So people here who disagree with you are demon influenced?99% of all people?
Or, 99% of the few birds of a feather who hang around here?
Should have waited for his last post before commenting.You persist in twisting his words, over and over again.
Go back and read what @Genez said.
No mention of agreeing or disagreeing.
He rants and raves about phalluses and third eyes and a bunch of other demonic garbage. Sounds like he just came out of a coven. He is a manipulative bully who wants to pretend it is because of my beautiful avatar. He does this because he cannot refute Scripture, so he attacks me instead like others slanderers here; they can’t stand that my theology is Bible‑anchored, not personality‑anchored, not tradition‑anchored, not “hive‑mind” anchored or based on traditions of men. So they assign motives I don’t have, invent beliefs I don’t hold, accuse me of things I’ve never said, twist my avatar into something sinister... again and again while pretending they know my influences so they can project their perversions onto me. It’s spiritual gaslighting. And it’s wicked. He is a liar.Should have waited for his last post before commenting.
Are you ever demon influenced?
You believe he is referring to people he agrees with?
Can God forget? seems like a very answerable question.. Question is why is it being dodged?Illogical question (?)
I certainly agree that family lineage will not get anybody to heaven. I don't agree that Romans doesn't teach the Doctrines of Grace. Romans 8 says:The Book of Romans does not teach TULIP.... no sovereign election for salvation anywhere.
The purpose of Romans 9.
You cannot claim your family lineage as why you should get heaven.
Romans 9:33 KJVS
As it is written, Behold, I lay in Sion a stumbling stone and rock of offense: and whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.
That is a major problem for some of the free willers in this thread since they do notHaving condemned these heresies, Paul declares that the source of our salvation is God showing mercy -
only God showing mercy; he proclaims that salvation depends upon God showing mercy - only upon
God showing mercy. This is the message of Calvinism; and because it is, our defense of Calvinism is
a bold, uncompromisingly, unashamed defense. We say of Calvinism what B. B. Warfield once said of it:
"the future of Christianity - as its past has done - lies in its hands."
He rants and raves about phalluses and third eyes and a bunch of other demonic garbage. Sounds like he just came out of a coven. He is a manipulative bully who wants to pretend it is because of my beautiful avatar. He does this because he cannot refute Scripture, so he attacks me instead like others slanderers here; they can’t stand that my theology is Bible‑anchored, not personality‑anchored, not tradition‑anchored, not “hive‑mind” anchored or based on traditions of men. So they assign motives I don’t have, invent beliefs I don’t hold, accuse me of things I’ve never said, twist my avatar into something sinister... again and again while pretending they know my influences so they can project their perversions onto me. It’s spiritual gaslighting. And it’s wicked. He is a liar.
One should never refer to Calvinist TULIP teachings as the “Doctrines of Grace”. The TULIP teachings are the Doctrines of Limited Grace.I certainly agree that family lineage will not get anybody to heaven. I don't agree that Romans doesn't teach the Doctrines of Grace. Romans 8 says:
(Rom 8:28 NKJV) And we know that all things work together for good to those who love God, to those who are the called according to His purpose.
(Rom 8:29) For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren.
God foreknew, God predestined.
Have you started reading the Bible yet?One should never refer to Calvinist TULIP teachings as the “Doctrines of Grace”. The TULIP teachings are the Doctrines of Limited Grace.
that is a interesting point. I have been told my many Calvinist when confronted about those who received the Gospel message yet did not get saved.One should never refer to Calvinist TULIP teachings as the “Doctrines of Grace”. The TULIP teachings are the Doctrines of Limited Grace.
How could they have believed they were saved and also that God didthat is a interesting point. I have been told my many Calvinist when confronted about those who received the Gospel message yet did not get saved.
They said: That was due to the fact God did not choose them.
I was Told by many Calvinist that they refused to believe that the Blood of Jesus IF was for those who heard the Gospel would have saved them.
Therefore Calvinist refuse to believe the Blood of Jesus would be wasted and ineffective to save one who is NOT to BE saved.
That is an opinion Not seen in the word of God.
Can you define grace?that is a interesting point. I have been told my many Calvinist when confronted about those who received the Gospel message yet did not get saved.
They said: That was due to the fact God did not choose them.
I was Told by many Calvinist that they refused to believe that the Blood of Jesus IF was for those who heard the Gospel would have saved them.
Therefore Calvinist refuse to believe the Blood of Jesus would be wasted and ineffective to save one who is NOT to BE saved.
That is an opinion Not seen in the word of God.
Notice how faith is framed in this verse, contrary to how Calvinist/TULIPISTS/Reformed claim.
Romans 9:31-32 NKJV -
Israel, pursuing the law of righteousness, has not attained to the law of righteousness.
32 Why? Because they did not seek it by faith, but as it were, by the works of the law.
They are conned for not seeking righteousness by faith.
Belief/Faith is a passive act of the will.
And it determines what we pursue and how.
If faith is just a gift, then you would not be condemned for what we don’t have.
But Israel is condemned, not for what they don’t have, but how they pursue righteousness.
Yes they are.. He gathers them in by the call before they believe Jn 11:51-52
51 And this spake he not of himself: but being high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus should die for that nation;
52 And not for that nation only, but that also he should gather together in one the children of God that were scattered abroad.
Arent His Lost unbelieving Sheep still His Sheep before they hear and believe ? Jn 10:16
16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.
Same difference, Sheep are another name for Children of God