Loss of salvation???

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
You'll have to show WHO 1 Peter 1:4 is speaking about.

I have no idea.

I just know that those saved AT THE END OF THEIR LIFE will receive their salvation.

Posting a verse that says that we will receive an inheritance...doesn't say much.
WHO will receive the inheritance?


[1Pe 1:1-5 KJV]
1 Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,
2 Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied.
3 Blessed [be] the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,
4 To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you,
5 Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
 
You don't post any...
so I won't reply.

Just to say that if you think I take verses OUT OF CONTEXT...
don't you think it would be a GOOD IDEA to correct me?
Maybe, but I would rather stay focused on the text rather than get bogged down with that.
YOU....OTOH,,,,have a very open mind, I'm sure.
That is correct, and I'm not bragging. I have a personal habit of checking my assumptions to examine them objectively. This type of mindset is essential in Biblical exegesis.
PLEASE show me where.
You said, "THE MAN WHO WILLS just means that we will not be saved by our works but by our faith in God. The part in bold text is what you added. Paul is neither talking about works nor faith in chapter 9. He is helping his readers understand the concept of "the children of promise." He speaks about God, his promises, and his will.
Why don't you CLIMB OUT OF THE BOX?
Why put me in a box?
Pelagius had another option.
But I truly doubt you mean that one.
You claim not to be interested in philosophy, and yet you make a non-sequitur reference to Pelagius.
 
  • Like
Reactions: markss
Okay but what about the OP.

So where do people such as those who once sincerely confessed Jesus as Lord but later rejected Him fit into this understanding?
Who are those people? This sounds hypothetical, assuming such people exist.

God knows men's hearts, and He sees true faith, rewarding it with rebirth, from which none return to an unregenerate state.

The Bible speaks distinctly of those who are true and who do not fall away, and those who are not true, and do fall away.

Much love!
 
Positional sanctification isn't a Reformed invention. It's simply the NT’s past tense sanctification category. Paul uses both the aorist (1 Cor 6:11) & the perfect tense (1 Cor 1:2) to describe a completed identity with ongoing results. That's grammar, not denominational bias.

1 Corinthians doesn't deny positional sanctification; it assumes it. Paul's entire argument is: You are sanctified, now live consistently with that identity.

You're collapsing identity & obedience into one category, but Paul keeps them distinct. The perfect tense in 1 Cor 1:2 explicitly affirms a continuing state, not a temporary one. You're reading your system into the text instead of letting the text define the categories.

SANCTIFICATION - Strong's Greek: 38. ἁγιασμός (hagiasmos) -- Sanctification, holiness, consecration
Lexical Summary hagiasmos: Sanctification, holiness, consecration

HELPS Word-studies Cognate: 38 hagiasmós (a masculine noun derived from 40 /hágios, "holy") – sanctification (the process of advancing in holiness); use of the believer being progressively transformed by the Lord into His likeness (similarity of nature). See 40 /hagios ("holy").

Topical Lexicon Meaning and Concept
Strong’s Greek 38 (ἁγιασμός) speaks of sanctification—a state of consecration brought about by God that issues in practical holiness of life. It embraces both the decisive setting-apart that occurs at conversion and the ongoing transformation that conforms believers to the image of Christ.


CHRIST EMBODIES & SECURES EVERY STAGE OF SALVATION
Sanctification and Salvation’s Order Romans 6:19 and Romans 6:22 link sanctification to freedom from sin’s dominion.
Justification declares the believer righteous; sanctification makes that righteousness visible in conduct, anticipating glorification. 1 Corinthians 1:30 sets sanctification alongside righteousness and redemption, showing that Christ Himself embodies and secures every stage of salvation.

Summary: Strong’s 38 anchors the New Testament vision of a people set apart by God, progressively transformed by the Spirit, and destined for flawless holiness at Christ’s appearing. Sanctification is God’s will, Christ’s achievement, the Spirit’s work, the believer’s pursuit, the church’s mission, and the believer’s destiny.
Right. New Slogan: Salvation by Sanctification Alone! :) Yes?
 
You are simply avoiding a fair question.

Very sincere people have had a change of heart.

Have you ever sincerely believed something and now reject it?

Was Saul/Paul not a sincere Pharisee among Pharisees.
Feeling sincere, and repenting from unbelief to believing to be regenerated, these are very different things. Feelings of sincerity mean nothing, as you've pointed out, if they regard misplaced faith.

You can say that someone has had a change of heart, do you mean they have been regenerated (born from God) or that they now think and feel a different way? Again, these are very different things.

The real question, to my thinking, is, "Have you believed/received Jesus to then be born again from our Heavenly Father?" Is He your Heavenly Father? That infinitely transcends being sincere over something, or having a "change of heart".

In the parable of the Sower Jesus shows those who had "received the word with joy", but then "it had no root" in them, so they've had a "sincere" emotional experience, but that was all.

Much love!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mailmandan
I assume you believe that God created all things. Or do you? John 1:3

Let me ask another question. Do you believe that God suspends the principle of cause and effect when he performs a miracle? Or Perhaps, In Scripture, miracles are God acting as the First Cause in a way that surpasses ordinary secondary causes, not a moment where causality disappears.
Thanks, but not interested in being led around bit by bit. Lay out your understanding of your 3rd way and support it with Scripture, or don't. I've already read a few brief summaries of Crabtree and have seen a few retorts against him.
 
You'll have to show WHO 1 Peter 1:4 is speaking about.

I have no idea.

I just know that those saved AT THE END OF THEIR LIFE will receive their salvation.

Posting a verse that says that we will receive an inheritance...doesn't say much.
WHO will receive the inheritance?
If you have no idea wouldn't it be better to wait until you know?

1 Peter 1:3-5 KJV
3) Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,
4) To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you,
5) Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.

He speaks of those who have been born again, past tense. To those, He has reserved an inheritance, teaching that they are in fact kept - guarded - by the power of God through faith unto salvation.

Does anyone think they are stronger than God, that any should subvert His protection of His children?

Who will receive this inheritance? Those who have been born again. If you have been born again, you will receive this inheritance, being guarded for it by God's power. Loss of salvation? Not if you are born again.

Much love!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mailmandan
Positional sanctification isn't a Reformed invention. It's simply the NT’s past tense sanctification category. Paul uses both the aorist (1 Cor 6:11) & the perfect tense (1 Cor 1:2) to describe a completed identity with ongoing results. That's grammar, not denominational bias.
That's not grammar and is theological bias.

The aorist in this case speaks of a completed action in the past and provides no guaranty of future condition.

The perfect in itself speaks of an action in the past with continuing results up to the point of the author's writing with no guaranty of future condition.

Positional Sanctification is a theological construct used to name a theological interpretation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Qt
Thanks, but not interested in being led around bit by bit. Lay out your understanding of your 3rd way and support it with Scripture, or don't. I've already read a few brief summaries of Crabtree and have seen a few retorts against him.
The Third Way, as we are calling it, relies on an understanding of the nature of God and reality. It is only natural for me to ascertain your understanding of the relationship between God and his creation. But I see you have rejected the idea out of hand.
 
The Third Way, as we are calling it, relies on an understanding of the nature of God and reality. It is only natural for me to ascertain your understanding of the relationship between God and his creation. But I see you have rejected the idea out of hand.
I'm rejecting the approach. Just spell it out.
 
That's not grammar and is theological bias.

The aorist in this case speaks of a completed action in the past and provides no guaranty of future condition.

The perfect in itself speaks of an action in the past with continuing results up to the point of the author's writing with no guaranty of future condition.

Positional Sanctification is a theological construct used to name a theological interpretation.
You know what the aorist says, but you don't seem to know what it MEANS in this context. Paul has placed all the verbs in the aorist tense in order to group them all together in a tight grouping, which are to be considered as one act of the Holy Spirit.

This paraphrase captures Paul’s conviction: Whenever you were washed, you were also sanctified and justified in the name of our Lord Jesus through the Spirit of our God. Paul never separates these works. His point is that the Spirit’s cleansing is never a partial or isolated act. If the Holy Spirit has washed you, then in that same moment, He has also set you apart as holy and declared you righteous. There is no scenario in Paul’s mind where the Spirit grants one of these gifts without the others; the triad always arrives together as the unified work of God in Christ.

Paul intentionally stacks a series of aorist verbs in Romans 8:29–30 to make a single, unbroken argument: the God who foreknew is the same God who predestined, called, justified, and glorified. By placing all these actions in the same verbal frame, Paul is insisting that the entire sequence stands or falls together. There is no break in the chain, no point at which God’s purpose wavers or stalls. In Paul’s mind, you can draw a straight, unbroken line from “foreknown” all the way to “glorified.” And the rest of the chapter (vv. 31–39) is simply the emotional explosion of that logic: if God has already secured the end from the beginning, then nothing in heaven or on earth can sever the believer from the love of Christ.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rogerg
What most folks fail to comprehend is that salvation is not a one time deal, it has three parts - Justification, Sanctification, Glorification. Accepting Lord Jesus as Lord and Savior is Justification, afterward it's Sanctification by growing in spirit, and the end, the resurrection in new, incorruptible body and eternal union with the Lord is Glorification. In the parable of the sower, the stony ground is the unsaved without Justification; the shallow ground and thorny ground, however, are the ones with Justification but without Sanctification, the seed of the gospel is accepted, but failing to bear fruit; only the last group truly completes all three parts of salvation, and even for them, their yield varies - "some a hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty". So this is not a simple black and white dichotomy. As long as you think of salvation as a simple black and white dichotomy, you'll be confused by seemingly contradicting gospel verses, and you'll never get it.

“Behold, a sower went out to sow. And as he sowed, some seed fell by the wayside; and the birds came and devoured them. Some fell on stony places, where they did not have much earth; and they immediately sprang up because they had no depth of earth. But when the sun was up they were scorched, and because they had no root they withered away. And some fell among thorns, and the thorns sprang up and choked them. But others fell on good ground and yielded a crop: some a hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty. He who has ears to hear, let him hear!” (Matt. 13:3-9)

Therefore hear the parable of the sower: When anyone hears the word of the kingdom, and does not understand it, then the wicked one comes and snatches away what was sown in his heart. This is he who received seed by the wayside. But he who received the seed on stony places, this is he who hears the word and immediately receives it with joy; yet he has no root in himself, but endures only for a while. For when tribulation or persecution arises because of the word, immediately he stumbles. Now he who received seed among the thorns is he who hears the word, and the cares of this world and the deceitfulness of riches choke the word, and he becomes unfruitful. But he who received seed on the good ground is he who hears the word and understands it, who indeed bears fruit and produces: some a hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty. (Matt. 13:18-23)

Let's talk normal cases.

US A citizenship when you are born into it is not negotiable.
Yet, one can choose to be a bad citizen....
And be denied certain rights and privileges.

And, if need be?
Executed with capital punishment.

But they still remain a US citizen.

Under U.S. law, a citizen who is executed by the state via capital punishment retains their U.S. citizenship
up until the moment of death. Capital punishment is a penalty for a crime, not an act of denaturalization
or renunciation of citizenship.


So it is, when we become born again!

But our citizenship is in heaven. And we eagerly await a Savior from there, the Lord Jesus Christ."
Philippians 3:20
grace and peace...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lovette