We can put one NT scripture and it show one of the prophecy from OT they the leaders miss interpeted. This NT script is from the Holy ghost now Word of God. did HS stop there,,? or is He still teaching speak newness ?
Let's see The Holy Spirit move
- Thread starter frederickdoc
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Im sure someone will start shed more light
I could say Bold By the Holy Spirit .This is not Emmanuel prophecy. This is the Messiah prophecy
I could say Bold By the Holy Spirit .This is not Emmanuel prophecy. This is the Messiah prophecy
We all already believe this read it many times but to actually know its from TheHoly Spirit that ups the walk
We all already believe this read it many times but to actually know its from Holy Spirit that ups the walk
Isaiah 60:21 (KJV): "Thy people also shall be all righteous... the branch [netzer] of my planting, the work of my hands, that I may be glorified."
Through the tender mercy of our God; whereby the dayspring from on high hath visited us,"
The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light: they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them hath the light shined." Zacharias N T luke
The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light: they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them hath the light shined." Zacharias N T luke
While Luke 1:78 is the only New Testament use, the word "dayspring" appears one other time in the entire KJV Bible, found in Job 38:12:
In Job, God uses the word to describe His sovereign power over the physical sunrise. In Luke, Zacharias uses it to describe the spiritual sunrise—Jesus coming down to shatter man darkness.
- Zechariah 3:8 (KJV): "...behold, I will bring forth my servant the BRANCH [Anatole / Dayspring]."
- Zechariah 6:12 (KJV): "Behold the man whose name is The BRANCH [Anatole / Dayspring]; and he shall grow up out of his place..."
- Jeremiah 23:5 (KJV): "...I will raise unto David a righteous Branch [Anatole / Dayspring]..."
The Holy Spirit is the One Who inspired the Scriptures, and what He says today is not going to be in addition to, or dif8ferent from, the truths of the bible.
Sorry, what does "This is not Emmanuel prophecy. This is the Messiah prophecy" mean? Do you think that Immanuel is Someone different to Jesus Christ, the Messiah? Not according to the bible:
(Mat 1:18) Now the birth of Jesus Christ was as follows: After His mother Mary was betrothed to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Spirit.
(Mat 1:19) Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not wanting to make her a public example, was minded to put her away secretly.
(Mat 1:20) But while he thought about these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, "Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take to you Mary your wife, for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit.
(Mat 1:21) And she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name JESUS, for He will save His people from their sins."
(Mat 1:22) So all this was done that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Lord through the prophet, saying:
(Mat 1:23) "BEHOLD, THE VIRGIN SHALL BE WITH CHILD, AND BEAR A SON, AND THEY SHALL CALL HIS NAME IMMANUEL," which is translated, "God with us."
Who do you mean by "we"? What do you mean by "this"? Just writing "We already believe this" leaves me wondering who and what you mean.
We have read this many times
We know it a true but its prob over looked in what the difference was by the scholars any uneducated you probably have to read more of the post I did add more scripture but no one yet has pointed out Why the scholars failed .
I'm digging on DaySpring
just read remember what the religious leaders said to Nicodemus and then go to what Nathaniel said I think to Andrew? Then you may start linkng all the prophecy from the main scripture posted plus few others I posted
But my question was, who do you mean by "we" and what to you mean by "it/this?" You say again, "We have read this many times." Who has read this many times? All the people here on Christian Chat? And what have they seen? You just say they have seen "this", but you don't say what "this" refers to.
No man child baby Jesus son of Mary Emmanuel not that prophecy
.The Messiah prophecy is what the religious leaders missed from the main scripture to behold
The religious leaders said to Nicodemus:
(Joh 7:52) "Are you also from Galilee? Search and look, for no prophet has arisen out of Galilee."
Nathanael said to Philip (not Andrew):
(Joh 1:46) "Can anything good come out of Nazareth?"
Both Nathanael and the religious leaders were under the mistaken impression that Jesus had been born in Nazareth in Galilee. Although He had been brought up there, we know He was born in Bethlehem.
Right, so you weren't saying that the Messiah is a different Person to Jesus Christ. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Peter full of the Holy Spirit Spoke with authority
Just like old text and new testament similarities but not exactly the word back anything
but to topic can u fig why words of the religious leaderd by what the spoke ke missed the Messiah
trust in him i know
all curds and honey Emmanuel diet
that all every one knows it seems? But I'm pretty sure Emmanuel's diet has a better foundation
Sorry, I am finding difficulty understanding what you mean.
I understand the first part about Peter being full of the Holy Spirit and speaking with authority.
However, I can't work out what: "Just like old text and new testament similarities but not exactly the word back anything" means.
I think I have worked out what: "but to topic can u fig why words of the religious leaderd by what the spoke ke missed the Messiah" means. Does it mean something like: "Back to the topic. Can you figure out why the words spoken by the religious leaders show that thewy did not recognise Jesus Christ as the promised Messiah"?