Did anyone see President Trump's speech the other day? Some Networks refused to air it

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Do you agree with the Networks decision not to air Trumps latest speech?

  • Other - please elaborate on your opinion on the matter

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    10

Bible_Locket

Well-known member
Jul 3, 2026
2,368
2,145
113
youtube.com

Karoline Leavitt calls on CBS amid reports Donald Trump's speech will be snubbed by network TV​



And in other news: 🤦



It's not really a conspiracy theory when stuff like this happens as a matter of fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HealthAndHappiness
The media should cover actual news but not political propaganda. ABC, CBS and NBC all declined to cover a Biden speech in 2022 because it was considered to be too political. The great orange one isn't special; either we have a free press or we don't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aussie52
Gemini AI

Is Trump trying to stop mail in voting?

Answer=
Yes, Donald Trump is actively trying to implement significant restrictions on mail-in voting. While he has historically urged his base to use mail-in voting as a tactical tool to win elections, his official policy platform and recent executive actions aim to scale back, heavily regulate, or entirely eliminate the practice for the general public.


His current efforts operate across a few key fronts:


1. Executive Action via the U.S. Postal Service


In March 2026, Trump issued a sweeping executive order titled "Ensuring Citizen Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections". This order attempts to use the federal government to bypass state election laws by introducing the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) as a centralized gatekeeper for mail ballots.


Under the policy:


Federal "Approved Lists": The Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration were ordered to build a centralized list of verified adult citizens.


Ballot Delivery Gatekeeping: The USPS proposed new rules stating it would refuse to deliver or accept mail-in ballots unless the voter was on a pre-approved, state-provided eligibility list cross-referenced by the federal government.


The Legal Pushback: Federal judges blocked major pillars of this executive order, ruling that the President does not have the constitutional authority to regulate state-run elections and that Congress has never granted the USPS the right to control or withhold mail-in voting. The Trump administration is currently appealing these decisions to get the restrictions in place before the 2026 midterms.


2. Pushing for "Excuse-Only" Mail-In Voting


Publicly, Trump has repeatedly called mail-in ballots "inherently corrupt" and stated that they should be virtually eliminated. His stated goal is to limit mail-in or absentee voting strictly to individuals who meet specific criteria:


Severe illness


Physical disability


Active military deployment


Documented out-of-state business travel or vacation


He is pushing Congress to back the SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act) and similar legislative packages to codify tighter identification and submission requirements for any mail-in or mail-registered ballots.


3. The Political Rhetoric vs. Practice Paradox


Interestingly, Trump’s messaging creates a bit of a double standard. While he campaigns heavily on the idea that mail-in voting is deeply flawed and needs to be stopped, he explicitly tells his supporters to use it so Republicans don't lose early-voting advantages to Democrats. Furthermore, Trump himself frequently utilizes mail-in or absentee voting to cast his own ballots in Florida elections when he is traveling.


In short, Trump is not just talking about stopping widespread mail-in voting; his administration is actively using federal agency rules and the court system to try and put strict boundaries around it.
 
Gemini AI

Is Trump trying to stop mail in voting?

Answer=
Yes, Donald Trump is actively trying to implement significant restrictions on mail-in voting. While he has historically urged his base to use mail-in voting as a tactical tool to win elections, his official policy platform and recent executive actions aim to scale back, heavily regulate, or entirely eliminate the practice for the general public.


His current efforts operate across a few key fronts:


1. Executive Action via the U.S. Postal Service


In March 2026, Trump issued a sweeping executive order titled "Ensuring Citizen Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections". This order attempts to use the federal government to bypass state election laws by introducing the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) as a centralized gatekeeper for mail ballots.


Under the policy:


Federal "Approved Lists": The Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration were ordered to build a centralized list of verified adult citizens.


Ballot Delivery Gatekeeping: The USPS proposed new rules stating it would refuse to deliver or accept mail-in ballots unless the voter was on a pre-approved, state-provided eligibility list cross-referenced by the federal government.


The Legal Pushback: Federal judges blocked major pillars of this executive order, ruling that the President does not have the constitutional authority to regulate state-run elections and that Congress has never granted the USPS the right to control or withhold mail-in voting. The Trump administration is currently appealing these decisions to get the restrictions in place before the 2026 midterms.


2. Pushing for "Excuse-Only" Mail-In Voting


Publicly, Trump has repeatedly called mail-in ballots "inherently corrupt" and stated that they should be virtually eliminated. His stated goal is to limit mail-in or absentee voting strictly to individuals who meet specific criteria:


Severe illness


Physical disability


Active military deployment


Documented out-of-state business travel or vacation


He is pushing Congress to back the SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act) and similar legislative packages to codify tighter identification and submission requirements for any mail-in or mail-registered ballots.


3. The Political Rhetoric vs. Practice Paradox


Interestingly, Trump’s messaging creates a bit of a double standard. While he campaigns heavily on the idea that mail-in voting is deeply flawed and needs to be stopped, he explicitly tells his supporters to use it so Republicans don't lose early-voting advantages to Democrats. Furthermore, Trump himself frequently utilizes mail-in or absentee voting to cast his own ballots in Florida elections when he is traveling.


In short, Trump is not just talking about stopping widespread mail-in voting; his administration is actively using federal agency rules and the court system to try and put strict boundaries around it.
Are you against voter integrity?

How would you safeguard voter integrity?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bible_Locket
Are you against voter integrity?

How would you safeguard voter integrity?
Since Gemini was brought into this thread I thought to utilize Google AI.

Question:
Is president Trump's mail in ballot effort intended to insure election integrity?


Whether President Trump's mail-in ballot efforts are intended to ensure election integrity is a subject of intense debate, with the administration and its critics holding fundamentally opposing views.
The debate centers on a March 31, 2026 Executive Order titled "Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections," alongside the administration's broader push for the SAVE America Act.

The Administration's Stance: Protecting the Vote
The Trump administration states that its actions are necessary to prevent fraud, verify citizenship, and restore public trust in the election system. According to the White House Fact Sheet and official statements:
  • Citizenship Verification: The order directs the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Social Security Administration to compile federal lists of confirmed U.S. citizens to ensure non-citizens cannot cast ballots.
  • Auditable Tracking: The administration advocates for mandatory unique identifiers, like bar codes on ballot envelopes, to trace mail-in ballots reliably.
  • Federal Oversight: The White House argues the federal government has an "unavoidable duty" under Article II of the Constitution to maintain confidence in federal election outcomes and enforce criminal law.

Critics' Stance: Voter Suppression and Unconstitutional Overreach
Voting rights organizations, legal scholars, and Democratic leaders argue that these measures are unlawful attempts to restrict mail-in voting and suppress eligible voters. Groups like the ACLU and the Brennan Center for Justice counter with the following points:
  • Infringing on State Authority: The U.S. Constitution grants individual states the primary authority to manage elections. Critics argue the order illegally attempts to transfer this power to federal agencies.
  • Restricting Access: The order instructs the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) to deliver mail-in ballots only to voters featured on a federally approved list. Critics state this threatens the voting rights of military members, overseas citizens, the elderly, and disabled voters who rely heavily on mail voting.
  • Lack of Evidence: Fact-checkers and independent research groups emphasize that multiple studies show widespread mail-in ballot fraud is virtually non-existent, making these heavy restrictions unnecessary.

Current Legal Status
The administration's efforts have faced immediate legal challenges. In late June 2026, federal judges blocked key portions of the executive order, ruling that the administration overstepped its bounds by trying to dictate state ballot procedures and use the independent USPS to filter state voter rolls. The Trump administration has appealed these rulings.

 
Are you against voter integrity?

How would you safeguard voter integrity?
I don’t really know,but Trump’s messaging creates a bit of a double standard.

While he campaigns heavily on the idea that mail-in voting is deeply flawed and needs to be stopped, he

explicitly tells his supporters to use it so Republicans don't lose early-voting advantages to Democrats.

Furthermore,

Trump himself frequently utilizes mail-in or absentee voting to cast his own ballots in Florida elections when he is traveling.
 
I don’t really know,but Trump’s messaging creates a bit of a double standard.

While he campaigns heavily on the idea that mail-in voting is deeply flawed and needs to be stopped, he

explicitly tells his supporters to use it so Republicans don't lose early-voting advantages to Democrats.

Furthermore,

Trump himself frequently utilizes mail-in or absentee voting to cast his own ballots in Florida elections when he is traveling.
You don't know whether you believe in voter integrity?

Do you believe mail-in ballots are more or less secure than in-person voting?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bible_Locket
Gemini AI
Is mail-in voting secure

Yes, mail-in voting is secure. Nonpartisan election experts, security agencies, and numerous academic studies have consistently found that voting by mail is a safe and reliable system with multiple overlapping safeguards. While the phrase "voter fraud" frequently appears in political debates, actual documented cases of mail ballot fraud are incredibly rare.


State and local election offices use a variety of strict measures to ensure that every mail-in ballot is legitimate and safely counted.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: LoProfile
Gemini AI
Is mail-in voting secure

Yes, mail-in voting is secure. Nonpartisan election experts, security agencies, and numerous academic studies have consistently found that voting by mail is a safe and reliable system with multiple overlapping safeguards. While the phrase "voter fraud" frequently appears in political debates, actual documented cases of mail ballot fraud are incredibly rare.


State and local election offices use a variety of strict measures to ensure that every mail-in ballot is legitimate and safely counted.
What measures do they use?
 
Trump uses mail-in voting,is he honest?šŸ˜µā€šŸ’«šŸ¤£

do you not think it is strange that in usually democrat areas, it takes weeks after election day to count all the votes?

and most of the mail in ballots are for democrats?

is that not strange?
 
Because they are difficult to secure. There are multiple ballots, ballot harvesting, and chain of custody issues.
1. The "Multiple Ballots" Concern


The fear here is that if a state mails a ballot to every registered voter, thousands of ballots will sit in apartment lobbies, get sent to old addresses, or allow people to vote multiple times.


The Reality of the Safeguard: A ballot is not like a flyer; it cannot simply be picked up by anyone and counted. Every single ballot package sent out is tied to a specific voter’s record via a unique tracking barcode.


If a ballot is sent to a voter's old address and a new tenant fills it out, it will be rejected the moment it reaches the election office because the signature on the envelope will not match the voter’s signature on file.


If a voter receives a mail ballot but decides to vote in person instead, the electronic pollbook at the voting center updates instantly. If they try to mail the ballot later, the system flags the barcode as "already voted" and rejects it automatically.


2. "Ballot Harvesting" (Third-Party Collection)


This refers to the practice where a third party—such as a volunteer, campaign staffer, or community member—collects completed mail-in ballots from voters and drops them off at an election office or drop box. Critics argue this opens the door for bad actors to pressure voters, alter votes, or simply throw away ballots from neighborhoods that vote for the opposing party.


The Reality of the Safeguard: States have heavily regulated or restricted this practice to prevent abuse. As of 2026, the law varies significantly depending on the state:


Strict Limits: Many states explicitly outlaw anyone other than a close family member or caregiver from returning a ballot.


Caps on Collection: In states where third-party collection is legal, laws often limit a single person to collecting only a small number of ballots (usually between 3 and 10).


Paper Trails: Collectors are often required to sign a log or affidavit on the ballot envelope, making them legally responsible for the ballot's safe delivery.


The Ultimate Check: Even if an unauthorized person collects a ballot, they cannot change the vote inside because the envelope must be sealed and signed by the actual voter. If the envelope is ripped open or tampered with, it is flagged and investigated.


3. Chain of Custody Issues


The concern is that once a ballot leaves a voter's hands, it passes through too many intermediate steps (mail trucks, sorting facilities, drop boxes) where it could be stolen or lost.


The Reality of the Safeguard: Election offices treat ballots with a level of security similar to how banks handle cash or police handle evidence. The "chain of custody" is a strict, legally mandated paper trail.


Tamper-Evident Tech: Ballots are transported in heavy-duty containers secured with serially numbered, single-use, tamper-evident seals. The seal numbers are logged before transit and verified upon arrival; if a seal number doesn't match or looks broken, the container is locked down and investigated.


Bipartisan Teams: By law, local drop boxes are emptied by teams of at least two people, almost always representing different political parties, ensuring one person is never left alone with the ballots.


24/7 Logging: Every single exchange—who touched the box, what time it was opened, how many ballots were inside—is documented on a physical seal log.


While managing millions of pieces of mail is undeniably complex, the security doesn't rely on trust. It relies on a rigorous, transparent system of audits, barcodes, and bipartisan oversight specifically designed to catch human errors and deter bad actors.
 
do you not think it is strange that in usually democrat areas, it takes weeks after election day to count all the votes?

and most of the mail in ballots are for democrats?

is that not strange?
The truth is the truth,Trump doesn’t want you using them so you don’t use them.That’s simple to understand and not strange IMO.