Why Won't I Vote for Trump?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
All the more reason to not be adding to the misinformation.

anything other than, we currently have a vain, power-hungry mocker-in-chief actively seeking a totalitarian state, who has super successfully made merchandise of the gospel, is exactly misinformation.

thanks again idiot visible church. not for no reason we're called sheep - - sheep are **not** intelligent creatures.

i have said from day 1, this is a very dangerous man.
 
I have a new laptop and I'm getting used to it. One scenario is that governments tax each robot. The money is redistributed according to government rules. These can be used to control people. Non conformists will get little, puppets will prosper. China already has a social credit system. Behave and you will be rewarded. Misbehave and life will be miserable. Christians are assumed to be misbehaving and so punished.​

But your leaving out the way the companies who bought the robots would make the money back that they paid for the robots and who would be buying the products the robots made. If no humans were working and making money how would the companies who bought the robots make a profit? Another way to say it is if the people/citizens of a nation don't make money doing those jobs why would the companies buy the robots and the materials to make the products for the people if the people don't have any money to by the products with after the robots make them? If the robots make the products and grow the food then the people/humans are unnecessary unless they can buy those things from them. So who is the customer who would be able to buy the things the robots made for the owners of the companies? And how would the companies be able to pay the governments taxes if they have no customers to make money from if the humans were all replaced by robots?
 
it's still a mostly free country.
up to you to support or oppose The Liar.

but, quickly becoming up to The Liar whether your vote gets counted or not.

do you believe in God or do you believe in the GOP?

-- requires an honest answer, and that part is refreshing.


"choose this day who you serve"
 
but, quickly becoming up to The Liar whether your vote gets counted or not.

remember how The Liar directly addressed the idiot visible church in 2023 and said if the idiot visible church ((yes that's you, dear reader)) will sell their idiot conscience to him they will **never have to ((i.e. be able to)) vote again**?


remember how many times your excusing argument was, 'well he's stupid he doesn't mean what he says'?

hmm

enjoy
 
it's still a mostly free country.
up to you to support or oppose The Liar.

but, quickly becoming up to The Liar whether your vote gets counted or not.

do you believe in God or do you believe in the GOP?

-- requires an honest answer, and that part is refreshing.


"choose this day who you serve"

Fascist Authoritarianism has overthrown the GOP and Social Democracy. The American Eagle is dead in her nest in America.
 
  • Like
Reactions: posthuman
remember how The Liar directly addressed the idiot visible church in 2023 and said if the idiot visible church will sell their idiot conscience to him they will **never have to ((i.e. be able to)) vote again**?


rember how many times your excusing argument was, 'well he's stupid he doesn't mean what he says'?

hmm

enjoy

The answer was obvious the second any and all dissenters from within the GOP who raised issue over policy were immediately scorned,labeled RINO and ousted by running "yes men" candidates to fill their positions that Democracy had died in America and the Christian vote was no longer needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: posthuman
This is interesting.

GROK

Steve Bannon's War Room interview with John Solomon about a former federal prosecutor indicted for attempting to email herself a sealed copy of Jack Smith's Mar-a-Lago classified documents report.
The prosecutor, Carmen Mercedes Lineberger, allegedly renamed the files as "Bundt_Cake_Recipe.pdf" and "Chocolate_cake_recipe.pdf" in late 2025 to bypass DOJ email filters while working in the Southern District of Florida.
She faces felony charges including theft of government records and pleaded not guilty; authorities are investigating possible additional involvement in the case.




 
It's starting look like the whole $1.7 billion "victim fund" is merely an elaborate smokescreen to hide Donald's real motive. The Attorney General attached a rider to the so-called settlement agreement which releases the president and his family from their IRS tax fraud investigation which they've been under. Furthermore, it permanently bars the IRS from investigating them for tax fraud that is currently known or unknown, theoretically releasing from ever being investigated in the future. So while everyone has been preoccupied with paragraph A, paragraph C has largely gone unnoticed.

You can't make this stuff up; the whole thing's a joke and he's making the US look like a joke.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1441216/dl (PDF of Settlement Memo)


 
But your leaving out the way the companies who bought the robots would make the money back that they paid for the robots and who would be buying the products the robots made. If no humans were working and making money how would the companies who bought the robots make a profit? Another way to say it is if the people/citizens of a nation don't make money doing those jobs why would the companies buy the robots and the materials to make the products for the people if the people don't have any money to by the products with after the robots make them? If the robots make the products and grow the food then the people/humans are unnecessary unless they can buy those things from them. So who is the customer who would be able to buy the things the robots made for the owners of the companies? And how would the companies be able to pay the governments taxes if they have no customers to make money from if the humans were all replaced by robots?
To start with, governments would do what they've done for way too long. Print money. Also, the transition will take time to implement. The money redistributed would pay for the products and running costs. That would require tuning the tax rate accordingly. Will it work? I doubt it. Government programs rarely are efficient, fair and free of corruption. That's never stopped them trying.​
 
  • Like
Reactions: Squigglylines
anything other than, we currently have a vain, power-hungry mocker-in-chief actively seeking a totalitarian state, who has super successfully made merchandise of the gospel, is exactly misinformation.

thanks again idiot visible church. not for no reason we're called sheep - - sheep are **not** intelligent creatures.

i have said from day 1, this is a very dangerous man.
2 Timothy 2:16 But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness.
 
It's starting look like the whole $1.7 billion "victim fund" is merely an elaborate smokescreen to hide Donald's real motive.
Trump did not pocket the money and was awarded as an out-of-court settlement and decided to make it as a payout fund for J.6 victims. Why are you repeating lies your left-wing sources puke out to you? I don't understand why you guys love being lied to in the first place, since most people don't.

GROK


The settlement stems from the 2019–2020 unauthorized leak of Trump's tax returns by an IRS contractor. Background: The Leak Perpetrator: Charles Littlejohn, a former IRS contractor working for Booz Allen Hamilton.
What happened: Between 2018 and 2020, Littlejohn stole and leaked confidential tax information on thousands of wealthy Americans, including then-President Donald Trump (and his family/businesses). He specifically provided Trump's tax returns (covering about 15–20 years) to The New York Times and ProPublica.
Publication: The New York Times published a major story in September 2020 based on the leaked data, revealing details about Trump's taxes, losses, and payments.
Legal outcome for Littlejohn: He pleaded guilty in 2023 to unauthorized disclosure of tax returns (violating IRC Section 6103). He was sentenced to 5 years in prison.

The IRS and Treasury are required by law (Section 6103) to keep tax returns strictly confidential, with severe penalties for unauthorized disclosures. Trump’s side argued the agencies failed in their duty to safeguard the information. The Lawsuit Filed: January 29, 2026 (in Trump’s second term), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
Plaintiffs: Donald J. Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and the Trump Organization.
Defendant: IRS and Treasury Department.
Claim: $10 billion in damages for the unauthorized leak and alleged failure to protect the data. They used IRC Section 7431, which allows civil damages for unauthorized disclosures ($1,000 per unauthorized inspection/disclosure, plus actual damages). Trump’s team multiplied this aggressively by counting every view of the published articles as a separate violation.


The Attorney General attached a rider to the so-called settlement agreement which releases the president and his family from their IRS tax fraud investigation which they've been under.
There was nothing so-called about it. By Democrats (Like Littlejohn) for political purposes.

GROK

Yes, Charles Littlejohn has ties to Democratic or progressive circles, though not in the form of high-level official connections. Key Details on His Political Leanings: Democratic affiliations noted in reporting: Some outlets (including social media/news summaries) explicitly describe him as having Democratic affiliations.

facebook.com

Motivation and actions: Court documents and his own statements show he leaked Trump’s tax returns specifically to influence the 2020 presidential election (aimed at harming Trump) and to push for higher taxes on the wealthy — goals aligned with Democratic/progressive priorities at the time (e.g., wealth tax discussions by Warren, Sanders, etc.). He admitted acting to inform voters before the election.

taxnotes.com

Support from left-leaning groups: Progressive organizations like the Revolving Door Project and Patriotic Millionaires strongly defended him, launched campaigns (e.g., freecharleslittlejohn.com) to urge President Biden to commute his sentence, and portrayed him as a whistleblower exposing tax injustice rather than a criminal. Left-leaning media (Rolling Stone, The Intercept, etc.) echoed this.

You can't make this stuff up;
Yeah you can and do.




the whole thing's a joke and he's making the US look like a joke.
You puking out leftie talking points is the joke along with all the omissions. Democrat Littlejohn is in the slammer, and he got off lightly for his crimes and leaking them to a left-wing rag that published them. Trump's tax returns are none of your business. Democrat voyeurs and thieves. Guys like Trump have tax-compliant attorneys to do all that. There is nothing illegal there, and the Democrats simply assume guilt and are attempting to dirty Trump up with unoriginal, made-up crimes that get a lot of flashy headlines in left-wing rags. Any tax breaks are passed by Congress and benefit Democratic billionaires. No tax break remotely compares to the earned income tax benefit recipients for the under 50% crowd who really pay no taxes but get back more than they contribute. Looking for tax cheats? Look at all the ones who use the earned income tax benefit.
 
To start with, governments would do what they've done for way too long. Print money. Also, the transition will take time to implement. The money redistributed would pay for the products and running costs. That would require tuning the tax rate accordingly. Will it work? I doubt it. Government programs rarely are efficient, fair and free of corruption. That's never stopped them trying.​

Man has always it seems tried their very best to redistribute the sweat of their brow onto another. First they went for thousands of years with nation after nation using the forced labor of another in place of themselves to avoid having to labor by the sweat of their brow as God said in Genesis 3:19 . Now it seems that we no longer see to use the cheap labor of migrants or the penal system of forced labor in China and others and so we have redistributed the judgment of God in Genesis 3:19 onto another. And so now we have the new ethical human robot slave to redistribute the task onto in place of the slaves of men. One that everyone will not look upon as not an immorality when used as a forced laborer yet none the less the same. In our struggle to set off that punishment given in Genesis 3:19 we are now faced with redistributing it's cost one upon another. First the government will print money out of thin air then redistribute it to the companies who will pay it back in taxes to the government and redistribute the goods the robots made unto the people. All the while though it becomes more and more bankrupt. There's no way out of Genesis 3:19 yet man has always tried as they are even trying to do so today. In the end the governments,the businesses and the people will end up broke and they will labor by the sweat of their brow's to eat and the earth will bring forth thorns and thistles until they return to the dust. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis 3:19&version=KJV
 
Will the Donald resume strikes on Iran this weekend? Many signs point to yes. He cancelled a trip to Bedminster Golf Club this weekend and says he will stay at the White House instead. He also declined to attend Don Jr.'s wedding this weekend saying: "It is important for me to remain in Washington, D.C., at the White House during this important period of time." It wasn't so important of a time that he couldn't tell maga Mike to forget about voting on the war powers resolution and send Congress home. Iran and others are preparing for strikes this weekend. Will it happen? Hard to say, but I do think he's planning to.

 
The DOJ is removing from their website press releases on the charges against J6 rioters. They say it's part of a plan to strip the website of "partisan propaganda." Typical authoritarian scrubbing of facts they don't like. They can remove it from the website but they can't remove the truth.

 
If Iran wants nukes I say let them have them. A lot of countries have them, including Russia, North Korea and China; and the only country that has actually used them is the US back when no one else had them. Mutually assured destruction prevents countries from using them today. I don't think even Iran wants to be obliterated, which is what they'd be if they ever used one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeIsHere