Replacement theology? Yes or No.

[Lanolin]

Scroll down the Dead Sea Scrolls to find...hold on..Luke 21:24 wasn't written on a dead sea scroll was it?

How did these gospels get delivered. Pigeon post?

I would wildly assume they looked like this

If I recall, the Ten commandments were written on 2 tablets of stone which Moses promptly broke, but they got replaced. Then they got put in the ark of covenant, which is now....where?

Along with a rod, and some leftover manna.

 

[cv5]

I also see Luke 21:24 having been fulfilled in the first century

Of course it was. But much of Luke 21 was not. This is obvious if you don't wear a supersessionist blindfold.

 

[Komentaja]

I also see Luke 21:24 having been fulfilled in the first century, specifically before 70 AD.

BEFORE AD70? But its talking about what happened after AD70, when the Jews were led away captive at that point right?

 

[HeIsHere]

Of course it was. But much of Luke 21 was not. This is obvious if you don't wear a supersessionist blindfold.

Only to the person who denies the words of Jesus spoken to the people in front of him.. and "until" does not supersede audience relevance.
Jesus does not lie to people.

 

[HeIsHere]

BEFORE AD70? But its talking about what happened after AD70, when the Jews were led away captive at that point right?

Yes it was during and after, sorry, I was more focused on the fullness of he gentiles part.

 

[Lanolin]

Only to the person who denies the words of Jesus spoken to the people in front of him.. and "until" does not supersede audience relevance.
Jesus does not lie to people.

Was the ark of covenant in the temple at the time of AD70?

Or had it completely disappeared?

Asking for a friend.

 

[Komentaja]

Yes it was during and after, sorry, I was more focused on the fullness of he gentiles part.

Alright so when is the times of the gentiles fulfilled? It says the Jews are scattered UNTIL that time occurs. Isn't it occuring now when they are returning? Or maybe it is talking about the second coming, the ultimate regathering of all God's people.

 

[Lanolin]

Alright so when is the times of the gentiles fulfilled? It says the Jews are scattered UNTIL that time occurs. Isn't it occuring now when they are returning? Or maybe it is talking about the second coming, the ultimate regathering of all God's people.

Do you read the Bible in order it was written or backwards or just stitch verses together?

Asking for a friend...

 

[cv5]

Yes it was during and after, sorry, I was more focused on the fullness of he gentiles part.

No, you are NEVER "focused on the fullness of the gentiles part".

Because if you were, you would dump your supersessionist baggage in an instant.

 

[Churchgoer]

Alright so when is the times of the gentiles fulfilled? It says the Jews are scattered UNTIL that time occurs. Isn't it occuring now when they are returning? Or maybe it is talking about the second coming, the ultimate regathering of all God's people.

God's people-> whoever accept Jesus blood covenant.
If not, then not God's people.

 

[OMC]

This post you just posted, by your speaking word by word?
Or ai?

You're more concerned with how I get my information than with the information itself. If you think what I share is a lie, then prove it. Otherwise, you're just creating distractions and distortions.

 

[Churchgoer]

You're more concerned with how I get my information than with the information itself. If you think what I share is a lie, then prove it. Otherwise, you're just creating distractions and distortions.

Thank you and please answer the original question.
If you choose not to answer, we totally understand your reason.

Appreciate some of your post seems from Human. Cheers for that!

 

[OMC]

Thank you and please answer the original question.
If you choose not to answer, we totally understand your reason.

Appreciate some of your post seems from Human. Cheers for that!

I said what I said.

 

[Churchgoer]

I said what I said.

Very humanly speaking, bravo

 

[Churchgoer]

John Piper preaches with deep seriousness about Scripture, but he does so through a theological system, not from a purely text‑first, Scripture‑only posture.
His sermons and books are filled with Bible, yet the interpretive lens he uses is consistently Reformed, Edwardsian, and shaped by his own construct of Christian Hedonism.
This means his conclusions often begin with a system and then move toward the text, rather than beginning with the text and allowing it to overturn the system when necessary.
He is not a careless interpreter — he handles Greek grammar well and respects context — but he consistently reads passages through assumptions about sovereignty, election, human inability, and joy-as-duty that come from his theological tradition.
In short, Piper is a Bible-saturated teacher whose interpretations are guided by a Reformed framework rather than a neutral, Scripture-only approach.

This post seems generated by ai. It is a load of statements, yet has no factors to back up statements.

Poor job, ai.

Hope cc will shut down ai posts like this.

 

[OMC]

Very humanly speaking, bravo

Sarcasm in Scripture is contemptuous speech — a cutting, belittling way of talking that wounds rather than builds, aligning with the biblical categories of mocking, scorning, and reviling. Sarcasm in the Bible is used by mockers, scoffers, and the proud—those who resist truth, reject correction, and speak with contempt rather than humility.

 

[Lanolin]

Can anyone please answer my friends questions?

Thanks.

I hope it will be edifying for anyone reading the answers.

 

[OMC]

This post seems generated by ai. It is a load of statements, yet has no factors to back up statements.

Poor job, ai.

Hope cc will shut down ai posts like this.

• “I am a Calvinist.” John Piper, “How I Became a Calvinist” (Desiring God)
• “I am joyfully and unapologetically Reformed.” Ask Pastor John, Episode 1221
• “My theology is rooted in the sovereignty of God as understood in the Reformed tradition.” Desiring God Conference for Pastors, 2010

These are explicit admissions that he interprets Scripture through a Reformed lens, not a neutral one.

 

[Revelation1v8]

What I am saying is that there is an intentional DISTINCTION between King of the Jews, King of Kings
vs Lord, Head, Shepherd, Bridegroom, Savior of the Church.

Never not one time in the NT is Jesus stated to be King of the Christians, this being intentional, and for good reason.

Does that really matter in the greater context and scheme of things?

Zechariah 14:9 - And the Lord shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one Lord, and his name one.

 

[Churchgoer]

• “I am a Calvinist.” John Piper, “How I Became a Calvinist” (Desiring God)
• “I am joyfully and unapologetically Reformed.” Ask Pastor John, Episode 1221
• “My theology is rooted in the sovereignty of God as understood in the Reformed tradition.” Desiring God Conference for Pastors, 2010

These are explicit admissions that he interprets Scripture through a Reformed lens, not a neutral one.

That's assuming reform itself is not neutral. Sovereign itself is not neutral.

Again thank you for your response.

If using ai, please do not reply to me.

If by yourself, please do.

Thank you.