How about the weapon, assemble, disassemble, assemble again?
How about the weapon, assemble, disassemble, assemble again?
That rumor started early on. No evidence, credible evidence, to support it though.How about the weapon, assemble, disassemble, assemble again?
I am not following her, I am simply agreeing that she has the right to ask questions.
I asked google AI why she is called an anti semite. It gave me a number of compelling reasons, so I asked to get the verbatim quote and the context.
For example, the first very compelling reason is that she says Mengele's experiments were bizarre propaganda. Denying Mengele was a monster, yes, that is compelling evidence. So I asked for the quote. What she actually said is that one of the stories about Mengele was that he cut people into pieces and then stitched them back together again like Frankenstein. She said that sounded like bizarre propaganda. I agree with that, without pictures and documents and witnesses that does sound like bizarre propaganda. So people are twisting what she said in that case to make it sound anti semitic.
Another example, it said she called the Jewish state a demonic state and a cult nation.
Wow, that definitely sounds like she is anti semitic. So what was the quote?
What she actually said was that the star of David is a Hexagon and is a symbol used by the occult. This is fact, and that is where the term "hex" comes from.
I also have not been able to find any scriptural basis for the "star of David" and I know that the Free Masons, an occultic, Satanic group traces their roots back to King Solomon. To me what she said is no different from someone saying there are occultic symbols on the US dollar, or that the Free Masons designed Washington DC. This is now the second instance of someone twisting what she said to make it sound anti semitic.
She has also compared the label of "anti semitism" as an attempt to shut down debate
Now she says other things I have no proof to support or dismiss. The idea that a small group of people control the media, or that some people are bribing pastors to attack her. I have no idea one way or the other and so don't care. If I have no proof that something is true or false, I simply ignore it, I'm not going to use it to raise or lower her credibility.
Folks crow about censorship, but insist conspiracy derailers should have the power to take a news piece out of the news forum?
The evidence against Assassin Robinson is solid.
I read the OP. It's news.I'm going by what has been done here in the past. Real news is posted here, conspiracy theories have their own forum. That's all I'm saying. Pretty much agree on all the rest.
I read the OP. It's news.
Theres another thread where someone asked a news item be moved to conspiracy forum.
It looks to be a tactic employed by those who don't want news items to remain a serious conversation.
The derailers inject conspiracy nonsense over and over again hoping to outweigh real news.
Then,they ask the thread that began as real news be moved because,thanks to them and their cohorts, the thread has become filled with conspiracy theories.
More school yard displays.
Maybe when school is back in session those behaviors will be absent most of the day.
They can't carry on adult conversations.
So,they derail a thread so it is moved to a forum where the very title of the board itself implies its content isn't to be taken seriously.
I notice too,those same people don't participate in the Bible Scripture threads very often,if at all.
Yes, she is asking to see the full footage from that one camera and not the zoomed in 3 minutes that they have let us see. She wants to see the full 26 minutes that isn't cropped.She's not asking questions,
Yes, and the videos that were shown of the guy taking the SD Card, of him putting it in his pocket and texting someone and of the interview where the TPUSA guy said he did this because he knows people are evil are all news as well. Not theories. Facts of the case.Agreed.
I hadn't noticed that. Mods?
Ok, now I understand the situation going on. Thank you for filling me in. I will leave it at that and hope the mods take care of derailing issues.
I think if we stop taking the derail bait ZNP posts, and ignore that others like them may stop.Agreed.
I hadn't noticed that. Mods?
Ok, now I understand the situation going on. Thank you for filling me in. I will leave it at that and hope the mods take care of derailing issues.
No one cares about Owens. What we care about is the video, the text message, who was texted, and why key evidence is held by the FBI and not the police and the Prosecuting attorney.I think if we stop taking the derail bait ZNP posts, and ignore that others like them may stop.
I think ZNP and others like them derail this thread now in hopes their behavior is reported to the point the thread is shut down.
Don't report them.
They refuse to remain on topic.
The news about Robinson is the topic.That should tell us something.
We ,they,can start a thread about Owens. But they don't.
Yes, she is asking to see the full footage from that one camera and not the zoomed in 3 minutes that they have let us see. She wants to see the full 26 minutes that isn't cropped.
She is also asking to know what number the guy texted
and she is asking to know what the text said.
One more question, why did they give the SD Card to the FBI and not to the police or the prosecutor?
That is 4 questions that anyone who wants the full story would also want to know.
How would you feel knowing that we asked every question and we silenced all those who were skeptical so that everyone was in full agreement that we got the whole truth?
Well, why not get the answers to these questions, fastest way to put an end to this. The video I put up yesterday has already gotten 1.2 million views in one day. meanwhile someone put up some mocking video of her that has been up for a month and maybe has 6,000 views. There are a lot of people asking these questions and if we learned anything from the assassination of JFK it is this: if the trial doesn't satisfy everyone's questions it will not resolve it simply because some official says it does.Listen, we all love to be armchair detectives. Owens just goes off the reservation on every topic. Thing is, she makes buckets of money every time she does.
Charlie Kirk was a high profile public figure who was assassinated on an American campus.Listen, we all love to be armchair detectives. Owens just goes off the reservation on every topic. Thing is, she makes buckets of money every time she does.
Just don't rise to the continual derail bait that's being posted.Agreed.
I hadn't noticed that. Mods?
Ok, now I understand the situation going on. Thank you for filling me in. I will leave it at that and hope the mods take care of derailing issues.
That is not an answer to the question. Right now the guy on trial for killing Charlie Kirk by law should have access to that footage, and the prosecutor should. Not to a "representation" of the footage, but to the actual footage. That is US law and denying him his rights is justification for a mistrial.Well, why not get the answers to these questions, fastest way to put an end to this.
Charlie Kirk was a high profile public figure who was assassinated on an American campus.
That's why the FBI is investigating this assassination also.
In America we have the right to freedom of speech.Telling people what to say, what not to say, what kind of opinion people should have.....
which country are we in?
No cursing, no name calling, just regular talking, but can't express opposite view? Can't ask questions?
Then you are very new to forums.Wow, a bit anti freedom i would say, to the least.
Absolutely, only a while ago they also mandate everyone wear mask and take covid shots.In America we have the right to freedom of speech.
This does not mean you can say anything you want without censure.
Look it up.
The FCC guarantees you will be stopped from saying things unapproved by censors and the law on radio and network TV.
We are talking about questions and comments on an assassin case.You also cannot legally scream,"gun!" or "fire!" in a crowded theater.
How is opposite opinion derailing and trolling?Then you are very new to forums.
Every actively moderated forum on the Internet has rules and Terms of Use clauses.
Also, derailing threads, Trolling, is also against the rules of most forums.
Yes, according to your definition.It is only fair to a member who starts an OP to stay on topic.
Don't stand up for rule breakers. It's a bad look for any Christian.
Totally false. You can certainly scream "gun" in a crowded theater if someone has a gun. You can also scream "fire" if there is a fire. Did you ever hear the expression "If you see something, say something". Stop spreading falsehoods. There are consequences for lying.The FCC guarantees you will be stopped from saying things unapproved by censors and the law on radio and network TV.
You also cannot legally scream,"gun!" or "fire!" in a crowded theater.