Try matching the Truths of tulip with the things Jesus taught.
As I feared , Calvin before Christ. as for what you said I already did try and match and is does not, there are major differences here is one point a post I prepared yesterday;
If you want one argument that goes to the heart of Calvinism (especially TULIP), it is this:
Jesus taught that people are condemned because they refuse God's offer, not because they were never chosen or never able to respond (John 3:19-20; John 5:40; Matthew 23:37; Luke 19:41-42; Matthew 11:28; John 7:37; John 12:46-48).
This strikes at the foundation of Total Depravity (as inability), Unconditional Election, Irresistible Grace, and Limited Atonement all at once.
Jesus repeatedly places the responsibility on the person.
Jerusalem, Jerusalem, that kills the prophets, and stones them that are sent unto her! how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathers her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!
Matthew 23:37 (ASV)
Notice what Jesus says. He
wanted to gather them, but
they were not willing. He does not say they could not come because they were not elected. He says they
would not. This is the difference between inability and unwillingness.
Jesus also said:
And ye will not come to me, that ye may have life.
John 5:40 (ASV)
Again, the problem is not that they were incapable of coming. The problem is that
they refused.
Jesus even wept over Jerusalem because of their rejection.
And when he drew nigh, he saw the city and wept over it, saying, If thou hadst known in this day, even thou, the things which belong unto peace! but now they are hid from thine eyes.
Luke 19:41-42 (ASV)
If God had eternally decreed that these people could never come, why would Jesus grieve over their refusal? His sorrow shows that their rejection was real and that His invitation was genuine.
The same truth appears in one of the clearest invitations in Scripture.
Come unto me, all ye that labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.
Matthew 11:28 (ASV)
Jesus invites
all. He does not say, "Come, only those secretly elected." His invitation is sincere. Likewise:
If any man thirst, let him come unto me and drink.
John 7:37 (ASV)
"If any man" means exactly what it says.
Finally, Jesus explains why people perish.
And this is the judgment, that the light is come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather than the light; for their works were evil. John 3:19 (ASV)
They are condemned because they
loved darkness, not because they were created without the ability to believe.
This is the central weakness in Calvinism. Calvin's system begins with the idea that fallen man is morally unable to respond to God unless God first regenerates him. Jesus never says this. Instead, He consistently says people
hear,
see,
know, are
invited, and are condemned because they
refuse,
will not come,
love darkness, and
reject God's call. I have explained all this already in this thread.
A person cannot be held justly responsible for refusing an invitation he was never capable of accepting. Yet Jesus holds people responsible precisely because they could have responded but chose not to.
That is why the words of Jesus are so powerful against TULIP. His teaching presents salvation as a real invitation that people are free to accept or reject. Their condemnation comes from their own choice, not from an eternal decree that made faith impossible for them. This is consistent with God's character throughout Scripture: He calls, invites, warns, pleads, and judges people according to how they respond to His call.