Your remarks example low quality content.Just reciting the fbi narrative and saying "candace is lying", for Ben Shapiro is really low-quality content. I cant help but think he is actually driving people toward Candace, or he is being told by someone to do these dumpster-teir videos.
The article is behind a paywall. If there is a lawsuit it should be available on a news source that is not behind a paywall.NY Times
Charlie Kirk’s Former Security Chief Sues Candace Owens for Defamation
The lawsuit focuses on remarks made by Ms. Owens, a right-wing podcaster, about Mr. Kirk’s killing, highlighting a growing tension among factions of the American right.
May,2026
Then how do I know what's on them? Aside from being a parrot; he also gets into this patronizing "you need to trust American institutions" kick... its soooooo bad.Your remarks example low quality content.
You didn't watch the videos.
You don't. As your uninformed blanket slur against them proves.Then how do I know what's on them?
Aside from being a parrot; he also gets into this patronizing "you need to trust American institutions" kick... its soooooo bad.
Ben is missing some very important things; Jesus being chief of those things; but there is a lot about America that he does not understand as well. Israel needs Ben more than we do.
www.lawnews.co.uk
So, who put out to the public that the video he gave the FBI was cropped? I feel like cropping the video before giving it to police is tampering a bit. I'd think they'd get a warrant for the uncropped version and bust the guy for doing anything to it in the first place.I understand why asking for the video footage taken behind Charlie Kirk at the time of his assassination is relevant to this trial.
Day 1 page of preliminary hearing is not available at that site.
Candace Owens.So, who put out to the public that the video he gave the FBI was cropped?
I feel like cropping the video before giving it to police is tampering a bit. I'd think they'd get a warrant for the uncropped version and bust the guy for doing anything to it in the first place.
Great, keep us updated, but not in this thread, this has nothing to do with this thread.Harpole Lawsuit , How a Security Officer for Charlie Kirk Took Candace Owens to Federal Court
By News Team
May 11, 2026
Brian Harpole Lawsuit , How a Security Officer for Charlie Kirk Took Candace Owens to Federal Court - Law News
The Harpole complaint falls under a certain type of defamation case that comes at a time when a community is still dealing with a loss. The founder of the private security company Integrity Security Solutions, Brian Harpole, has sued conservative podcaster Candace Owens, claiming that she has...www.lawnews.co.uk
Docket:
Owens is contesting this suit and the Defamation suit brought by French president Marcon's legal team.
July 2026
![]()
Candace Owens trades legal blows with Macrons over transgender accusations
Owens has repeatedly asserted with scant evidence that France's first lady is a transgender woman, saying she would "stake [her] entire professional reputation" on it.www.courthousenews.com
There is a video of him taking the SD Card 4 minutes after the shooting, so there was no question about him taking it, TPUSA confirmed he took it because "people are evil" and that the FBI now has the SD Card. The video is around 26 minutes long (that is how long the video on the other two cameras is) but all they have produced from this card is about 3 minutes long and it is zoomed in. It is a wide angle lens. He has said that it is "an accurate representation" of what is on the SD Card, a phrase that would be true even if they cropped out some of the image and would also be true if what they don't want others to see is on the 23 minutes not shown.So, who put out to the public that the video he gave the FBI was cropped? I feel like cropping the video before giving it to police is tampering a bit. I'd think they'd get a warrant for the uncropped version and bust the guy for doing anything to it in the first place.
Are Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens testifying in the Tyler Robinson trial? If not, how is this relevant to this thread?For those who watch the Ben Shapiro video,he is presenting in brief what is in evidence during these hearings.
Candace Owens is lying.
The evidence proves it.
Owens is working to say Tyler Robinson, is lying!The assassin who confessed repeatedly,and now says he regrets his actions,and he surrendered to police.
And the evidence against him,that counters Owens lies,is on the record.
Day 1 page of preliminary hearing is not available at that site.
Day 3 of the UT v. Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing. Read the transcript here.
July 9, 2026
Day 4 Transcript
Day 5 Transcript
This has nothing to do with this thread. This thread is about Tyler Robinson trial, any evidence that would either convict or exonerate him or anyone else that might have been involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. It is a criminal trial, not a spat between different organizations about what they are "implying" on their broadcasts.August 20
Times of India
Candace Owens drops new Charlie Kirk SD card footage as ques ..
Read more at:
http://m.timesofindia.com/articlesh...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
Christian Post
4 key takeaways from TPUSA's cease and desist letter, Candace Owens' response
You appear confused.Great, keep us updated, but not in this thread, this has nothing to do with this thread.