I know, but Christians follow Christ's words in both the gospels and the epistles.
We have been learning GW about the same length of time, and heaven on a new earth is fine with me.
![]()
If they were following Christ's word, they would obey!
I know, but Christians follow Christ's words in both the gospels and the epistles.
We have been learning GW about the same length of time, and heaven on a new earth is fine with me.
![]()
God still foreknew what Esau would do. Nowhere does it say God made Esau to view the Birthright and Inheritance like he did and would just give it away. Esau still made decisions that God hated and God knew what Esau would do before he was ever born.
Not believing in heaven or Paul's doctrines, it is surprising you are allowed on CC,
2 Samuel 12.23 tells about David's child who died shortly after birth. He rejoiced once the baby had died because he said he can't come to me, but I shall see him again.
ALL BABIES GO TO HEAVEN. The only reason a person goes to hell is if he rejects God's offer of salvation.
If they were following Christ's word, they would obey!
That's absurd. The doctrines aren't Paul's they're God's, the most foundational of which, is Jesus Christ, the Savior. By
not believing in Christ as Savior, it is you who actually doesn't believe in heaven nor follow God's doctrines, but instead, in man.
They do (imperfectly), but not they who (perversely) do not believe in heaven or Paul's doctrines.
I have a different take on Ezekiel 37. Ezekiel's vision of the dry bones is not about the resurrection of individual people; It is a vision of the "resurrection" of the nation of Israel as a whole. The nation of Israel comes back to life, and it did come back to life in 1948. These aren't dead people coming back to life, they are alive and return to the land of Israel.the Word is not silent on children!
Revelation and Ezekiel have the answers, which I am almost certain you will reject
Ezekiel 37 is the 2nd resurrection back to physical bodies with blood and breathing air.
In my view, David wasn't saying that he would be with his son in heaven. He was saying that he would be with his son in the grave.2 Samuel 12.23 tells about David's child who died shortly after birth. He rejoiced once the baby had died because he said he can't come to me, but I shall see him again.
ALL BABIES GO TO HEAVEN. The only reason a person goes to hell is if he rejects God's offer of salvation.
Was this a response to my post? I'm not sure.God is not in the business of withholding salvation and bequeathing it to some arbitrarily.
But nice paragraph.
No one goes to heaven. Where did you get that Idea?it is hard to believe you would put Paul ahead of Christ especially after John said Paul is hard to understand and is leading many to destruction.
Show me clear words stating even one goes to heaven except Christ -- in 60 years none have be able to do so, you could be the first.
I do understand --- Paul can be understood to say nothing is required of you, only believe and grace, the get out of jail for free card, is there for you!
that you are accepted "JUST as you are" full of sin????
I pass! you may have my share.
I have a different take on Ezekiel 37. Ezekiel's vision of the dry bones is not about the resurrection of individual people; It is a vision of the "resurrection" of the nation of Israel as a whole. The nation of Israel comes back to life, and it did come back to life in 1948. These aren't dead people coming back to life, they are alive and return to the land of Israel.
The key to Ezekiel 37 is that God explicitly interprets the vision for Ezekiel: “These bones are the whole house of Israel.” The vision is symbolic, not literal. Ezekiel is watching the nation—dead in exile, politically shattered, spiritually cut off—being brought back to life as a people. The “resurrection” is corporate, covenantal, and national, not individual.
The Jewish return to Israel, the Aliyah, began in the earth 20th century and continues unto today. There will come a time, soon, that God will pour out his spirit on them. If I am right, Revelation chapter 7 represents these as the 144,000.
it is hard to believe you would put Paul ahead of Christ especially after John said Paul is hard to understand and is leading many to destruction.
Show me clear words stating even one goes to heaven except Christ -- in 60 years none have be able to do so, you could be the first.
I do understand --- Paul can be understood to say nothing is required of you, only believe and grace, the get out of jail for free card, is there for you!
that you are accepted "JUST as you are" full of sin????
I pass! you may have my share.
God is not in the business of withholding salvation and bequeathing it to some arbitrarily.
But nice paragraph.
Nope, just the older would serve the younger nothing about God interfering. That was Rebecka who devised the plan but God foreknew about it.Don't think so. Romans 9:11 - 12 we are told that the children (Jacob and Esau) were moved "by him that calleth" - that is, God - to do what they did in accordance with His purpose for election. The "shall serve" of v12, tells us beyond doubt that it would happen in that way. The whole episode of Esau's selling of his birthright and of all that caused him to do so, were from God's will, not from Jacob or Esau.
God explains that in order for His plan of Gen 25:23 to come to fruition, for the sake of election as it is described in Rom 9, He would make Esau relinquish his birthright so that he could serve Jacob - therefore, that Esau did so was the fulfillment of God's will - there was a much greater, significant, and overarching, plan at work than just of Esau's immediate choice to sell his birthright of which that was a part of.
[Rom 9:11-12 KJV]
11 (For [the children] being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth
12 It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger.
[Gen 25:23 KJV] 23 And the LORD said unto her, Two nations [are] in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and [the one] people shall be stronger than [the other] people; and the elder shall serve the younger.
Nope, just the older would serve the younger nothing about God interfering. That was Rebecka who devised the plan but God foreknew about it.
Incorrect. Plenty about God intervening. Read those verses closely. It's all there - it was all by God. So, I answered your question and we see the events differently, so, guess we're done.Nope, just the older would serve the younger nothing about God interfering. That was Rebecka who devised the plan but God foreknew about it.
When you get a chance read this piece, it cost a few bucks, but Im sure you would find it stimulating.Okay, makes sense to me. That it isn't the faith of the person to be saved, and that it somehow originated from Christ, is the pivotal point of the verse in my opinion. Although, and probably not directly related to the verse, I believe that the faith of Christ - Christ faith - was manifested in/by His allegiance to the Father and in His mission, and by which was salvation brought forth to fruition.