1 Day Ago) Tyler Robinson , accused of the murder of Charlie Kirk, has second court hearing

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I am not following her, I am simply agreeing that she has the right to ask questions.

She's not asking questions, she's making crazy conspiracy theories. And if Charlie could look down from heaven I'm sure he'd be heartbroken that his so called friend instead of standing by his wife and mother of his children and comforting her in his tragic death is making up stupid accusations for clicks against his wife.



I asked google AI why she is called an anti semite. It gave me a number of compelling reasons, so I asked to get the verbatim quote and the context.

For example, the first very compelling reason is that she says Mengele's experiments were bizarre propaganda. Denying Mengele was a monster, yes, that is compelling evidence. So I asked for the quote. What she actually said is that one of the stories about Mengele was that he cut people into pieces and then stitched them back together again like Frankenstein. She said that sounded like bizarre propaganda. I agree with that, without pictures and documents and witnesses that does sound like bizarre propaganda. So people are twisting what she said in that case to make it sound anti semitic.

Seriously? We're going down this path are we? We have first hand accounts and testimony of what Mengele actually did and they are just as horrific.

While Mengele did not perform Frankenstein-style assembly experiments, a different Nazi doctor at Auschwitz, August Hirt, did collect body parts for anatomical studies. More importantly, another infamous Nazi doctor, Dr. Carl Clauberg, and others did perform brutal surgical experiments.
The closest documented historical event to the "Frankenstein" story involves Mengele sewing two Romani twins together back-to-back (creating artificial conjoined twins) in an attempt to see if their blood vessels and organs would interface. The children suffered terribly and died of gangrene days later.

He injected chemicals into children's eyes to try and change their color, often causing blindness or severe pain.

He did perform amputations and surgeries without anesthesia to study shock and gangrene, which likely fueled the rumors of him "cutting people apart."

Where is the propaganda?? Owens knows dam# well what she's doing. Trying to sow doubt




Another example, it said she called the Jewish state a demonic state and a cult nation.

Wow, that definitely sounds like she is anti semitic. So what was the quote?

What she actually said was that the star of David is a Hexagon and is a symbol used by the occult. This is fact, and that is where the term "hex" comes from.

The Star of David is a hexagram, not a hexagon, and the word "hex" comes from the German word for witch (Hexe), completely unrelated to the geometric prefix "hexa

While it is a common myth that links the two terms because they sound similar, their linguistic origins are entirely separate.






I also have not been able to find any scriptural basis for the "star of David" and I know that the Free Masons, an occultic, Satanic group traces their roots back to King Solomon. To me what she said is no different from someone saying there are occultic symbols on the US dollar, or that the Free Masons designed Washington DC. This is now the second instance of someone twisting what she said to make it sound anti semitic.

There are all kinds of symbols we all use every day that are pagan/ occultic or other Gods. From the money we use to the clothes we wear and cars we drive. Theres no proof the Star of David is satanic.


She has also compared the label of "anti semitism" as an attempt to shut down debate

Funny how quickly her opinions changed on everything she believed when she met her husband. I would not change my faith for my husband. My husband knew where I stood when we were married and that I would not change. But overnight Catholic good everyone else bad. She seems pretty easy to lead around by the nose.



Now she says other things I have no proof to support or dismiss. The idea that a small group of people control the media, or that some people are bribing pastors to attack her. I have no idea one way or the other and so don't care. If I have no proof that something is true or false, I simply ignore it, I'm not going to use it to raise or lower her credibility.

Like her absurd ramblings on France's First Lady? Or how she blames the Jews for 9/11. She's an empty headed shill. And that's putting it nicely.
 
Folks crow about censorship, but insist conspiracy derailers should have the power to take a news piece out of the news forum?


The evidence against Assassin Robinson is solid.

I'm going by what has been done here in the past. Real news is posted here, conspiracy theories have their own forum. That's all I'm saying. Pretty much agree on all the rest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NightTwister
I'm going by what has been done here in the past. Real news is posted here, conspiracy theories have their own forum. That's all I'm saying. Pretty much agree on all the rest.
I read the OP. It's news.

Theres another thread where someone asked a news item be moved to conspiracy forum.

It looks to be a tactic employed by those who don't want news items to remain a serious conversation.

The derailers inject conspiracy nonsense over and over again hoping to outweigh real news.

Then,they ask the thread that began as real news be moved because,thanks to them and their cohorts, the thread has become filled with conspiracy theories.

More school yard displays.

Maybe when school is back in session those behaviors will be absent most of the day.

They can't carry on adult conversations.

So,they derail a thread so it is moved to a forum where the very title of the board itself implies its content isn't to be taken seriously.

I notice too,those same people don't participate in the Bible Scripture threads very often,if at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThereRoseaLamb
I read the OP. It's news.

Agreed.



Theres another thread where someone asked a news item be moved to conspiracy forum.

It looks to be a tactic employed by those who don't want news items to remain a serious conversation.

The derailers inject conspiracy nonsense over and over again hoping to outweigh real news.

I hadn't noticed that. Mods?




Then,they ask the thread that began as real news be moved because,thanks to them and their cohorts, the thread has become filled with conspiracy theories.

More school yard displays.

Maybe when school is back in session those behaviors will be absent most of the day.

They can't carry on adult conversations.

So,they derail a thread so it is moved to a forum where the very title of the board itself implies its content isn't to be taken seriously.

I notice too,those same people don't participate in the Bible Scripture threads very often,if at all.

Ok, now I understand the situation going on. Thank you for filling me in. I will leave it at that and hope the mods take care of derailing issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bible_Locket
She's not asking questions,
Yes, she is asking to see the full footage from that one camera and not the zoomed in 3 minutes that they have let us see. She wants to see the full 26 minutes that isn't cropped.

She is also asking to know what number the guy texted

and she is asking to know what the text said.

One more question, why did they give the SD Card to the FBI and not to the police or the prosecutor?

That is 4 questions that anyone who wants the full story would also want to know.

How would you feel knowing that we asked every question and we silenced all those who were skeptical so that everyone was in full agreement that we got the whole truth?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charlesiii
Agreed.





I hadn't noticed that. Mods?






Ok, now I understand the situation going on. Thank you for filling me in. I will leave it at that and hope the mods take care of derailing issues.
Yes, and the videos that were shown of the guy taking the SD Card, of him putting it in his pocket and texting someone and of the interview where the TPUSA guy said he did this because he knows people are evil are all news as well. Not theories. Facts of the case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charlesiii
Agreed.





I hadn't noticed that. Mods?






Ok, now I understand the situation going on. Thank you for filling me in. I will leave it at that and hope the mods take care of derailing issues.
I think if we stop taking the derail bait ZNP posts, and ignore that others like them may stop.
I think ZNP and others like them derail this thread now in hopes their behavior is reported to the point the thread is shut down.

Don't report them.


They refuse to remain on topic.

The news about Robinson is the topic.That should tell us something.

We ,they,can start a thread about Owens. But they don't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThereRoseaLamb
I think if we stop taking the derail bait ZNP posts, and ignore that others like them may stop.
I think ZNP and others like them derail this thread now in hopes their behavior is reported to the point the thread is shut down.

Don't report them.


They refuse to remain on topic.

The news about Robinson is the topic.That should tell us something.

We ,they,can start a thread about Owens. But they don't.
No one cares about Owens. What we care about is the video, the text message, who was texted, and why key evidence is held by the FBI and not the police and the Prosecuting attorney.

I am not the one who is trying to derail this thread making it about Owens.

You still have not answered my question. How would you feel to know that the investigation turned over every rock, that every question was answered, and everyone knows that those responsible have been brought to justice?
 
  • Love
Reactions: Charlesiii
Yes, she is asking to see the full footage from that one camera and not the zoomed in 3 minutes that they have let us see. She wants to see the full 26 minutes that isn't cropped.

She is also asking to know what number the guy texted

and she is asking to know what the text said.

One more question, why did they give the SD Card to the FBI and not to the police or the prosecutor?

That is 4 questions that anyone who wants the full story would also want to know.

How would you feel knowing that we asked every question and we silenced all those who were skeptical so that everyone was in full agreement that we got the whole truth?

Listen, we all love to be armchair detectives. Owens just goes off the reservation on every topic. Thing is, she makes buckets of money every time she does.
 
Listen, we all love to be armchair detectives. Owens just goes off the reservation on every topic. Thing is, she makes buckets of money every time she does.
Well, why not get the answers to these questions, fastest way to put an end to this. The video I put up yesterday has already gotten 1.2 million views in one day. meanwhile someone put up some mocking video of her that has been up for a month and maybe has 6,000 views. There are a lot of people asking these questions and if we learned anything from the assassination of JFK it is this: if the trial doesn't satisfy everyone's questions it will not resolve it simply because some official says it does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charlesiii
Well, why not get the answers to these questions, fastest way to put an end to this.
Charlie Kirk was a high profile public figure who was assassinated on an American campus.

That's why the FBI is investigating this assassination also.
That is not an answer to the question. Right now the guy on trial for killing Charlie Kirk by law should have access to that footage, and the prosecutor should. Not to a "representation" of the footage, but to the actual footage. That is US law and denying him his rights is justification for a mistrial.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Charlesiii
Telling people what to say, what not to say, what kind of opinion people should have.....
which country are we in?
No cursing, no name calling, just regular talking, but can't express opposite view? Can't ask questions?

Wow, a bit anti freedom i would say, to the least.
 
Telling people what to say, what not to say, what kind of opinion people should have.....
which country are we in?
No cursing, no name calling, just regular talking, but can't express opposite view? Can't ask questions?
In America we have the right to freedom of speech.

This does not mean you can say anything you want without censure.

Look it up.

The FCC guarantees you will be stopped from saying things unapproved by censors and the law on radio and network TV.

You also cannot legally scream,"gun!" or "fire!" in a crowded theater.
Wow, a bit anti freedom i would say, to the least.
Then you are very new to forums.

Every actively moderated forum on the Internet has rules and Terms of Use clauses.

Also, derailing threads, Trolling, is also against the rules of most forums.

It is only fair to a member who starts an OP to stay on topic.

Don't stand up for rule breakers. It's a bad look for any Christian.
 
In America we have the right to freedom of speech.

This does not mean you can say anything you want without censure.

Look it up.

The FCC guarantees you will be stopped from saying things unapproved by censors and the law on radio and network TV.
Absolutely, only a while ago they also mandate everyone wear mask and take covid shots.
You also cannot legally scream,"gun!" or "fire!" in a crowded theater.
We are talking about questions and comments on an assassin case.
Then you are very new to forums.

Every actively moderated forum on the Internet has rules and Terms of Use clauses.

Also, derailing threads, Trolling, is also against the rules of most forums.
How is opposite opinion derailing and trolling?
If one want to celebrate vaccine, go ahead. If another want to reject vaccine, go ahead. Both should be free to express their point of view. Same goes for murder case investigation.
It is only fair to a member who starts an OP to stay on topic.

Don't stand up for rule breakers. It's a bad look for any Christian.
Yes, according to your definition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charlesiii
The FCC guarantees you will be stopped from saying things unapproved by censors and the law on radio and network TV.

You also cannot legally scream,"gun!" or "fire!" in a crowded theater.
Totally false. You can certainly scream "gun" in a crowded theater if someone has a gun. You can also scream "fire" if there is a fire. Did you ever hear the expression "If you see something, say something". Stop spreading falsehoods. There are consequences for lying.

So besides being false, it is also a false equivalence. During any investigation you are certainly allowed to go down rabbit holes, theorize, and examine different avenues even if they don't pan out. The idea that they would control an investigation from the beginning as to what you can and cannot question is something straight out of the KGB or the Gestapo.