Like Paul? Oh, yes. Yes, they do.It seems to me that "Christian history" holds murderous (either by their own hands or influence) Christians in high regard....
Like Paul? Oh, yes. Yes, they do.It seems to me that "Christian history" holds murderous (either by their own hands or influence) Christians in high regard....
Saul maybe but Paul was true to the faith - Maybe Calvinism can be compare to Saul - thinking they are doing Gods work but notLike Paul? Oh, yes. Yes, they do.
The Apostle Paul did not officially change his name from Saul. He had both namesSaul maybe but Paul was true to the faith - Maybe Calvinism can be compare to Saul - thinking they are doing Gods work but not
it does speak of the age/end times ( the king destroyed their cities) , but yes its about the selection of who will be chosen at the end, Here is the meaning step by step for this Parable of the wedding feast.Well, this is why understanding the age/times Jesus was speaking in and the age to come shortly according to Jesus is so important.
I am quite sure this is not about the selection of some for salvation imo.
knowing God and Jesus yes but most of all do what God and Jesus says, otherwise its all for nothing.Eternal life is knowing God and Jesus...John 17:3. That it comes with greater degree and blessing in glory doesn't negate its reality in the here and now.
Wow - you come across as a very paranoid conspiracy theorist - and the only slander I see comes from youThe Apostle Paul did not officially change his name from Saul. He had both names
from birth, which was a common custom in the first century. "Saul" was his Hebrew
name, and "Paul" was his Roman name because he was born a Roman citizen.
But FWers love lying about Calvin and then defending Paul who did essentially the same thing.
Of course we know why the FWers slander and lie about Calvin. They hope to
increase the weight of their smear campaign with the use of logical fallacies.
Logical fallacies are flaws in reasoning that weaken arguments and make conclusions invalid.
But FWers don't care. They haven't much else.
You weren't created to obey rules. You were created to glorify God and enjoy Him forever.knowing God and Jesus yes but most of all do what God and Jesus says, otherwise its all for nothing.
Unlearned rabbit trail questionSurely scripture says we have the promise of eternal life, we are sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise etc. If we have it now before the resurrection then why do we die ?
it does speak of the age/end times ( the king destroyed their cities) , but yes its about the selection of who will be chosen at the end, Here is the meaning step by step for this Parable of the wedding feast.
The king
The king represents God the Father.
The king's son
The son is Jesus Christ. The wedding feast celebrates the Son and His kingdom.
The wedding feast
The feast represents the joy and blessing of entering God's Kingdom and sharing eternal life with Christ. Throughout Scripture, God's Kingdom is often pictured as a great banquet.
Jesus also said: But I say to you that many will come from east and west, and sit down with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven." (Matthew 8:11)
The invited guests
The first guests were those who had already received God's promises, especially the leaders and people of Israel.
When the king sent servants to announce that everything was ready, they refused to come.
This reflects how many rejected Jesus even though the prophets had prepared them for His coming.
Jesus had already lamented:
"O Jerusalem, Jerusalem... How often I wanted to gather your children together... but you were not willing!" (Matthew 23:37)
The servants
The servants are God's messengers, including the prophets and later Jesus' disciples, who called people to repent and receive the Kingdom.
Some of the servants were mocked and killed, just as many prophets were rejected.
Jesus said:
"Nevertheless I must journey today, tomorrow, and the day following; for it cannot be that a prophet should perish outside of Jerusalem." (Luke 13:33)
The destruction of their city
Jesus says the king destroyed the murderers and burned their city.
This points to God's judgment, which many understand was fulfilled when Jerusalem was destroyed in AD 70 after its rejection of God's Messiah.
The invitation to everyone
After the first guests refused, the king told his servants:
"Go therefore into the highways, and as many as you find, invite to the wedding." (Matthew 22:9)
Now the invitation goes to everyone, both Jews and Gentiles, rich and poor, good and bad. God's invitation is open to all.
Jesus said:
"For many are called, but few are chosen." (Matthew 22:14)
He also said:
"Come to Me, all you who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest." (Matthew 11:28)
The wedding garment
This is the most important part of the parable.
One man accepted the invitation but entered without a wedding garment. He was removed from the feast.
The garment represents the changed life God requires of those who enter His Kingdom. It is not enough simply to accept the invitation with words.
Jesus consistently taught that true disciples obey Him.
"If you love Me, keep My commandments." (John 14:15)
"Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord,' shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven." (Matthew 7:21)
The garment symbolizes a life of repentance, faithfulness, and obedience to God. The man wanted the blessings of the kingdom without allowing God to change him.
Many are called, but few are chosen
This final statement summarizes the entire parable.
God's invitation goes out to many.
Not everyone accepts it.
Some reject it completely.
Others accept outwardly but do not truly follow Christ and wont do what he says.
Only those who respond with genuine faith and continue in His ways are found ready.
Jesus taught this repeatedly:
"If anyone desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow Me." (Luke 9:23)
"If you abide in My word, you are My disciples indeed." (John 8:31)
The Wedding Feast is about God's invitation into His Kingdom through His Son, Jesus Christ. Many who first received the invitation rejected it, so the invitation was extended to all people. But entering the Kingdom requires more than accepting an invitation. Those who come must be properly prepared by living in faithful obedience to God. As Jesus taught, "Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord,' shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven." (Matthew 7:21). The parable ends with the warning, "For many are called, but few are chosen."(Matthew 22:14). This shows that while God's invitation is offered widely, only those who truly respond to Him and remain faithful will share in the wedding feast of the Son.
Unfortunately many will be lost all those who proclaim Jesus name but wont do what he says will not make it. this is the great apostasy
So its unlearned to say from dust we came and to dust we go ? Its a fact that we all die.Unlearned rabbit trail question
easy;No its not. Scripture is written only to believers
Prove where Paul is urging cooperation with the Holy Spirit, in order not to revert back to the natural mind.
You have lied about me more than once. But your type of blindness and slander is not new.Wow - you come across as a very paranoid conspiracy theorist - and the only slander I see comes from you
Wow - you come across as a very paranoid conspiracy theorist - and the only slander I see comes from you
I agree with you but I am cautious to avoid leaving the wrong impression because some groups hold doctrines that teach "abundant life" that is not according to Jesus. I would defend the idea that walking with Jesus improves our attitudes and behaviors, but I don't defend the idea that Christ came to make my life better. He never promised me a good wife, or good and obedient children, a good school, a parking place, or what have you. Some people say that if you come to Christ, he will make your life better. When, in fact, he makes your life get worse at times.Yet Jesus said:
(Joh 6:47 NKJV) Most assuredly, I say to you, he who believes in Me has everlasting life.
Granted, we don't have it now in the fulness with which we shall have it in glory, when we shall see Him as He is.
The believer does have a warfare with the flesh, but they are never anymore the natural man of 1 Cir 2:14 because they have the Spirit, they are not or no longer in the flesh Rom 8:9This implies believers can resist or ignore the Spirit through sinful conduct and are called instead to live in a way that pleases Him.
Where can I read more about this please? I am interested as I am a son of these barbariansThey formed the European Nation and Scandinavian Nations, and since Europeans settled in the USA, Australia etc, you can say eventually those nations also. There is proof in both the Bible and also in Secular History. They were the barbarian tribes that destroyed the Roman Empire at the time - in a few places we have "Thou art my battle axe" in the Old Testament and the barbarians weapon of choice was the battle-axe - just an interesting note. It is to big a subject to go into here as this is a thread about Calvinism.
But do not limit Jesus in your life. Your life can get better when you are transformed into being more like Jesus. You become more ethical, smarter, and more loving. Your attitude becomes more positive and that can unlock many good things to come into your life.I agree with you but I am cautious to avoid leaving the wrong impression because some groups hold doctrines that teach "abundant life" that is not according to Jesus. I would defend the idea that walking with Jesus improves our attitudes and behaviors, but I don't defend the idea that Christ came to make my life better. He never promised me a good wife, or good and obedient children, a good school, a parking place, or what have you. Some people say that if you come to Christ, he will make your life better. When, in fact, he makes your life get worse at times.
I hear and understand your critique and normally I would agree with you, but my statements about how the passage reads is not the same thing as saying how it feels. These are not the same thing. The way a passage "reads" takes into account grammar, but also immediate and larger context.First off, saying a passage "doesn't read like" a certain doctrine, isn't an actual critique. That’s just a subjective feeling, not a real analysis of the text. We don't figure out biblical truth based on what a verse "feels like" to us—we look at what the words grammatically and literally say. When you swap out Paul's explicit terms for your own words, you're just forcing your own assumptions onto the text instead of letting it speak for itself.
Paul says unbelievers “walked” according to the course of this world and “followed” the prince of the power of the air. Those verbs matter. They are verbs of active participation, not coercion. Nothing in the passage suggests they lacked the capacity to seek God; rather, they were morally and spiritually inclined toward the deceiver because his fog suited their desires. They were not dragged; they were drawn. They were not chained; they were comfortable in the haze that hid the destructive nature of their path. Paul’s point is that their condition was hopeless without God’s intervention, not that they were metaphysically unable to respond. The deceiver leads by obscuring truth, flattering desires, and shaping a world‑system that feels natural to the sinner. In other words, they followed him because his lies aligned with what they wanted—not because they lacked the ability to choose differently.They aren't exercising free will; they are completely under the power of a spiritual master.
I don't need to show an idea from the text that he and his readers shared. Everyone knows that they have free will. Paul wouldn't need to say so if everyone already agreed on that. I understand your critique about using wording that Paul didn't use, but surely you realize that when someone explains a passage, they don't simply repeat the passage verbatim. I am forced to use different wording. The power of a passage isn't in the wording per se; it's in the ideas they convey. So if the words I chose didn't convey Paul's meaning then I stand corrected. And you shouldn't believe me. But if my wording conveys Paul's meaning then you should listen to what I say.To make your theory work, you had to use words Paul never used. He said 'dead", but you changed it to "misaligned." he said children of wrath, but you changed it to "misled." He said, "walking in trespasses", but you changed it to "walking in a haze." Show me the verse where Paul says they have the capacity to respond. Show me where Paul says they are just "misaligned." Show me where Paul says they are just "disabled" instead of dead. You won't be able to because that originates only from you, not Paul.
Well, that's my point exactly. In my view, the passage is not talking about a carcass. Apparently you disagree. This is why I turned our attention to what Paul says about life and living, which seems to stand as a comparison with his point about being dead in Christ. Being dead in sins seems to be the opposite of being alive in Christ. What is the main idea that ties them together?This is exactly why your bird analogy falls completely flat - Scripture isn't describing a healthy bird that's just refusing to fly; it's describing a carcass. A dead bird doesn't have a "will," an ability, or a capacity to respond to anything until and unless it is given life.
Yes, I am claiming that sinners are misled and walking in a haze, but if you recall, I also said that they walked according to the course of this world because the deceiver appealed to their desires. They wanted to be misled as crazy as that may seem. These are not people who were unable to believe; they are people who prefer not to believe. There is a difference.Third, your new argument completely shatters what you said before. You're trying to claim now that sinners are just "misled" and walking in a "haze" that blocks their vision. But in a prior reply, you explicitly stated that before rebirth, a person "simply could not perceive" spiritual reality and was in a state "where there is only spiritual deadness." By using the word "only," you ruled out any other possibility but deadness. You can't argue "only deadness" and then claim it's a "healthy bird with a stubborn will".
Again, we contrast and compare what Paul said about being dead with what he said about being alive, because it appears that Paul wants his readers to understand that framework.Lastly, when you interpret the scriptural text by what it seems to mean to you instead of what it explicitly states, you undermine what God is communicating through Paul—and by that, you completely invalidate any doctrinal conclusions you try to draw from it. From that, I think it's clear that when God uses the word "dead" in the spiritual sense, He means "dead" in the purest sense of the word. To say anything else just changes His clear intent based upon your subjective feelings, not Scripture.
I understand why we might consider that we have Eternal Life to a lesser degree now, but I wonder if that is really Biblical. Jesus talks about giving us abundant life now and I can see how that might be experienced in degrees, but I think we underestimate the kind of life that we will experience in the next age. It would be a worthy study to review all the places where Jesus compares this age with the coming age to see the differences. If Jesus teaches that we experience eternal life in degrees, I am okay with that. I believe whatever Jesus says. But sometimes we settle when we shouldn't.Eternal life is knowing God and Jesus...John 17:3. That it comes with greater degree and blessing in glory doesn't negate its reality in the here and now.