The apostasy must come first

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
51,342
10,713
113
2 Thessalonians 2:3a Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first,

Institutional Church Attendance Report: A Measure of Departure (1965–Present)


The Greek apostasia means "a standing away from" — a departure. Measured as weekly attendance at Mainline Protestant and Catholic churches, that departure is stark and sustained.

Catholic: Weekly Mass attendance stood at ~71% in 1965. It fell more than 20 points by the 1970s, then roughly four points per decade through the mid-1990s, stabilizing briefly mid-2000s (45% in 2005–2008). Decline resumed: 39% by 2014–2017. By CARA's stricter measure, weekly attendance was 24.4% pre-pandemic (2019) and remains near 24% today — a floor, not a recovery. Gallup's broader measure shows 45% weekly in the 2000s down to 33% now. Wikipedia + 5

Mainline Protestant: Membership (a proxy where attendance data is sparse) fell 2000–2020 across every major body: United Methodist -24%, ELCA -39%, Episcopal -32%, American Baptist -22%, UCC over -40%. Mainline share of all Protestants fell from 55% (1973) to 29% (2024). Only 45% raised Mainline still identify as adults — the weakest retention of any tradition. Substack + 2

Conclusion: Both bodies show the same shape — a mid-century peak, a first collapse (1965–1980s), a partial plateau, then renewed decline from the 2000s onward, with no institutional reversal comparable to the growth seen elsewhere. Whatever theological weight is assigned to "the falling away," the behavioral data — people literally standing away from the institutional gathering — has been continuous and structural for six decades, not a single event.

Apostasy as Rebellion: The Rejection of Biblical Inerrancy (1976–Present)

Apostasy also means rebellion — a doctrinal revolt, not just physical absence. Measured by belief in biblical inerrancy, that rebellion is documented and accelerating.

Individual belief (Gallup, tracked since 1976): From 1976–1984, an average of 38% of Americans called the Bible the literal, actual word of God (peaking at 40% in 1980 and 1984). By 2022, that figure had fallen to a record-low 20% — half its peak — while 29% now call the Bible mere human-authored "fables, legends, history and moral precepts," the first time in Gallup's near-50-year trend that skepticism has outnumbered literalism. The "inspired but not literal" middle view has stayed flat near 49% throughout — the collapse has moved literalists straight to outright rejection, not to a moderate middle. Gallup + 2

Institutional split: This is bimodal, not uniform. Mainline denominations (PCUSA, ELCA, UCC, Episcopal, Methodist) institutionally embrace higher criticism of scripture, formally treating the Bible as a fallible human product — the same bodies already shown collapsing in membership. The Southern Baptist Convention moved the opposite direction on purpose: its 2000 Baptist Faith and Message states Scripture has "God for its author... truth, without any mixture of error, for its matter," the fruit of a deliberate 1979–2000 internal takeover fought explicitly to reassert inerrancy against a moderating faction. SubstackGallup

Conclusion: The data shows two simultaneous, opposite responses to the same cultural pressure — one institutional wing formally abandoning inerrancy, one deliberately re-fortifying it — while the general population drifts steadily away from both toward outright rejection.
 
I do believe the word Departure is correct instead of rebellion or falling away but a physical departure and not a departure from the truth.
 
Physical departure?

Physical and spiritual are very related.

whatever comes out of our mouth is a reflection of our heart.

If one is physically away from God, then it will be hard to say he is spiritually near God.
 

Sexual abuse cases in Southern Baptist churches​


Widespread sexual abuse cases in Southern Baptist churches were reported by the Houston Chronicle and San Antonio Express-News on February 10, 2019. The report found roughly 380 clergy, lay leaders and volunteers had faced allegations of sexual misconduct, leaving behind over 700 victims since 1998. The extent of misconduct is further complicated by work within the Southern Baptist Convention to move sex offenders to other communities and resist attempts to address the culture of abuse.

Falling away indeed.

I left the Sunday Boxes to obey the Lord.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Komentaja
2 Thessalonians 2:3a Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first,

Institutional Church Attendance Report: A Measure of Departure (1965–Present)


The Greek apostasia means "a standing away from" — a departure. Measured as weekly attendance at Mainline Protestant and Catholic churches, that departure is stark and sustained.

Catholic: Weekly Mass attendance stood at ~71% in 1965. It fell more than 20 points by the 1970s, then roughly four points per decade through the mid-1990s, stabilizing briefly mid-2000s (45% in 2005–2008). Decline resumed: 39% by 2014–2017. By CARA's stricter measure, weekly attendance was 24.4% pre-pandemic (2019) and remains near 24% today — a floor, not a recovery. Gallup's broader measure shows 45% weekly in the 2000s down to 33% now. Wikipedia + 5

Mainline Protestant: Membership (a proxy where attendance data is sparse) fell 2000–2020 across every major body: United Methodist -24%, ELCA -39%, Episcopal -32%, American Baptist -22%, UCC over -40%. Mainline share of all Protestants fell from 55% (1973) to 29% (2024). Only 45% raised Mainline still identify as adults — the weakest retention of any tradition. Substack + 2

Conclusion: Both bodies show the same shape — a mid-century peak, a first collapse (1965–1980s), a partial plateau, then renewed decline from the 2000s onward, with no institutional reversal comparable to the growth seen elsewhere. Whatever theological weight is assigned to "the falling away," the behavioral data — people literally standing away from the institutional gathering — has been continuous and structural for six decades, not a single event.

Apostasy as Rebellion: The Rejection of Biblical Inerrancy (1976–Present)

Apostasy also means rebellion — a doctrinal revolt, not just physical absence. Measured by belief in biblical inerrancy, that rebellion is documented and accelerating.

Individual belief (Gallup, tracked since 1976): From 1976–1984, an average of 38% of Americans called the Bible the literal, actual word of God (peaking at 40% in 1980 and 1984). By 2022, that figure had fallen to a record-low 20% — half its peak — while 29% now call the Bible mere human-authored "fables, legends, history and moral precepts," the first time in Gallup's near-50-year trend that skepticism has outnumbered literalism. The "inspired but not literal" middle view has stayed flat near 49% throughout — the collapse has moved literalists straight to outright rejection, not to a moderate middle. Gallup + 2

Institutional split: This is bimodal, not uniform. Mainline denominations (PCUSA, ELCA, UCC, Episcopal, Methodist) institutionally embrace higher criticism of scripture, formally treating the Bible as a fallible human product — the same bodies already shown collapsing in membership. The Southern Baptist Convention moved the opposite direction on purpose: its 2000 Baptist Faith and Message states Scripture has "God for its author... truth, without any mixture of error, for its matter," the fruit of a deliberate 1979–2000 internal takeover fought explicitly to reassert inerrancy against a moderating faction. SubstackGallup

Conclusion: The data shows two simultaneous, opposite responses to the same cultural pressure — one institutional wing formally abandoning inerrancy, one deliberately re-fortifying it — while the general population drifts steadily away from both toward outright rejection.

Don't forget apostasy as heresy, most apparent as tulipism on CC, which contradicts the Gospel of God's love for sinful humanity and just judgment of those who ignore His condition for forgiveness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZNP

Sexual abuse cases in Southern Baptist churches​


Widespread sexual abuse cases in Southern Baptist churches were reported by the Houston Chronicle and San Antonio Express-News on February 10, 2019. The report found roughly 380 clergy, lay leaders and volunteers had faced allegations of sexual misconduct, leaving behind over 700 victims since 1998. The extent of misconduct is further complicated by work within the Southern Baptist Convention to move sex offenders to other communities and resist attempts to address the culture of abuse.

Falling away indeed.

I left the Sunday Boxes to obey the Lord.
Fair enough, if you were in a place where the Lord was leading you out of. But Hebrews tells us not to forsake the assembling of ourselves together and so much the more as you see the day approaching.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Churchgoer
Fair enough, if you were in a place where the Lord was leading you out of. But Hebrews tells us not to forsake the assembling of ourselves together and so much the more as you see the day approaching.
Exactly 💯,
Find a local church that follows biblical teaching.
Oh if find one church that is perfect condition, please don't go there, because ourselves can ruin that church.

Jesus never said our early assembly is perfect. Jesus just say do not stop gathering.
 
Fair enough, if you were in a place where the Lord was leading you out of. But Hebrews tells us not to forsake the assembling of ourselves together and so much the more as you see the day approaching.
Yeah, that's not what that means.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeIsHere
People who insist on church attendance often quote this scripture as the gold standard for proof of their assertion:

“And let us consider one another in order to stir up love and good works, 25 not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as is the manner of some, but exhorting one another, and so much the more as you see the Day approaching.”

This is Hebrews Chapter 10, verse 24
.

This is just another example of people quoting the scriptures out of context to suit their own needs or to assuage their own consciences.

Let’s look at the whole setting of the verse to first understand the context of the passage and secondly to ascertain the meaning of verse 24 within that setting.

We can begin earlier, but we’ll start at verse 16. The writer of Hebrews is making a fairly exhaustive comparison between the Old Covenant under Moses and the New Covenant under Christ. Throughout the book he juxtaposes the two in order to compare and contrast the tenets of each. The original covenant given to the Jews was the Law of which all were guilty of sin and deserved of God’s punishment. The new covenant was established in Christ, wherein all men receive the forgiveness of sins and may live with a clear conscience toward God as they are led by the Spirit of God. This is a simple explanation only, but it captures the gist of the differences between covenants.

Starting at verse 16 this is written:

16 “This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, says the Lord: I will put My laws into their hearts, and in their minds I will write them,” 17 then He adds, “Their sins and their lawless deeds I will remember no more.” 18 Now where there is remission of these, there is no longer an offering for sin.

It is very common for Judaizes to use this verse to say that the Law has simply moved from rock or stone onto men’s hearts but that the tenants and the requirements of the Law still remain. That’s foolish. It ignores the last part, and the deeper meaning of the change of covenant: “Their sins and their lawless deeds I will remember no more”.

Whereas the Law never forgot (a price always had to be paid for sin) the New Covenant released one from the debt of sin because there was One Who paid the debt for us: Jesus Christ. So this is a reference to the completely different nature of the New Covenant as compared to the old.

The writer of Hebrews expands upon this principle of the New Covenant next:

19 Therefore, brethren, having boldness to enter the Holiest by the blood of Jesus, 20 by a new and living way which He consecrated for us, through the veil, that is, His flesh, 21 and having a High Priest over the house of God, 22 let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water. 23 Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He who promised is faithful.

There it is. The sprinkling and washing references are references to liturgical consecration practices. The Jews would have been familiar with these. The grand difference is this: instead of sprinkling and washing the sacrifices for offering under the Law (Old Covenant) NOW those within the New Covenant are, themselves, washed and consecrated before God and presented as the offerings to Him. This is an exposition of all in Christ who are presented as living sacrifices to God. The standard of the New Covenant is that we are the offering to God to do with and to abide in as He pleases: Christ in us, the hope of glory.

So, this is the run-up to the golden standard verse that people use to compel others to group together in the Sunday boxes. It should be pretty clear by now that the setting of the verse is much more profound than simply attending a meeting. Herein, those within the New Covenant have moved from an existence of a Law that condemned based upon their inability to fulfill the mandates it to a Law now governed by the Lord’s ability to be faithful: “He who promised is faithful.”

So let’s read on…

24 And let us consider one another in order to stir up love and good works, 25 not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as is the manner of some, but exhorting one another, and so much the more as you see the Day approaching.

We should notice right away that the admonition to not forsake the assembling of ourselves is set against a certain Day. Those who use this verse to say it’s about Sunday meetings interpret it like this:

“Do not forsake coming together on Sundays as some people do. But the duty among the people of that order is to exhort, to encourage, to call people up, email them, text them exhorting one another all the more as you see Sunday coming.”

Hopefully by now that seems foolish. But let’s read on…

26 For if we sin willfully after we have received the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, 27 but a certain fearful expectation of judgment, and fiery indignation which will devour the adversaries. 28 Anyone who has rejected Moses’ law dies without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. 29 Of how much worse punishment, do you suppose, will he be thought worthy who has trampled the Son of God underfoot, counted the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified a common thing, and insulted the Spirit of grace? 30 For we know Him who said, “Vengeance is Mine, I will repay,” says the Lord. And again, “The Lord will judge His people.” 31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

I wonder how many “go to churchers!” tell others that to not attend Sunday meetings means that they should expect fiery indignation that devours adversaries. I mean, by all means be consistent! If you’re saying that verse 24 means “Go to church on Sundays” then you must carry it through to the consequence of staying home “You have trampled God underfoot and He will take vengeance on you!”.

How foolish. The Lord knows that empty men will use the scriptures to suit their own needs. What kind of correction awaits someone who uses the Word of God in that manner?
 
Now, let’s look at the meaning of verse 24.

24 And let us consider one another in order to stir up love and good works, 25 not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as is the manner of some, but exhorting one another, and so much the more as you see the Day approaching.

We should immediately notice that the writer of Hebrews needs a better editor. I mean why talk being together when that is implied in assembling? I mean, he could have simply turned-on Microsoft Grammar to flag redundancies. (Now who’s being stupid? 😊 ).

But no, he wrote: “..not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together…”.

The word for “gathering together” is episynagōgē. It is only used one other time in scripture.

Here it is in 2 Thessalonians starting in verse 1:


“1 Now, brethren, concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering together to Him, we ask you,

Ah. So the context is about being in Christ! If we examine the passage in Hebrews it make perfect sense. The writer was comparing and contrasting the Old and the New covenants. The character of the New Covenant is such so that we are ONE IN CHRIST!. Paul then writes to the saints in Thessaloniki admonishing them about this same principle.

But wait, there’s more! #Ronco

We’ve found The Day that is referenced in Hebrews! Here it is in Paul’s letter:

“2 not to be soon shaken in mind or troubled, either by spirit or by word or by letter, as if from us, as though the day of Christ had come. 3 Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition, 4 who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God.”

See, it’s the Day of Christ’s return. How simple. When we let the scriptures interpret the scriptures our questions are answered. The “Day” that is approaching in Hebrews 10:24 is the Return of the Lord. Not Sunday.

But, we are still left with a question: how are we to be gathered together? What should this look like and how can we partake in it.

I will be brief but succinct. The scriptures, again written by Paul, say this (Ephesians 3 into 4)

“Therefore I ask that you do not lose heart at my tribulations for you, which is your glory. (this is such an interesting scripture I wanted to include it. I don’t have time to unpack it but the implications are rich)

14 For this reason I bow my knees to the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, 15 from whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named, 16 that He would grant you, according to the riches of His glory, to be strengthened with might through His Spirit in the inner man, 17 that Christ may dwell in your hearts through faith; that you, being rooted and grounded in love, 18 may be able to comprehend with all the saints what is the width and length and depth and height— 19 to know the love of Christ which passes knowledge; that you may be filled with all the fullness of God.”

Paul is getting into our inclusion in Christ. To what end? Let’s continue…

1” I, therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you to walk worthy of the calling with which you were called, 2 with all lowliness and gentleness, with longsuffering, bearing with one another in love, 3 endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.

And to continue…

4 There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called in one hope of your calling; 5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism; 6 one God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.

This is the standard for the assembling of ourselves: that we may be one in Him. Let’s read on…

11 “And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers, 12 for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ, 13 till we all come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ; 14 that we should no longer be children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men, in the cunning craftiness of deceitful plotting, 15 but, speaking the truth in love, may grow up in all things into Him who is the head—Christ— 16 from whom the whole body, joined and knit together by what every joint supplies, according to the effective working by which every part does its share, causes growth of the body for the edifying of itself in love.”

This is the standard of our assembling of ourselves together: that we work in unison with one another as one body in Christ; being knit together by what every joint supplies, wherein every part does its share. This causes growth of the body as it lifts itself up in love. This is right there at the beginning of Hebrews 10:24:

“And let us consider one another in order to stir up love and good works…”

So, that’s all I have to say about that. Certainly this is not an exhaustive treatise of this topic but just an overview.

Blessings,
Aaron56
 
So, in conclusion. regarding the verse “And let us consider one another in order to stir up love and good works, 25 not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as is the manner of some, but exhorting one another, and so much the more as you see the Day approaching.”

When the Body of Christ in the same location gathers in separate buildings because of doctrinal differences they are all guilty of forsaking the assembly the Lord mandated. They claim, with their divisions, that the Body is divided. Their teachers are for their group. Their leadership is for their people, etc.

Don't believe me? Have one of the teachers in one box approach a leader in a different box and say "I have something for the people of God hear. I'd like to preach to them next Sunday". If they don't oppose you completely they will tell you why that is impossible. Such a reality does not exist in an "assembled Body" according to the scriptures.
 
So, in conclusion. regarding the verse “And let us consider one another in order to stir up love and good works, 25 not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as is the manner of some, but exhorting one another, and so much the more as you see the Day approaching.”

When the Body of Christ in the same location gathers in separate buildings because of doctrinal differences they are all guilty of forsaking the assembly the Lord mandated. They claim, with their divisions, that the Body is divided. Their teachers are for their group. Their leadership is for their people, etc.

Don't believe me? Have one of the teachers in one box approach a leader in a different box and say "I have something for the people of God hear. I'd like to preach to them next Sunday". If they don't oppose you completely they will tell you why that is impossible. Such a reality does not exist in an "assembled Body" according to the scriptures.
So the conclusion is not going to any local church?
Just internet warriors?
 
People who insist on church attendance often quote this scripture as the gold standard for proof of their assertion:

“And let us consider one another in order to stir up love and good works, 25 not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as is the manner of some, but exhorting one another, and so much the more as you see the Day approaching.”

This is Hebrews Chapter 10, verse 24
.

This is just another example of people quoting the scriptures out of context to suit their own needs or to assuage their own consciences.

Let’s look at the whole setting of the verse to first understand the context of the passage and secondly to ascertain the meaning of verse 24 within that setting.

We can begin earlier, but we’ll start at verse 16. The writer of Hebrews is making a fairly exhaustive comparison between the Old Covenant under Moses and the New Covenant under Christ. Throughout the book he juxtaposes the two in order to compare and contrast the tenets of each. The original covenant given to the Jews was the Law of which all were guilty of sin and deserved of God’s punishment. The new covenant was established in Christ, wherein all men receive the forgiveness of sins and may live with a clear conscience toward God as they are led by the Spirit of God. This is a simple explanation only, but it captures the gist of the differences between covenants.

Starting at verse 16 this is written:

16 “This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, says the Lord: I will put My laws into their hearts, and in their minds I will write them,” 17 then He adds, “Their sins and their lawless deeds I will remember no more.” 18 Now where there is remission of these, there is no longer an offering for sin.

It is very common for Judaizes to use this verse to say that the Law has simply moved from rock or stone onto men’s hearts but that the tenants and the requirements of the Law still remain. That’s foolish. It ignores the last part, and the deeper meaning of the change of covenant: “Their sins and their lawless deeds I will remember no more”.

Whereas the Law never forgot (a price always had to be paid for sin) the New Covenant released one from the debt of sin because there was One Who paid the debt for us: Jesus Christ. So this is a reference to the completely different nature of the New Covenant as compared to the old.

The writer of Hebrews expands upon this principle of the New Covenant next:

19 Therefore, brethren, having boldness to enter the Holiest by the blood of Jesus, 20 by a new and living way which He consecrated for us, through the veil, that is, His flesh, 21 and having a High Priest over the house of God, 22 let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water. 23 Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He who promised is faithful.

There it is. The sprinkling and washing references are references to liturgical consecration practices. The Jews would have been familiar with these. The grand difference is this: instead of sprinkling and washing the sacrifices for offering under the Law (Old Covenant) NOW those within the New Covenant are, themselves, washed and consecrated before God and presented as the offerings to Him. This is an exposition of all in Christ who are presented as living sacrifices to God. The standard of the New Covenant is that we are the offering to God to do with and to abide in as He pleases: Christ in us, the hope of glory.

So, this is the run-up to the golden standard verse that people use to compel others to group together in the Sunday boxes. It should be pretty clear by now that the setting of the verse is much more profound than simply attending a meeting. Herein, those within the New Covenant have moved from an existence of a Law that condemned based upon their inability to fulfill the mandates it to a Law now governed by the Lord’s ability to be faithful: “He who promised is faithful.”

So let’s read on…

24 And let us consider one another in order to stir up love and good works, 25 not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as is the manner of some, but exhorting one another, and so much the more as you see the Day approaching.

We should notice right away that the admonition to not forsake the assembling of ourselves is set against a certain Day. Those who use this verse to say it’s about Sunday meetings interpret it like this:

“Do not forsake coming together on Sundays as some people do. But the duty among the people of that order is to exhort, to encourage, to call people up, email them, text them exhorting one another all the more as you see Sunday coming.”

Hopefully by now that seems foolish. But let’s read on…

26 For if we sin willfully after we have received the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, 27 but a certain fearful expectation of judgment, and fiery indignation which will devour the adversaries. 28 Anyone who has rejected Moses’ law dies without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. 29 Of how much worse punishment, do you suppose, will he be thought worthy who has trampled the Son of God underfoot, counted the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified a common thing, and insulted the Spirit of grace? 30 For we know Him who said, “Vengeance is Mine, I will repay,” says the Lord. And again, “The Lord will judge His people.” 31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

I wonder how many “go to churchers!” tell others that to not attend Sunday meetings means that they should expect fiery indignation that devours adversaries. I mean, by all means be consistent! If you’re saying that verse 24 means “Go to church on Sundays” then you must carry it through to the consequence of staying home “You have trampled God underfoot and He will take vengeance on you!”.

How foolish. The Lord knows that empty men will use the scriptures to suit their own needs. What kind of correction awaits someone who uses the Word of God in that manner?
I did not say anything about the Lord's day morning, you added that. I simply said we need to gather together. The church is "the gathering" it is not a building. 1 Corinthians 14 is an entire chapter on what we should do when we gather together and it is very clear about the day: "whenever you come together".

Likewise the chapters about keeping the Lord's table say pretty much the same thing. The New Testament describes a corporate worship, that could be as few as three people, but that is a key part of the Christian life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Churchgoer
So, in conclusion. regarding the verse “And let us consider one another in order to stir up love and good works, 25 not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as is the manner of some, but exhorting one another, and so much the more as you see the Day approaching.”

When the Body of Christ in the same location gathers in separate buildings because of doctrinal differences they are all guilty of forsaking the assembly the Lord mandated. They claim, with their divisions, that the Body is divided. Their teachers are for their group. Their leadership is for their people, etc.

Don't believe me? Have one of the teachers in one box approach a leader in a different box and say "I have something for the people of God hear. I'd like to preach to them next Sunday". If they don't oppose you completely they will tell you why that is impossible. Such a reality does not exist in an "assembled Body" according to the scriptures.
I do that all the time. I am a Gideon, there are over 40 churches in our city that we are in contact with and go and speak in the church concerning our ministry.

I personally have met with people from several hundred congregations and more likely over a thousand. So based on your experience how many congregations have you actually met with?

Every week we gather for prayer and in my prayer group we represent at least 8 different congregations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Churchgoer
So the conclusion is not going to any local church?
Just internet warriors?
First of all, you cannot "go to" what you ARE. "Church" is a misnomer applied to a building because of a Germanic tradition.

Secondly, a believer should assemble with other believers in their area being careful not to foment divisions among the Body of Christ.
 
I do that all the time. I am a Gideon, there are over 40 churches in our city that we are in contact with and go and speak in the church concerning our ministry.

I personally have met with people from several hundred congregations and more likely over a thousand. So based on your experience how many congregations have you actually met with?

Every week we gather for prayer and in my prayer group we represent at least 8 different congregations.
I am into focus on 1 local church, commitment. But I know many nearby churches teach similar doctrine. So this coming Sunday will visit one church, since mine is away and I can't go away.
In the past we also have office Bible study, meet in person, that is kind of multiple denomination, such as Baptist and pentecostal together. , which is fine too, we focus on the core that we agree.
 
I do that all the time. I am a Gideon, there are over 40 churches in our city that we are in contact with and go and speak in the church concerning our ministry.

I personally have met with people from several hundred congregations and more likely over a thousand. So based on your experience how many congregations have you actually met with?

Every week we gather for prayer and in my prayer group we represent at least 8 different congregations.

How many women are voting members of The Gideons?