I think anyone who looks very carefully at the story about all of the various people in positions of authority whose job was to make sure this didn't happen would have a vested interest in arguing that the official narrative is correct because it saves them from shame and ignominy. Yes, some were likely paid to look the other way or in some other way compromised, but many might have simply been incompetent and so they don't want to know the truth because it simply exposes them as incompetent.
Maybe watch the demolition of casinos. Tall buildings.
Sadam Husein was revenge. For when he tried to assassinate Bush41 years prior.
I didn't know this.
A director or when they inserted him in political office?Yes, I remember.
Asbestos removal
Witnesses saw men in uniform attaching the devices and reported that.
I read that Silverstein took out an exorbitantly high payout policy for the extremely rare event of destruction from terrorism just prior. Since we didn't hear of any insurance claim investigation or dispute, my second guess is that it seems like he must've had controlling stock in the insurance company. I may be wrong because the only other reasonable explanation is that he offered a percentage of the claim payout to the CEO to control the details.
It was between April 14 and 16, 1993, while President Bush 41 was visiting Kuwait.I didn't know this.
Was that while he was the C
Not many found that odd.
True. I think some prefer the Ostrich posture,head in the sand,because the reality is too much to bear.
Did you see the news reporting on the next day, airport security CCTV captured images of the terrorist hijackers,who trained to fly her in America, walking through the airports they departed from prior to the hijackings?
I remember.
Same here.
www.nytimes.com
www.forbes.com
Billions were on the line. There was investigations.
www.sgh.com
I watched it happen on live TV. Then went into a bit of a funk because some channels kept reporting the event 24/7. In our market you couldn't get away from it. Because we were in that NY broadcasting market.
When you see it happen and know people who work in Manhattan,but not the Towers,thank God, for me it became personal.
Will read that. I'm surprised more media didn't cover this .It was between April 14 and 16, 1993, while President Bush 41 was visiting Kuwait.
Not many found that odd.
True. I think some prefer the Ostrich posture,head in the sand,because the reality is too much to bear.
Did you see the news reporting on the next day, airport security CCTV captured images of the terrorist hijackers,who trained to fly her in America, walking through the airports they departed from prior to the hijackings?
These guys were Jello in the buildings debris,allegedly, and next day,of all people walking in airports,CCTV found them?
I remember.
Same here.
A DAY OF TERROR: THE INSURERS; Reinsurance Companies Wait to Sort Out Cost of Damages (Published 2001)
Attacks on twin towers of World Trade Center could cost insurers more than $5 billion, making terrorist attack most costly man-made catastrophe ever; dozens of insurers are expected to bear cost of damage, including cost of towers as well as damage to surrounding area and cost of office...
"Insurance companies paid Silverstein Properties and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey a total of $4.55 billion to settle the property damage and business interruption claims for the World Trade Center complex."
Larry Silverstein
Larry Silverstein is #3332 on Forbes' 2026 Billionaires list. Read more about Larry Silverstein, their experience, their asset summary, and more here.
At 95 I don't think he will be smiling where he will be before long.
Billions were on the line. There was investigations.
Global Analysis of World Trade Center Towers
I watched it happen on live TV. Then went into a bit of a funk because some channels kept reporting the event 24/7. In our market you couldn't get away from it. Because we were in that NY broadcasting market.
Plus,I have family in Federal agencies. Nuff said about that one.
When you see it happen and know people who work in Manhattan,but not the Towers,thank God, for me it became personal.
I use to say I knew every person who died that day.
Because they were fellow Americans murdered by Evil.
That sentiment hasn't changed.
It is not that different from initiation into the Mob or a street gang where you have to kill someone. Principle of M.A.D., if you rat them out they will rat you out.
It is also about holding something over your head to prevent you from ratting them out. This is why the Bible says "with You there is forgiveness that you might be feared". We realize we have to cut deals with Criminals to make it easier for them to become cooperating witnesses.
I think the exposure of the "humiliation rituals" also touches on the religious/spiritual grounds of this cult (which they don't want exposed). Things are easier to explain when the masses think it's just about bribery and personal profit. Much harder to explain when there's Satanic rituals and torture and eating children. The Canaanites in the bible weren't just greedy. God had them exterminated for being exceptionally wicked - in many ways similar to the cult gradually being exposed now.
Thanks for explaining that in your last paragraph. I agree that there were many levels and objectives the Devil accomplished through that false flag event. Just one is the multitude of privacy and 4th Amendment violations we see in computer/phone usage, the new cameras everywhere and the legally protected infrastructure that is used against every human being right now. I will never quote GW Bush's blasphemous quote, but he disregarded the Bill of rights and constitution as did the vast majority of CONgress and the supreme court back when the "Patriot" Act was passed and war gleefully started. I wrote my Senator and got a personal response from the late Robert Byrd. Ron Paul was the other dissenter who voted against it.
