I do tend to avoid lengthy explanations, although there are times when
they are necessary. Some people seem to do or be the opposite way LOL
Well we are all different and see things differently and I do not subscribe to
the cookie cutter Christianity I notice in FWers with their cardboard God.
Such as those saying God would not command something if it cannot be obeyed. The law was
given specifically to show man his sinful nature... added to act as a mirror that reveals our
inability to achieve God’s perfect righteousness. Its purpose is to make us conscious of sin and
drive us toward divine grace. Through the law comes the knowledge of sin, entering "so that the
offense might abound." FWers even deny this. The law was brought in so that the trespass might
increase. But where sin increased, grace increased all the more. Romans 5 v 20. I hope they learn this.
I do not consider you to be a FWer. I may not agree with everything you say but I do
recognize that your understanding is well above and beyond the FWers here on that
topic. Eh I thought we were in the other thread... so I have moved my response to here.
God hates those who demean His love and justness.
To say that tulip magnifies divine love and mercy is lunacy!
(I respected Rufus for admitting tulip does not do that.)
Tulipists who claim that need to pray for the gifts of sanity and truthfulness/honesty.
This shows
I am not Arminian, so that point is moot.
God hates those who demean His love and justness.
To say that tulip magnifies divine love and mercy is lunacy!
(I respected Rufus for admitting tulip does not do that.)
Tulipists who claim that need to pray for the gifts of sanity and truthfulness/honesty.
Yes, the modern/current debate is between tulipists and MFWers.
Interesting he admitted that, I agree, I do have some minimal respect for those who are willing to be honest about the implications, logical conclusion of their doctrine.
The "we don't believe that" is very disingenuous.
If God has made it so the fallen nature of mankind means they are born unable to respond positively to the Good New of Christ Jesus,
unless uniquely and divinely selected for divine intervention then there are consequences that must also be acknowledged that follow that premise.
And they "fit themselves for destruction" is an epic fail on trying to assign blame back onto non saved- mankind for not having been selected.
I'm not sure what your objection might be, but I can take a few guesses. First, some people object to the phrase "eternal punishment" because they don't believe the Bible teaches eternal torment or everlasting torture. I agree, the Bible doesn't teach that sinners will suffer everlasting torture. What I mean by "eternal punishment" is that it is permanent and cannot be undone. Jesus describes it as eternal destruction, which is a condition that will be eternally permanent.Absolutely agree.
They cannot understand this though.
My concern was your addition of the concept of eternal punishment to the phrase.
It is not there in Ephesians.
Re "Such as those saying God would not command something if it cannot be obeyed.":
MFWers say a loving and just God would not do that, and the astute notice that Mag omitted key words,
because she realizes that doing so would burst the tulip bubble.
I'm not sure what your objection might be, but I can take a few guesses. First, some people object to the phrase "eternal punishment" because they don't believe the Bible teaches eternal torment or everlasting torture. I agree, the Bible doesn't teach that sinners will suffer everlasting torture. What I mean by "eternal punishment" is that it is permanent and cannot be undone. Jesus describes it as eternal destruction, which is a condition that will be eternally permanent.
You might object on the basis that the term "dead" doesn't include the concept of "eternal punishment." I agree. The term "dead" does not mean anything like eternal punishment. Interestingly, according to Jesus, not even death was permanent, not even death could be undone. He taught his disciples that death was only temporary and that a person's final state would be determined by how a person was situated to Jesus. A person who is a follower of Jesus will be brought back from the dead and given new life.
Paul’s use of “dead” in Ephesians 2 doesn’t, by itself, carry the idea of eternal punishment—but the *context* does. Paul immediately pairs “dead” with being made “alive” together with Christ, and that contrast only makes full sense when viewed through the lens of eternity. Jesus teaches that heaven is a realm where moth and rust cannot touch anything—where life is everlasting and untouched by decay. So when Paul speaks of being “dead” or “alive,” he is not merely describing moral condition or present experience; he is locating the human condition within an eternal framework. “Dead” describes a state that cannot inherit the everlasting kingdom, while “alive” describes the Spirit‑given life that endures forever. In other words, even though the word “dead” doesn’t *contain* the idea of eternal punishment, Paul’s argument is unmistakably oriented toward eternal destiny—life with Christ or life apart from Him.
All men by nature hate God and are at enmity against Him. Paul describes the gentile world here Rom 1:29-31God hates those who demean His love and justness.
You call folk calvinist dont you ?This shows
I am not Arminian, so that point is moot.
"FORCES" - chuckle!!! It's called "Conviction of SIN by the Holy Spirit"!!!!! Repentance, and calling out in FAITH (which come by God's WORD) is up to us.Wrong. Calvinism proclaims salvation is by God regenerating a person first, then the person exercises faith.
Calvinism has salvation backwards. It claims that even though Jesus preached “Repent and believe the gospel”, no one can obey that command. It teaches that God forces repentance upon a person.
"Calvinism" is a "Theological systematic" - nothing more!!!!!What if im one of the "elect" but dont believe calvinism? Am I good or lost?
A born‑again person becomes spiritually awakened—given a new capacity to see the kingdom of God the way Jesus describes in John 3. In that moment, God’s Spirit brings life where there was only spiritual deadness. The individual receives a new heart that desires God, a new mind that understands spiritual truth, and a new identity as a child of God. Their relationship to sin changes: instead of being comfortable in darkness, they now hunger for righteousness. Their relationship to God changes: instead of fear or distance, they experience forgiveness, adoption, and the inner witness of the Spirit. And their relationship to the world changes: they begin to recognize God’s reign, God’s purposes, and God’s presence in ways they simply could not perceive before. Being born again is not just a moral improvement—it is a Spirit‑created transformation that enables a person to live in God’s reality.
Paul’s opening movement in Romans 8 makes the same essential claim Jesus makes in John 3: when the Spirit dwells in a person, their condition before God fundamentally changes. Paul ties the Spirit’s indwelling directly to being “in Christ”—a new realm of existence where condemnation is gone, the mind is set on life and peace, and the believer is empowered to walk in righteousness. This Spirit‑created union with Christ is not merely a moral shift but a new identity and new spiritual reality. And because the Spirit who indwells believers is the very Spirit who raised Jesus from the dead, Paul says that those who are **in Christ** can confidently look forward to being raised to life themselves. In other words, the same Spirit who awakens a person to see the kingdom also guarantees their future resurrection, making the born‑again experience both a present transformation and a promise of coming glory.
We could go into detail and examine these passages if you like
You call folk calvinist dont you ?
Tulipists who claim that need to pray for the gifts of sanity and truthfulness/honesty.
wrong on conditional salvation
Even though the New Testament teaches salvation is in fact conditional.
Yes I know what you believe, you have not changed from the last few iterations of yourself.