Z you've gone down the rabbit hole. Hate to see it. You're not a stupid person. You're so deep in conspiracy theory that no one can tell you anything different. No one is making any rules, just that you deal in reality and facts. But you aren't. You're following a silly woman who believed one thing, got married and changed her complete POV to Catholic. Are you now of the Catholic faith? Do you believe as they believe? You believe the Jews of of the devil, what of the Catholics and what they believe?
I am not following her, I am simply agreeing that she has the right to ask questions.
I asked google AI why she is called an anti semite. It gave me a number of compelling reasons, so I asked to get the verbatim quote and the context.
For example, the first very compelling reason is that she says Mengele's experiments were bizarre propaganda. Denying Mengele was a monster, yes, that is compelling evidence. So I asked for the quote. What she actually said is that one of the stories about Mengele was that he cut people into pieces and then stitched them back together again like Frankenstein. She said that sounded like bizarre propaganda. I agree with that, without pictures and documents and witnesses that does sound like bizarre propaganda. So people are twisting what she said in that case to make it sound anti semitic.
Another example, it said she called the Jewish state a demonic state and a cult nation.
Wow, that definitely sounds like she is anti semitic. So what was the quote?
What she actually said was that the star of David is a Hexagon and is a symbol used by the occult. This is fact, and that is where the term "hex" comes from. I also have not been able to find any scriptural basis for the "star of David" and I know that the Free Masons, an occultic, Satanic group traces their roots back to King Solomon. To me what she said is no different from someone saying there are occultic symbols on the US dollar, or that the Free Masons designed Washington DC. This is now the second instance of someone twisting what she said to make it sound anti semitic.
She has also compared the label of "anti semitism" as an attempt to shut down debate and says it has been weaponized the same way black lives matter weaponized their past as though anyone questioning anyone who was black was therefore a racist. I have no issue with that comparison, she is not disputing slavery or racism in the US, nor is she disputing persecution of the Jews in history, rather she is challenging the use of terms like "Black lives matter" and "Anti semitism". I think that is fair.
Now she says other things I have no proof to support or dismiss. The idea that a small group of people control the media, or that some people are bribing pastors to attack her. I have no idea one way or the other and so don't care. If I have no proof that something is true or false, I simply ignore it, I'm not going to use it to raise or lower her credibility.
However, I do agree with Steve Bannon at considering if the attacks on a person might be because they are over the target. Using the analogy of a bomber on a mission coming under heavy fire when they approach a target.