How do our dogmas drive our perceptions of the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

biblestudent78

Well-known member
Nov 24, 2025
801
266
63
Richmond Texas
Virtually every Christian who reads or listens to sermons about the bible does so in a framework of unique dogmas. Dogmas are self-supporting frameworks that define the limits of acceptable belief. These are the traditional approaches handed down from generation to generation. Most spring from the 16th through the 20th centuries and are handed down. What we accept as dogmas (agreed upon perceptions) each competing Christian denomination considers them their unique and defining "truths."

Official dogmas change on a more or less regular basis. The Roman Catholic Church for instance "revised" their dogma about indulgences in wake of the rise of Protestantism but later added dogmas related to the Immaculate Conception of Mary. They gave up their dogmas about an earth centered universe to accommodate the scientific findings of Copernicus and Galileo. Pope Francis updated the Catechism of the Catholic Church to declare the death penalty "inadmissible," altering a centuries-old allowance. July 18, 1870, which declared that the Pope is infallible when speaking ex cathedra (from the chair) on matters of faith or morals.

Martin Luter is famous for his "faith alone. Grace alone" theology but his definition of faith required proof of validity by the "fruits" one produced. But an entire wing of later Protestants rejected any actual proof of saving faith other than to claim it and established several dogmas in support. The Frenchman Calvin introduced dogmas that defined that had already predetermined who He would and would not save and there was nothing humans could do about it. That and related dogmas are held by branches of Christianity today. Jacob Arminius & Arminians disputed Calvin's dogmas and introduced a new set of dogmas. The dogmas coming from these two factions are incorporated in a majority of competing Protestant congregations today. Pentecostalism is a Protestant movement defined by the active, present-day work of the Holy Spirit. Its dogmas are rooted in the "fourfold" (or fivefold) gospel: Jesus as Savior, Baptizer in the Holy Spirit, Healer, and Returning King, baptism of the Holy Spirit, Speaking tongues, spiritual gifts, divine healing and premillennialism.

There are dogmas about Transubstantiation, the Trinity, Apokatastasis (Universal Reconciliation) and the Rapture and End Times.

These dogmas are circular ways of interpreting scripture where the dogma sits at the center of scriptural perception thus "proving" that the dogma is true. Defending our dogmas makes up the big portion of conversation on this cite. So, the question is are we even aware of our dogmas or have we accepted them as "universal truth?" We claim that our "interpretation" of the bible is the right one, when in fact we are simply repeating dogmas invented by others for the last 2,000 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anchorite
No dogmas

John 16
13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DavidLamb
Virtually every Christian who reads or listens to sermons about the bible does so in a framework of unique dogmas. Dogmas are self-supporting frameworks that define the limits of acceptable belief. These are the traditional approaches handed down from generation to generation. Most spring from the 16th through the 20th centuries and are handed down. What we accept as dogmas (agreed upon perceptions) each competing Christian denomination considers them their unique and defining "truths."

Official dogmas change on a more or less regular basis. The Roman Catholic Church for instance "revised" their dogma about indulgences in wake of the rise of Protestantism but later added dogmas related to the Immaculate Conception of Mary. They gave up their dogmas about an earth centered universe to accommodate the scientific findings of Copernicus and Galileo. Pope Francis updated the Catechism of the Catholic Church to declare the death penalty "inadmissible," altering a centuries-old allowance. July 18, 1870, which declared that the Pope is infallible when speaking ex cathedra (from the chair) on matters of faith or morals.

Martin Luter is famous for his "faith alone. Grace alone" theology but his definition of faith required proof of validity by the "fruits" one produced. But an entire wing of later Protestants rejected any actual proof of saving faith other than to claim it and established several dogmas in support. The Frenchman Calvin introduced dogmas that defined that had already predetermined who He would and would not save and there was nothing humans could do about it. That and related dogmas are held by branches of Christianity today. Jacob Arminius & Arminians disputed Calvin's dogmas and introduced a new set of dogmas. The dogmas coming from these two factions are incorporated in a majority of competing Protestant congregations today. Pentecostalism is a Protestant movement defined by the active, present-day work of the Holy Spirit. Its dogmas are rooted in the "fourfold" (or fivefold) gospel: Jesus as Savior, Baptizer in the Holy Spirit, Healer, and Returning King, baptism of the Holy Spirit, Speaking tongues, spiritual gifts, divine healing and premillennialism.

There are dogmas about Transubstantiation, the Trinity, Apokatastasis (Universal Reconciliation) and the Rapture and End Times.

These dogmas are circular ways of interpreting scripture where the dogma sits at the center of scriptural perception thus "proving" that the dogma is true. Defending our dogmas makes up the big portion of conversation on this cite. So, the question is are we even aware of our dogmas or have we accepted them as "universal truth?" We claim that our "interpretation" of the bible is the right one, when in fact we are simply repeating dogmas invented by others for the last 2,000 years.

The dogma in 2Thes. 2:10 defines the limit of acceptable belief IMO: Truth.
 
Dogmatism is the rigid adherence to a specific set of beliefs, teachings, or doctrines, treating them as unquestionably true, regardless of evidence or opposing viewpoints. It is characterized by closed-mindedness, a refusal to consider alternative perspectives, and a tendency to assert opinions in an arrogant or dictatorial manner.

Dogma can be based on a person’s own biblical research, or on traditions handed down in a family, or training by a church or seminary.

Dogmatic people are dismissive of critical thinking and combative toward opposing views. They often relish forcing their doctrines on others and ridiculing contrary views. They tend to be brash, egotistic, and insulting.

They consider discussions as contests they must win by conquering or mocking those who express different opinions.

They tend to be thin-skinned and cannot tolerate being corrected or questioned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DavidLamb
Virtually every Christian who reads or listens to sermons about the bible does so in a framework of unique dogmas. Dogmas are self-supporting frameworks that define the limits of acceptable belief. These are the traditional approaches handed down from generation to generation. Most spring from the 16th through the 20th centuries and are handed down. What we accept as dogmas (agreed upon perceptions) each competing Christian denomination considers them their unique and defining "truths."

Official dogmas change on a more or less regular basis. The Roman Catholic Church for instance "revised" their dogma about indulgences in wake of the rise of Protestantism but later added dogmas related to the Immaculate Conception of Mary. They gave up their dogmas about an earth centered universe to accommodate the scientific findings of Copernicus and Galileo. Pope Francis updated the Catechism of the Catholic Church to declare the death penalty "inadmissible," altering a centuries-old allowance. July 18, 1870, which declared that the Pope is infallible when speaking ex cathedra (from the chair) on matters of faith or morals.

Martin Luter is famous for his "faith alone. Grace alone" theology but his definition of faith required proof of validity by the "fruits" one produced. But an entire wing of later Protestants rejected any actual proof of saving faith other than to claim it and established several dogmas in support. The Frenchman Calvin introduced dogmas that defined that had already predetermined who He would and would not save and there was nothing humans could do about it. That and related dogmas are held by branches of Christianity today. Jacob Arminius & Arminians disputed Calvin's dogmas and introduced a new set of dogmas. The dogmas coming from these two factions are incorporated in a majority of competing Protestant congregations today. Pentecostalism is a Protestant movement defined by the active, present-day work of the Holy Spirit. Its dogmas are rooted in the "fourfold" (or fivefold) gospel: Jesus as Savior, Baptizer in the Holy Spirit, Healer, and Returning King, baptism of the Holy Spirit, Speaking tongues, spiritual gifts, divine healing and premillennialism.

There are dogmas about Transubstantiation, the Trinity, Apokatastasis (Universal Reconciliation) and the Rapture and End Times.

These dogmas are circular ways of interpreting scripture where the dogma sits at the center of scriptural perception thus "proving" that the dogma is true. Defending our dogmas makes up the big portion of conversation on this cite. So, the question is are we even aware of our dogmas or have we accepted them as "universal truth?" We claim that our "interpretation" of the bible is the right one, when in fact we are simply repeating dogmas invented by others for the last 2,000 years.
A dogma I have recently rejected is dispensationalism, along with its pre-tribulation rapture of the saints and the two peoples of God. I found that many were saying that certain scriptures were not for the Church but for Israel alone. Whole parts of the Gospels were seen in this way. I began to question this view. Upon further study I came to realize that there is only ONE people of God, not two. The Church is the fulfillment of the nation of Israel as a people of God.
I also found that the idea that the lands of Palestine belong to the nation Israel to have no New Testament foundation. The New Testament writers see the OT promises of the Land fulfilled in Christ-the True Israel and the Church-the Israel of God.
All in all, dispensationalism in my mind, is nothing but a human template placed on the Scriptures not something derived from it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dkontner
We claim that our "interpretation" of the bible is the right one, when in fact we are simply repeating dogmas invented by others for the last 2,000 years.
Here is the thing -----anyone who can read ---can read the Logos word ----and through their human intellectual Faith can interpret what they think is their Worldly understanding is of what a piece of scripture is saying and believe they are right ----and for them it is right =====as they have no spiritual understanding of interpreting God's word which has True Spiritual meaning -----

The Bible is a Spiritual book and every piece of Scripture has a TRUE SPIRITUAL MEANING -----which the unbeliever cannot grasp =as they have not the Ability to Grasp what is Spiritual ---

So lets take this scripture ------

Matthew 19:24
Berean Standard Bible
Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.”

How would an unbeliever interpret this scripture -----


Well I have heard from others this -----they interpret it as a rich man can't get into heaven -----i have heart it said that there is a gate in Jerusalem called the eye of the needle which is narrow and camels can pass through the gate if they unload the camel -----so in their human thinking it is impossible for a camel to go through a narrow gate -----and they believe they have it right ---

and by the way there is no Gate in Jerusalem called --the Narrow Gate -----

These are Human intellectual interpretations not Spiritual ----



God says this ===about the Natural unbelieving man


! Corinthians 2:14
AMP
But the natural [unbelieving] man does not accept the things [the teachings and revelations] of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness [absurd and illogical] to him; and he is incapable of understanding them, because they are spiritually discerned and appreciated, [and he is unqualified to judge spiritual matters].

The Pharisees are a great example of their own dogma interpretation of Scripture ----they had absolutely no idea what Jesus was teaching Spiritually ---- they believed they were right in their interpretation and Jesus was wrong ----
They not only couldn't grasp the Spiritual meaning they Added their own rules and regulations to God's word -----


Their is only ONE RIGHT SPIRITUAL INTERPRETER of Scripture and That Is the HOLY SPIRIT -----Believers have the indwelling of the HOLY SPIRIT and are capable of getting the Right Spiritual Interpretation if they RELY ON and ASK the HOLY SPIRIT for help in ILLUMINATING the Spiritual Meaning to them
Many Born Again Christians don't rely on the Holy Spirit to help them in their interpretation of Scripture and that is what is SAD ----
The Holy Spirit gives you the RHEMA Word ----which is the spoken word ---the meaning behind the LOGOS Word ----and only believers have that luxury----
1 John 2:27

AMP
As for you, the anointing [the special gift, the preparation] which you received from Him remains [permanently] in you, and you have no need for anyone to teach you.

But just as His anointing teaches you [giving you insight through the presence of the Holy Spirit] about all things, and is true and is not a lie, and just as His anointing has taught you, you must remain in Him [being rooted in Him, knit to Him].
  • Divine Guidance: The Holy Spirit helps human readers understand the spiritual meaning of the text.
  • Beyond Intellect: Reading Scripture requires more than just academic study or intellectual ability.

Worth Repeating Folks ----
Reading Scripture requires more than just academic study or intellectual ability.
 
The whole Bible is true and no part of it should be interpreted as contradicting another part. Jesus and the Apostles should not be interpreted as expressing views that are contrary or override what they considered to be Scripture. For example, Jesus quoted three times from Deuteronomy in order to defeat the temptations of Satan, which included saying that man shall not live by bread alone but by every word that comes from the mouth of God, so neither he nor the Apostles should be interpreted as speaking obeying anything that comes from the mouth of God. In Deuteronomy 13, the way that God instructed to determine that someone is a false prophet is if they speak against obeying what He has spoken, so it is either incorrect to interpret the Apostles as doing that or they were false prophets, but either way followers of Christ should follow his example of living by every word that comes from the mouth of God. The bottom line is that we must obey God rather than man, so even if it were true that the Apostles should be interpreted as speaking against living any word that comes the mouth of God, then we should be quicker to disregard everything that they said than to disregard any word that comes from the mouth of God.