1 Day Ago) Tyler Robinson , accused of the murder of Charlie Kirk, has second court hearing

[ThereRoseaLamb]

No, it would not depend on the facts for why you were against him. Netanyahu is not a representative of the Israel of God.

Never said he was. And I was saying it would depend on why you, meaning she, was against him, not you. We're talking about her POV.

The only person who can claim that would be Jesus. Being "pro Netanyahu" for any reason does not mean I am supporting the Israel of God, and therefore being anti Netanyahu for any reason can not mean I am against the Israel of God.

Never said being against Netanyahu was against God.

Also being for the Israel of God can not be interpreted as being for Netanyahu.

Being for or against depends on facts.

As Churchgoer accurately pointed out, the term "anti semite" is ridiculous.

Anti- Jew, racist, call it what you like. Changing the name doesn't change anything. Dems do that all the time.

By that measure every person including all Jews who reject Jesus are "anti semites". The accurate term should be "anti the Israel of God". Paul told us that not all who claim to be Jews are the Israel of God.

Ok, by your standard everyone who rejects Christ as their Savior is anti-Semite. If that's the way you want to try and win the argument, I'd say that's daft. Fine. But you can still be racist and anti- Jew. smh

 

[ThereRoseaLamb]

Do not twist the simple gospel!

You've been given this answer enough times. And do not accuse me of twisting Scripture. smh Are you having trouble with your memory? If so I can understand, I don't know your age. Otherwise this has been answered too many times for you to keep bringing it up.

 

[ZNP]

She claims to have been a friend of Charlies.
Meanwhile,part of her Kirk assassination conspiracy agenda is to claim Erika was having an affair. And conspired with her TP USA lover to kill him.

Nothing says I love you like a pyrotechnic display at the memorial.

 

[Churchgoer]

You've been given this answer enough times. And do not accuse me of twisting Scripture. smh Are you having trouble with your memory? If so I can understand, I don't know your age. Otherwise this has been answered too many times for you to keep bringing it up.

if it is a good point, it is worth mentioning it everyday.

How many times can we thank God for blood covenant with Jesus?

 

[Bible_Locket]

Since Charlie was using his handheld mic, there isnt really a way of knowing if any of his Rodemics she has in her possession are the same one.

In any case, the videos are an eye opener, and demonstrate why the US needs domestic electronics/materials industries.

No,there is a way to know it is the same microphone. It is now kept at TPUSA. And it still has his blood on it.

 

[Bible_Locket]

What did owen say that is anti jew?

Can someone give an example? Not video, too long. Just in text.

Would you say Jesus is anti jew? Or Jesus is for jew?

The video is
2 minutes and 45 seconds long.

 

[Bible_Locket]

She's Antisemite, to try to say because the Jews aren't Christian that no one can be racist against them is false.

One thing seems obvious. Now that the truth about Owens is being posted here, we'll find out who is with her.

 

[Bible_Locket]

She created a documentary film playing on the horror franchise,Bride of Chucky.

She titled it,Bride of Charlie.
She's proudly anti-Jew.

 

[Bible_Locket]

Nothing but conspiracy theory. It's gotten old.

It's gone into the conspiracy realm because of certain members declaring the evidence against Robinson is fake.

This thread is where it belongs.

The conspiracy Trolls shouldn't be allowed to dismiss real news again.

They want Robinson to get the benefit of the doubt.

That's on them.

Trolls shouldn't control the narrative!

Moderators here have more integrity than to allow them to.

 

[Bible_Locket]

She doesn't have any evidence, she's a nutter and will say anything to get a click.

It was noted in a video where Anti-Semite Owens got her backside handed to her over all this. She's making a fortune pushing these lies.

She use to work for Turning Point. Left in 2019. Or,was fired.

She's supposedly right wing conservative. Look at the image she gives that demographic.

When in reality she presents like the tool of far left.

This thread is news.

Don't like the conspiracy theories? Ignore them!

Folks crow about censorship, but insist conspiracy derailers should have the power to take a news piece out of the news forum?


The evidence against Assassin Robinson is solid.

 

[ZNP]

She created a documentary film playing on the horror franchise,Bride of Chucky.

She titled it,Bride of Charlie.
She's proudly anti-Jew.

This has nothing to do with this thread concerning the trial of the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk.

 

[ZNP]

It's gone into the conspiracy realm because of certain members declaring the evidence against Robinson is fake.

This thread is where it belongs.

The conspiracy Trolls shouldn't be allowed to dismiss real news again.

They want Robinson to get the benefit of the doubt.

That's on them.

Trolls shouldn't control the narrative!

Moderators here have more integrity than to allow them to.

This has nothing to do with this thread concerning the trial of the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk.

 

[ZNP]

It was noted in a video where Anti-Semite Owens got her backside handed to her over all this. She's making a fortune pushing these lies.

She use to work for Turning Point. Left in 2019. Or,was fired.

She's supposedly right wing conservative. Look at the image she gives that demographic.

When in reality she presents like the tool of far left.

This thread is news.

Don't like the conspiracy theories? Ignore them!

Folks crow about censorship, but insist conspiracy derailers should have the power to take a news piece out of the news forum?


The evidence against Assassin Robinson is solid.

This has nothing to do with this thread concerning the trial of the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk. Why are you so desperate to prevent anyone from asking legitimate questions about the investigation of Charlie Kirk's assassination?

 

[ZNP]

So then, the question at hand. We have a video of someone who works for TPUSA removing the SD Card from one camera 4 minutes after Charlie Kirk was shot, walking behind the tent, putting it in his pocket, and then texting someone. When asked about why he did this he said he was worried about thieves. There were four cameras. He did not pack up any cameras nor did he pull SD cards from the other three cameras. So what was so valuable about that particular SD Card that he worried thieves would steal it. TPUSA has also said that the FBI now has the SD Card. The assassination is being tried by the Utah police and prosecutor. Why doesn't the Utah police and prosecutor have the SD Card and why doesn't the defense attorney also have a copy of it? Instead a 3 minute video was released that TPUSA describes as "an accurate representation" of the video. This clip is zoomed in so that some of what was on the video was cropped out. I think it is reasonable for everyone to want to see the actual footage rather than "an accurate representation" of the footage. I think it is also reasonable to know who was texted once this SD Card was pulled and what the text said.

 

[Bible_Locket]

This has nothing to do with this thread concerning the trial of the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk.

Promoting falsehood.
Again?

 

[Bible_Locket]

I suggest members here interested in the actual OP topic stick to it.

Ignore one who condemns that topic focus and promotes conspiracy theory
incessantly instead.
SD card removal now,is not the topic.

 

[Bible_Locket]

Just a reminder regarding the topic of this thread,the trial of Tyler Robinson.

Let's not forget,he confessed to assassinating Charlie Kirk. He confessed to his Dad and to his gay lover.

His lover testified to that.

 

[ZNP]

Just a reminder regarding the topic of this thread,the trial of Tyler Robinson.

Let's not forget,he confessed to assassinating Charlie Kirk. He confessed to his Dad and to his gay lover.

His lover testified to that.

Yes, he is being tried for the assassination of Charlie Kirk, anything relevant to that trial and finding the truth as to who was involved in the assassination is relevant to this thread.

Let's not forget there are many examples where a person who confessed to doing a crime didn't actually do it.

In forensics we have a saying "people lie, physical evidence doesn't lie" the SD Card with a video right behind Charlie Kirk when he was killed would be some of the best physical evidence we can get to uncover the truth.

 

[Churchgoer]

How about the weapon, assemble, disassemble, assemble again?

 

[ZNP]

Just a reminder regarding the topic of this thread,the trial of Tyler Robinson.

Yes, how does it feel doing a thorough and comprehensive investigation so that we get to the truth and all questions are answered and everyone knows that we got the killer?