3rd option amounts to.
Feeling sincere, and repenting from unbelief to believing to be regenerated, these are very different things. Feelings of sincerity mean nothing, as you've pointed out, if they regard misplaced faith.You are simply avoiding a fair question.
Very sincere people have had a change of heart.
Have you ever sincerely believed something and now reject it?
Was Saul/Paul not a sincere Pharisee among Pharisees.
Thanks, but not interested in being led around bit by bit. Lay out your understanding of your 3rd way and support it with Scripture, or don't. I've already read a few brief summaries of Crabtree and have seen a few retorts against him.I assume you believe that God created all things. Or do you? John 1:3
Let me ask another question. Do you believe that God suspends the principle of cause and effect when he performs a miracle? Or Perhaps, In Scripture, miracles are God acting as the First Cause in a way that surpasses ordinary secondary causes, not a moment where causality disappears.
If you have no idea wouldn't it be better to wait until you know?You'll have to show WHO 1 Peter 1:4 is speaking about.
I have no idea.
I just know that those saved AT THE END OF THEIR LIFE will receive their salvation.
Posting a verse that says that we will receive an inheritance...doesn't say much.
WHO will receive the inheritance?
I'm just telling you what I see in verses.
Does Jesus telling us He won't force a man to leave mean he can't leave? The answer seems self-evident.
That's not grammar and is theological bias.Positional sanctification isn't a Reformed invention. It's simply the NT’s past tense sanctification category. Paul uses both the aorist (1 Cor 6:11) & the perfect tense (1 Cor 1:2) to describe a completed identity with ongoing results. That's grammar, not denominational bias.
The Third Way, as we are calling it, relies on an understanding of the nature of God and reality. It is only natural for me to ascertain your understanding of the relationship between God and his creation. But I see you have rejected the idea out of hand.Thanks, but not interested in being led around bit by bit. Lay out your understanding of your 3rd way and support it with Scripture, or don't. I've already read a few brief summaries of Crabtree and have seen a few retorts against him.
I tried Magenta.Are you such a bitter nasty person that you cannot stomach the exchange of pleasantries?
I'm rejecting the approach. Just spell it out.The Third Way, as we are calling it, relies on an understanding of the nature of God and reality. It is only natural for me to ascertain your understanding of the relationship between God and his creation. But I see you have rejected the idea out of hand.
You know what the aorist says, but you don't seem to know what it MEANS in this context. Paul has placed all the verbs in the aorist tense in order to group them all together in a tight grouping, which are to be considered as one act of the Holy Spirit.That's not grammar and is theological bias.
The aorist in this case speaks of a completed action in the past and provides no guaranty of future condition.
The perfect in itself speaks of an action in the past with continuing results up to the point of the author's writing with no guaranty of future condition.
Positional Sanctification is a theological construct used to name a theological interpretation.
Do you understand what we mean by God is transcendent?I'm rejecting the approach. Just spell it out.
What most folks fail to comprehend is that salvation is not a one time deal, it has three parts - Justification, Sanctification, Glorification. Accepting Lord Jesus as Lord and Savior is Justification, afterward it's Sanctification by growing in spirit, and the end, the resurrection in new, incorruptible body and eternal union with the Lord is Glorification. In the parable of the sower, the stony ground is the unsaved without Justification; the shallow ground and thorny ground, however, are the ones with Justification but without Sanctification, the seed of the gospel is accepted, but failing to bear fruit; only the last group truly completes all three parts of salvation, and even for them, their yield varies - "some a hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty". So this is not a simple black and white dichotomy. As long as you think of salvation as a simple black and white dichotomy, you'll be confused by seemingly contradicting gospel verses, and you'll never get it.
“Behold, a sower went out to sow. And as he sowed, some seed fell by the wayside; and the birds came and devoured them. Some fell on stony places, where they did not have much earth; and they immediately sprang up because they had no depth of earth. But when the sun was up they were scorched, and because they had no root they withered away. And some fell among thorns, and the thorns sprang up and choked them. But others fell on good ground and yielded a crop: some a hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty. He who has ears to hear, let him hear!” (Matt. 13:3-9)
Therefore hear the parable of the sower: When anyone hears the word of the kingdom, and does not understand it, then the wicked one comes and snatches away what was sown in his heart. This is he who received seed by the wayside. But he who received the seed on stony places, this is he who hears the word and immediately receives it with joy; yet he has no root in himself, but endures only for a while. For when tribulation or persecution arises because of the word, immediately he stumbles. Now he who received seed among the thorns is he who hears the word, and the cares of this world and the deceitfulness of riches choke the word, and he becomes unfruitful. But he who received seed on the good ground is he who hears the word and understands it, who indeed bears fruit and produces: some a hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty. (Matt. 13:18-23)
You "answered" the question with a question, this is not sincere.I was being very sincere.
It wasn't even an answer.It just wasn't the answer that you wanted to hear.