It's divisive programming.
The, Us vs. Them model.
Imagine the difference if the United States of America also boasted a united citizenry in America.
Fauci 2.0? Aborted Fetal Tissue Research. Sandwich? Fauci takes the fifth.
- Thread starter Lightbeamrider
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
The, Us vs. Them model.
Imagine the difference if the United States of America also boasted a united citizenry in America.
Not everyone though. Some of us may be thinking along the lines that it was Trump along with the others who added the immunity over law suits to the Covid vax. And it makes about as much sense for Rand Paul to say out of one side of his mouth Faucci and China let a virus that was being weaponized out and then suggest no one wear mask,hazmat suits ect to avoid catching this weaponized super biological weapon gone loose in the world out of the other side of his mouth at the same time. If Rand Paul actually believed this was what he was saying,(a biological gain of function bio-weapon that leaked out of a lab) any one who thinks rational would suggest avoid catching it at all cost but R.Paul advocates not doing any of those things to a point where a four year old should be able to see through the Rand Paul joke.
| Another aspect CAM NEWTON DROPS A COVID-ERA BOMBSHELL Former NFL star Cam Newton says it’s time to admit what was allegedly happening behind the scenes during the pandemic. Newton claims multiple NFL players, coaches, and executives obtained fraudulent COVID vaccination cards without ever receiving the vaccine.“Let’s just be honest… going back to 2020 there were multiple players, coaches, and executives that fraudulently got their COVID shot—yes, I said it. ”According to Newton, some people paid for fake vaccination cards to satisfy NFL protocols and avoid restrictions — and he claims nurses were making serious money providing them. His comments came while defending Aaron Rodgers and criticizing how the NFL and media handled players who questioned COVID-era policies. If Newton’s allegations are true, then the obvious question is: How many people were publicly shamed, fined, benched, or vilified for refusing to play along while others simply paid for a piece of paper? Funny how some of those “rules” apparently weren’t quite as sacred behind closed doors.  |
Those of us who caught COVID and were sick for a week or so were poisoned by Fauci, China etc since it was cooked up in a lab in China to circumvent USA restrictions where that sort of research was paused under Obama. Peter Daszak, under EcoHealth Alliance, funded bat coronavirus research (USA tax dollars) at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China.
- Jan 25, 2021 — In a text exchange with then-CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and Vivek Murthy, Fauci wrote that because many people had significant cytokine storm and fever after the second mRNA dose, "this theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester." Source: text message itself, recovered from Fauci's government phone, released by Sens. Johnson and Paul on Aug 10, 2026. The Federalist
- Feb 3, 2021 — In an interview with Dr. Howard Bauchner, then editor-in-chief of JAMA, Fauci stated: "[FDA] have found thus far and we have to be careful but thus far no red flags about that, about pregnant women." This was made in reference to over 10,000 pregnant women who had received the vaccine at that point. Source: recorded JAMA interview. Ron Johnson
- Feb 10, 2021 — At a White House briefing, Fauci said: "Since the [Emergency Use Authorization] and under the [Emergency Use Authorization], approximately 20,000 pregnant women have been vaccinated with no red flags, as we say, and this is being monitored by the CDC and the FDA." Source: contemporaneous press coverage (Politico, Daily Mail, NY Post) of the briefing itself. Yahoo!
The VAERS/algorithm allegation (per Johnson's April 29, 2026 subcommittee report and independent fact-check):
- March 1, 2021 — FDA drug-center scientist Dr. Ana Szarfman told CBER Director Dr. Peter Marks that the FDA's standard signal-detection algorithm (MGPS — Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker) "is not the state of the art" for the volume of reports VAERS was receiving. Szarfman was the lead author of the 2002 paper that originally brought that algorithm into FDA use, and the algorithm's original designer, William DuMouchel, agreed with her concern. Ron Johnson
- The mechanism ("masking") — because VAERS was flooded with an unprecedented volume of reports tied to the COVID-19 rollout, the sheer mass of data overwhelmed the standard tracking algorithm, which can drown out real signals for individual adverse events. Szarfman and DuMouchel ran a regression-adjusted alternative model designed to correct for this. Celinegounder
- ~26 days later (late March 2021) — using this updated approach, senior FDA officials were shown roughly 25 statistically elevated signals, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, cerebral artery occlusion, basal ganglia stroke, agonal rhythm, and Bell's palsy.
- By May 2021, CBER leadership directed Szarfman to hold off on producing further data-mining reports; by September 2021 she was told to cease that work, per internal FDA communications described in the subcommittee report.
Fauci's defense -- it all depends on what the definition of "red flags" is.
Pregnant women were excluded from the original Pfizer and Moderna Phase 3 clinical trials, meaning that when the vaccines moved into general use under Emergency Use Authorization, their administration to pregnant women was, in practical terms, experimental for that population specifically — no completed trial data existed to establish a safety profile before rollout began. This made VAERS, the passive adverse-event surveillance system, a critical rather than merely supplementary data-collection function: it was the primary mechanism by which any pregnancy-specific safety signal not caught in trials would first surface. Fauci's Jan. 25, 2021 text to Walensky and Murthy — that cytokine storm and fever after the second dose "theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester" — was, in precise terms, a theoretical mechanism, not an observed data signal. His subsequent public statements, on Feb. 3 and Feb. 10, that there were "no red flags," used "red flags" in the narrower sense common to FDA/surveillance parlance: an observed statistical signal in monitored data, as distinct from an unconfirmed hypothesis about a possible pathway to harm. Read that narrowly, the two statements are technically reconcilable — he could truthfully say no data signal had appeared while still holding a private theoretical concern that hadn't yet produced one. But this technical distinction is almost certainly lost on the general public. The overwhelming majority of pregnant women hearing "no red flags" from the nation's top infectious disease official would not have parsed it as "no confirmed statistical signal has yet emerged in surveillance data" — they would have reasonably heard it as "there is no known reason for concern," a materially broader and more reassuring claim than the narrow one Fauci could technically defend. That gap between the technical precision available to him and the plain meaning received by his audience is the crux of the obfuscation debate: whether his phrasing was calibrated to be truthful in a way that predictably misled the people it was meant to inform.
For a general audience, like the February 10th Whitehouse briefing — Merriam-Webster's everyday-usage entry — "red flag" as a noun is defined roughly as:
"something that indicates or draws attention to a problem, danger, or fault" — a warning sign.
In ordinary, non-technical speech, that's the entirety of the meaning: a red flag is any indicator, of any kind, that something might be wrong. It carries no built-in requirement about:
Pregnant women were excluded from the original Pfizer and Moderna Phase 3 clinical trials, meaning that when the vaccines moved into general use under Emergency Use Authorization, their administration to pregnant women was, in practical terms, experimental for that population specifically — no completed trial data existed to establish a safety profile before rollout began. This made VAERS, the passive adverse-event surveillance system, a critical rather than merely supplementary data-collection function: it was the primary mechanism by which any pregnancy-specific safety signal not caught in trials would first surface. Fauci's Jan. 25, 2021 text to Walensky and Murthy — that cytokine storm and fever after the second dose "theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester" — was, in precise terms, a theoretical mechanism, not an observed data signal. His subsequent public statements, on Feb. 3 and Feb. 10, that there were "no red flags," used "red flags" in the narrower sense common to FDA/surveillance parlance: an observed statistical signal in monitored data, as distinct from an unconfirmed hypothesis about a possible pathway to harm. Read that narrowly, the two statements are technically reconcilable — he could truthfully say no data signal had appeared while still holding a private theoretical concern that hadn't yet produced one. But this technical distinction is almost certainly lost on the general public. The overwhelming majority of pregnant women hearing "no red flags" from the nation's top infectious disease official would not have parsed it as "no confirmed statistical signal has yet emerged in surveillance data" — they would have reasonably heard it as "there is no known reason for concern," a materially broader and more reassuring claim than the narrow one Fauci could technically defend. That gap between the technical precision available to him and the plain meaning received by his audience is the crux of the obfuscation debate: whether his phrasing was calibrated to be truthful in a way that predictably misled the people it was meant to inform.
For a general audience, like the February 10th Whitehouse briefing — Merriam-Webster's everyday-usage entry — "red flag" as a noun is defined roughly as:
"something that indicates or draws attention to a problem, danger, or fault" — a warning sign.
In ordinary, non-technical speech, that's the entirety of the meaning: a red flag is any indicator, of any kind, that something might be wrong. It carries no built-in requirement about:
- the type of evidence behind it (a hunch, an anecdote, a documented pattern — all count)
- the source of the concern (personal observation, expert opinion, or formal data)
- a statistical threshold being crossed
- whether it's confirmed or merely suspected
COVID=
Another aspect
CAM NEWTON DROPS A COVID-ERA BOMBSHELL
Former NFL star Cam Newton says it’s time to admit what was allegedly happening behind the scenes during the pandemic. Newton claims multiple NFL players, coaches, and executives obtained fraudulent COVID vaccination cards without ever receiving the vaccine.“Let’s just be honest… going back to 2020 there were multiple players, coaches, and executives that fraudulently got their COVID shot—yes, I said it.
”According to Newton, some people paid for fake vaccination cards to satisfy NFL protocols and avoid restrictions — and he claims nurses were making serious money providing them.
His comments came while defending Aaron Rodgers and criticizing how the NFL and media handled players who questioned COVID-era policies. If Newton’s allegations are true, then the obvious question is: How many people were publicly shamed, fined, benched, or vilified for refusing to play along while others simply paid for a piece of paper?
Funny how some of those “rules” apparently weren’t quite as sacred behind closed doors.
View attachment 293928
Certificate
Of
Vaccination
ID
President Biden is solely responsible for Fauci's grant of immunity on Bidens last day in office.
President Trump was part of the immunity grant to pharmaceutical companies producing the COVID vaccine.
This was related to Trump's Secretary of Health and Human Services.Who invoked the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act,which was passed into law back in 2005.
President Trump was part of the immunity grant to pharmaceutical companies producing the COVID vaccine.
This was related to Trump's Secretary of Health and Human Services.Who invoked the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act,which was passed into law back in 2005.
Probably a quid pro quo deal where Biden got something in return for doing the pardon. I do not see Joe Biden doing it all for free on the last day in office. We all should recall the 10% for the big guy....Kickback identified on Hunter laptop and Joe Biden as the big guy involving dealings with China
| The “10% for the big guy” claim comes from a May 13, 2017 email related to a proposed joint venture involving Hunter Biden and associates with the Chinese energy conglomerate CEFC (China Energy Fund Committee / CEFC China Energy), not the Ukrainian Burisma dealings. It is one of the more discussed pieces of evidence from Hunter Biden’s laptop and related records regarding potential family involvement in his foreign business activities. nypost.com The Email and ContextBusiness associate James Gilliar emailed Hunter Biden, Tony Bobulinski, Rob Walker, and others outlining a provisional equity split for a new entity (tied to what became discussions around Oneida Holdings / SinoHawk Holdings) that would partner with CEFC interests:
nypost.com Tony Bobulinski (a former U.S. Navy officer brought in as a potential CEO for the venture) has publicly and under oath identified “the big guy” as Joe Biden. He has stated that Hunter referred to his father that way (or as “my Chairman”), that Joe’s involvement was discussed, and that he met Joe Biden in person in May 2017 (including in Beverly Hills) in connection with the deal. Related messages include warnings not to mention Joe “being involved” except face-to-face because “they are paranoid.” Bobulinski has described the Biden family business as centered on Joe. nypost.com The email and related materials from the laptop have been authenticated by multiple parties, including people on the chain and forensic/FBI handling of the device and related devices. nypost.com |
With the autopen,it could be anyone who pardoned Fauci and others.
For a price.
Biden has admittedly been corrupt from the beginning of his political career.
Biden as VP openly admitted he could be bribed.
And I am endorsed his run for president only after it was announced Harris would be his VP pick.
Which is why manh think,and a Senator even implied as much on the record, Obama was the shadow president.
Which would explain Biden and his seeming defference to Muslim countries.
Generally the pens don't go rogue like this, usually they obey the instructions of the President. I think we can all remember Michael Moore trying to get a Ficus plant elected to office, FDR paved the way for people in wheel chairs to be president and Reagan paved the way for people with Alzheimers to be president. But Biden was the first to cede authority to a pen.
Another aspect
CAM NEWTON DROPS A COVID-ERA BOMBSHELL
Former NFL star Cam Newton says it’s time to admit what was allegedly happening behind the scenes during the pandemic. Newton claims multiple NFL players, coaches, and executives obtained fraudulent COVID vaccination cards without ever receiving the vaccine.“Let’s just be honest… going back to 2020 there were multiple players, coaches, and executives that fraudulently got their COVID shot—yes, I said it.
”According to Newton, some people paid for fake vaccination cards to satisfy NFL protocols and avoid restrictions — and he claims nurses were making serious money providing them.
His comments came while defending Aaron Rodgers and criticizing how the NFL and media handled players who questioned COVID-era policies. If Newton’s allegations are true, then the obvious question is: How many people were publicly shamed, fined, benched, or vilified for refusing to play along while others simply paid for a piece of paper?
Funny how some of those “rules” apparently weren’t quite as sacred behind closed doors.
View attachment 293928
zero surprise at this.
teams were reporting that 80-90% of players and staff fully vaxed..
yeah, right..
He seems so proud of his "integrity.".
He's "honest enough" to outright admit that he's a cheap young prostitute!
During COVID there were news reports about counterfeit vaccination cards.zero surprise at this.
teams were reporting that 80-90% of players and staff fully vaxed..
yeah, right..
Obviously that would happen when peoples jobs and lifestyles depended on having one.
Hubby calls the whole thing a social experiment.
I agree. Let's see if they'll comply.
How far can we push them and violate
their rights?
don't remember the guy's name. but i heard a interview with a c d c executive in april-may of 2020 and he said " we were hoping for a 50% rate of people complying to our guidelines. we seem to be getting about a 85% rate, and we could not be happier"
your husband was correct.
Remember how people who refused the vaccine or questioned how fast it was made ready,when it takes years to create vaccines,and those folks were villified for not obeying?
"Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don't want war neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship.
Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."
Nazi, Hermann Goering
Book: Germany Reborn
Makes it even more honorable for those like Kyrie and Djokovich and Aaron Rodgers to publicly refuse to get the shot.zero surprise at this.
teams were reporting that 80-90% of players and staff fully vaxed..
yeah, right..
The vaccine is the goose chase, It's that you caught it in the first place that's the lie. It stays in your tissue and wakes up afterwards.
Assuming Big Pharma did not enjoy liability protection thru both the PREP Act and National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (VICP), pharma would need liability protection from insurance companies for damage claims from their product. How likely would insurance companies be to provide broad and affordable coverage for the COVID shots and the Hep B shots at birth? Not likely, meaning pharma would not be able to sell their for-profit products.