911 Road to Tyranny, What Did You Learn?

[ZNP]

What do you know of building #7?

After the first two buildings fell it was out of sympathy that Building 7 decided it also could no longer stand and so 8 hours later it could no longer keep from collapsing proving once and for all that buildings have feelings and can experience grief. Of course that is just the official theory, the other theory of course is that it was used in the control demolition of the twin towers and to destroy evidence they destroyed that building as well., but that is a tin foil hat conspiracy theory of a bunch of engineers and architects.

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

After the first two buildings fell it was out of sympathy that Building 7 decided it also could no longer stand and so 8 hours later it could no longer keep from collapsing proving once and for all that buildings have feelings and can experience grief. Of course that is just the official theory, the other theory of course is that it was used in the control demolition of the twin towers and to destroy evidence they destroyed that building as well., but that is a tin foil hat conspiracy theory of a bunch of engineers and architects.

Since that occurred, I worry every time I turn on the flame to boil water on the stove. Meta-physics proved that it doesn't take much of a fire to melt through a stainless steel sheet metal container and the burner it sets on. I don't know why anyone risks using a wood stove! It's a crazy risk!

 

[GaryA]

Building 7 isn't explained in the report?

This seems to suggest that you trust the government report without [even] knowing what is in it...???

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

This seems to suggest that you trust the government report without [even] knowing what is in it...???

Definitely a controlled demolition on all 3 .
Who had motives and opportunity? I don't think it was Bin laden.

@NightTwister ,
I like what Roger Waters said, "If one was a controlled demolition, all were controlled demolition. "

 

[NightTwister]

That is true, the evidence was the steel and they destroyed that evidence and refused to let the investigators examine it.

Destroyed the evidence? That makes no sense.

 

[NightTwister]

This seems to suggest that you trust the government report without [even] knowing what is in it...???

I asked a question. Was it not in the report?

 

[NightTwister]

What do you know of building #7?

I asked you first.

 

[ZNP]

Destroyed the evidence? That makes no sense.

If this was done in a controlled demolition using Thermite it would have been easy to prove from the steel. However, the steel was held by the military, the forensic investigators were not allowed to look at it, and then it was shipped to China to be melted down, destroying evidence. So the same people who claim the "conspiracy theorists" have no evidence, are the same ones who destroyed the evidence and prevented forensic scientists from examining the evidence.

 

[NightTwister]

What do you know of building #7?

The NIST report is considered authoritative for Building 7, which concluded it was fire, not explosives that destroyed it. But you know that. Your response was an attempt to change the subject.

That has nothing to do with my reply, which was about the Congressional report which covered only the two towers, which were also destroyed by fire and subsequent collapse, just as the report confirms.

The attack was carefully planned by Muslim terrorists who tried to kill my father-in-law. These conspiracy theories without factual foundation are an attempt to deflect blame from where it rightfully belongs.

 

[NightTwister]

Definitely a controlled demolition on all 3 .
Who had motives and opportunity? I don't think it was Bin laden.

@NightTwister ,
I like what Roger Waters said, "If one was a controlled demolition, all were controlled demolition. "

And yet none were, just like the reports confirmed, despite what "Roger" claims.

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

And yet none were, just like the reports confirmed, despite what "Roger" claims.

The owner of the third building slipped and admitted it on public broadcasting TV live. I'd give you the video, but you don't watch videos.

It takes months of planning and work to pull a large building down in it's own footprint.
It was set up for destruction the same day the area was blocked off for demolition. That wasn't the result of some silly office fire.

 

[NightTwister]

The owner of the third building slipped and admitted it on public broadcasting TV live. I'd give you the video, but you don't watch videos.

It takes months of planning and work to pull a large building down in it's own footprint.
It was set up for destruction the same day the area was blocked off for demolition. That wasn't the result of some silly office fire.

You clearly don't understand building construction. I do. I was in the industry for 25 years. I know how these building were constructed, and under these conditions, vertical collapse would've been expected.

 

[ZNP]

The NIST report is considered authoritative for Building 7, which concluded it was fire, not explosives that destroyed it. But you know that. Your response was an attempt to change the subject.

That has nothing to do with my reply, which was about the Congressional report which covered only the two towers, which were also destroyed by fire and subsequent collapse, just as the report confirms.

The attack was carefully planned by Muslim terrorists who tried to kill my father-in-law. These conspiracy theories without factual foundation are an attempt to deflect blame from where it rightfully belongs.

So the people who had complete control of the evidence, guarded it with the military, refused the investigators to have access to investigate it and then destroyed the evidence get to also be the ones who author the "official report". No. You obviously do not understand the forensic investigation of a crime, I do.

 

[NightTwister]

So the people who had complete control of the evidence, guarded it with the military, refused the investigators to have access to investigate it and then destroyed the evidence get to also be the ones who author the "official report". No.

Muslims hate Jews and Christians and will never stop doing everything they can to eliminate us from the earth. You can apologize for them. I won't.

 

[ZNP]

Muslims hate Jews and Christians and will never stop doing everything they can to eliminate us from the earth. You can apologize for them. I won't.

Liars will lie and will never stop doing everything they can to deceive. You can choose to ignore that, I won't.

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

You clearly don't understand building construction. I do. I was in the industry for 25 years. I know how these building were constructed, and under these conditions, vertical collapse would've been expected.

Of course and that's why I worry so much when I put a heavy pot of stew on the stove. Since those gas flames put out more heat than office materials, one of these days it's going to end up on the floor.

The new technique isn't the compound found in the molten beams cut cleanly in each building. Isn't the new technique demolition companies now use is setting office chairs and a couple remes of paper randomly to pull those big buildings.
I think Engineers For 911 proves the new physics.

Tell me how they do it today on those skyscrapers.

 

[NightTwister]

Liars will lie and will never stop doing everything they can to deceive. You can choose to ignore that, I won't.

I don't and won't.

 

[NightTwister]

Of course and that's why I worry so much when I put a heavy pot of stew on the stove. Since those gas flames put out more heat than office materials, one of these days it's going to end up on the floor.

The new technique isn't the compound found in the molten beams cut cleanly in each building. The new technique is setting office chairs and a couple remes of paper randomly to pull those big buildings.
I think Engineers For 911 proves the new physics.

Beams and columns don't need to be molten to fail. Clearly you understand nothing of physics or engineering. Nothing I say will change your mind. Believe what you will.

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

Beams and columns don't need to be molten to fail. Clearly you understand nothing of physics or engineering. Nothing I say will change your mind. Believe what you will.

I guess you haven't had a chance to read the information on the beams that some collected for memorial museums before all the steel was all shipped to China.
I've looked at it but am not an expert in that area.
Since that's your field, you'll find it especially interesting.

There are a lot of Architects and Structural Engineers who have examined evidence, written and taught on the subject.
This is one of the organizations.

Who We Are – Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

www.ae911truth.org

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

Beams and columns don't need to be molten to fail. Clearly you understand nothing of physics or engineering. Nothing I say will change your mind. Believe what you will.

There are plenty of photos that show angled shear cuts with a compound from the only US military contractor that has it in the world. I say molten because it cuts using intense heat. If I understand correctly the cuts became molten for a second to allow freefall without resistance.

Part 5: How Skyscrapers Are Really Imploded

A 'normal office fire' cannot cause a fireproofed steel frame to 'vanish' in an instant. Incendiaries and explosives can. Symmetrically razing a steel-framed skyscraper in mere seconds, though, requires such extraordinary demolition skills that only a handful companies in the world will even...

www.ae911truth.org