Why Won't I Vote for Trump?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Definitely cult behaviour (see item 2). Or did we do this already? I didn't check all the way back in the thread.

"Personality Cult: The movement revolves entirely around the leader rather than a consistent political philosophy. The leader is seen as the ultimate, unquestionable authority.

Nah, I held these ideas about politics and Israel long before Trump and will have after he leaves.
Alternative Reality: Facts, objective truth, and rational analysis are often rejected. The group creates its own version of history, trusting the leader’s word over verified evidence.

No, no one does this better than the Dems. Bidens own wife is now trying to convince the country she didn't know he was a dementia patient the 4 yrs he was in office.


Us vs. Them Mentality: The world is viewed in black-and-white. Anyone with differing political views is demonized as an enemy of the group or the nation.
The Word of God is our worldview.


Zero-Tolerance for Dissent: Any criticism of the leader or movement is dismissed as a conspiracy

Dems haven't stopped criticizing Trump @ family since he came down the elevator. If he cured a disease they'd rather hold their breath and die of it. Biden served 4yrs completely incapacitated and the entire MSM news looked the other way.

Justifying Extreme Actions: The leader's demands or actions are excused no matter how extreme, undermining traditional democratic or legal norms."

Yeah , Biden opened the borders, wide open for 4yrs. bet that helped the country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lightbeamrider
Oh well the Bible has often been used to support all manner of distortions, nothing new here.
Blackstone was no distortion, and you totally ignored it with a hand wave. Pathectic. If this is of God, and I believe it is, there is nothing you can do anyway. Whine all you want. I almost hope it keeps you awake at night and feeling miserable and angry at all the alleged injustice of it all.
 
Pretty sure Trump didn't name the cat, even if that was its name.
You did not know about the cat? Where is your head at?
How this is supposed to be a good thing,
Who said anything about a good thing? Referencing the voices in your head?
I'm not even going to try and guess, but credit to you for effort...
Your welcome. Your post makes no sense, and whatever point you are trying to make by confessing your ignorance is beyond me.
 
Another day, another attack on liberty.

NDAs are common in employment. What job do you have? Never mind, it must not be much. Did it ever occur to you Trump may have legit reasons for what he is doing? Leftie pigs putting the lives of political opponents in jeopardy along with their families.

GROK

Response to recent leaks: OPM cites specific incidents of "unauthorized disclosures" that disrupted operations, endangered lives, and eroded trust. Examples include:Leaks about planned immigration enforcement actions (FBI/DHS) that allegedly impeded law enforcement and put agents at risk.
Pre-raid disclosures about the U.S. operation to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, which reportedly risked service members' lives (news outlets held back publication).

Doxxing of ~4,500 ICE employees' personal info (names, addresses, etc.), leading to threats.
Broader leaks of pre-decisional documents, internal deliberations, and policy drafts (including some about OPM's own rules).

public-inspection.federalregister.gov

Protect internal deliberations and operations: Unauthorized leaks of non-public info (e.g., personnel matters, procurement, sensitive/pre-decisional material) chill candid feedback, disrupt decision-making, and weaken inter-agency trust. A standard NDA would remind employees of their duties and encourage open internal debate without fear of immediate public exposure. Next time you post a youtube thy avoiding a hate Trump site. A more neutral setting might be in order as opposed to one filtered through a bunch of hate-filled lefties.
--------------------
govexec.com

Standard practice, not new restrictions: It documents acknowledgment of existing laws (e.g., Standards of Ethical Conduct, Privacy Act, Federal Records Act) against improper disclosure.
Explicitly preserves whistleblower protections (disclosures to Congress, IG, etc., under the Whistleblower Protection Act).
Compared to the private sector, where NDAs for sensitive info are routine; "the federal government should not be held to a lower standard."

tullylegal.com

Accountability and consistency: OPM Director Scott Kupor has emphasized that this promotes accountability, informs employees of obligations, and is "Organizational Management 101." Agencies could optionally use it (voluntary to sign, but refusal could lead to removal). It ties into broader suitability/fitness rules.

thehill.com

Trump himself has not made detailed public statements on this specific OPM draft (it's an administrative proposal open for comment), but it aligns with his long-standing complaints about leaks, the "deep state," and government secrecy during his first term. Critics (including in The Atlantic piece) argue it could chill legitimate whistleblowing, but the administration frames it as basic protection for confidential info, akin to private business norms. The proposal is still in draft/comment phase.
 
This slush fund was just more proof the Donald doesn't give a rip about you the taxpayer. Thankfully this plot hasn't succeeded, but it should be a major wakeup call for everyone: There's no limit or bar too low for him if he can get away with it. He doesn't care about you or the country, only himself and those who bend the knee to him. Stop paying attention to what he and state-run media are telling you; pay attention to what he does.

 
  • Like
Reactions: true_believer
The peace president is in week 14 of his "very short" war. Does he have a plan or is he too preoccupied with his UFC fight on the White House lawn?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charlesiii
There's nothing wrong with this. If a person supports Nikki Haley, they automatically support everything that is destroying America. So why should they pretend to be a part of Make America Great Again (MAGA)?

In New Hampshire Birdbrain Nikki Haley received 70% of her support from Democrats. So what is 70% of a 43.2% bogus result? that is 30.24%. Now subtract that from 43.2% and what do you have? That is ONLY 12.96% (let's say 13%). And we don't know the number of Independents who voted for her. Had New Hampshire restricted voting to only Republicans, Nikki Haley might have received only half of that (say 6%).

So why is she still hanging in there? Simply to sabotage Trump (and no doubt with the encouragement of Democrats). Some of the billionaires who donated to her campaign have withdrawn their support, and almost everyone is telling Haley to quit. So it is partly ego and partly spite. The problem is that the lying MSM never do any investigative journalism to show the public what has really happened. In fact they twist the truth for their partisan politics.
BIG donors who donate to multiple parties are not supporting parties, they are attempting to buy political influence from mu;tiple sides, so they can caim tey deserve some financial or political favour from whoever wins.
 
This slush fund was just more proof the Donald doesn't give a rip about you the taxpayer. Thankfully this plot hasn't succeeded, but it should be a major wakeup call for everyone: There's no limit or bar too low for him if he can get away with it. He doesn't care about you or the country, only himself and those who bend the knee to him. Stop paying attention to what he and state-run media are telling you; pay attention to what he does.

Dropping a 10 billion dollar lawsuit against the IRS in favour of a 1.778 billion dollar recompense for citizens who were denied their constitutional rights and who were targeted by a Democrat controlled justice system for opposing their policies, would be saving the taxpayers 8.3222 billion dollars and redressing major injustices. However, the Democrats and RINOs and their Mainstream Media allies were managing to convince too many weak-minded Liberals and Progressives, whom Trump is trying to black-pill, that this act of redress was criminal and immoral. I guess he’ll just have to continue with his 10 billion dollar case and then disburse the even greater amount after he wins.

His administration has been recovering up to about 1 trillion dollars in Democrat fraud and theft in the last 18 months and is building the citizens a new Whitehouse ballroom and bunker for free, and has given away his salary every one of his five years as president, so I would say he has overwhelmingly benefitted the citizens and reduced fraud, waste, abuse and theft of taxpayer dollars.
 
Dropping a 10 billion dollar lawsuit against the IRS in favour of a 1.778 billion dollar recompense for citizens who were denied their constitutional rights and who were targeted by a Democrat controlled justice system for opposing their policies, would be saving the taxpayers 8.3222 billion dollars and redressing major injustices.
It was actually $1.776 billion.

What Constitutional rights were they exercising when they broke into the Capitol, attacked police and security, and threatened to kill members of Congress? Maybe that's something you'd like to see in the Constitution, but last time I checked there's nothing there that gives anyone that right; unless I'm missing something.

Let's say for the sake of argument his policies have saved taxpayers $8.3222 billion. Are you saying that gives him the right to dip his fingers into the Treasury whenever he feels like it? Better check your Constitution again if you think that's case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: true_believer
It was actually $1.776 billion.

What Constitutional rights were they exercising when they broke into the Capitol, attacked police and security, and threatened to kill members of Congress? Maybe that's something you'd like to see in the Constitution, but last time I checked there's nothing there that gives anyone that right; unless I'm missing something.

Let's say for the sake of argument his policies have saved taxpayers $8.3222 billion. Are you saying that gives him the right to dip his fingers into the Treasury whenever he feels like it? Better check your Constitution again if you think that's case.
That was all answered and ignored by you in my #1211.
Like a bot, lefties keep on spamming the thread with leftie talking points and basically lies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PaulThomson
Well, it was bound to happen. The Donald is blaming Netanyahu for his woes in Iran. Sorry Donald, you beak it you buy it. He scolds Netanyahu for killing civilians and knocking over buildings in Lebanon. He didn't seem that concerned about killing civilians and knocking over buildings in Gaza when he thought he and his "Board of Peace" would be taking it over.