Seems like a relevant comparison.
I remember #Believe all women I suppose #condemn all men is the corollary
Modern Relationships and Lindsey Clancy Case. 3 Children Strangled. Overwhelming Support From Females and Male Backlash.
- Thread starter Lightbeamrider
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I remember #Believe all women I suppose #condemn all men is the corollary
Blaming the husband. Not anything new and men should be aware. Can be a good husband, great provider, great dad and yet it is your fault and many women will support this.
I just leanred that the baby lived for another 3 days. I also am informed that the screams and cries coming from the husband are
so bad that they will not be heard publicly (I don't think a moment like that is for the salacious crowd to enjoy.)
I am not the one who is blaming the husband for all this. I don't see any men here blaming the husband but i do see females and then when actual exculpatory evidence is presented, the response includes some sort of unnamed salacious crowd? Is that an insinuation of some sort? Not that i care. Your credibility was shot in the behind a few pages back.
Giving the benefit of the doubt here since our other exchanges have been respectful (in this thread), do you understand that
it sounds like ALL women means ALL women when you post that way?
This is still a Christian forum and it would be good to remember that most women here are Christian and while I don't know what
most of them think about the case, plenty of people outside of the forum also read it.
This thread has had the distinct impression that ALL women are to be treated like the apparent monster Clancy is (I don't believe her story and I think the voice she heard was her own). Women are not all going to start killing their children....I said children, not aborting that is another discussion...because of this and yes I know there are already purported 'copy cats'.
Besides, 'believe all women' only worked when the democrates used it. They don't conceed belief if a Republical woman is in question.
I am just trying to get some kind of balance here. Truly.
Can u stick to the facts instead of blustering all over the place?
Well back on ignore again. I do like to give 2nd chances but some folks prefer to act like the rest of the world.
You see what you already see. This terrible case has not encouraged you to speak in a way you already do not.
Yes, I am well aware of that, my wife being one of those women who does not agree with the more extreme views of this woman's "innocence". She also did not believe in the hashtag "Believe all women" and was quite clear that women will at times lie. So just as many women in this country may not have bought into #Believe all women, they also do not buy into this woman's claims of "innocence". My point is not to make some blanket assertion about what many women might think who have so far remained silent on the issue, my point is that it sounds like the same women who came up with #Believe all women are the same that came up with the idea that this woman is innocent.
But for the sake of those who may not be familiar with the full context of this #Believe all women they were using this during Kavenaugh's hearing to be on the Supreme court. A Woman was accusing him of some form of sexual abuse, it wasn't rape, I don't really know what the crime would be called. The problem was nothing in her story could be verified and it was over 30 years prior and there had never been any charges brought against Kavanaugh. But women were screaming that you have to believe all women, even if there is no corroborating witness. Meanwhile at exactly the same time, there were thirteen women accusing Governor Andrew Cuomo of sexual harrassment and these women were silent, not a peep out of them. At the time Governor Cuomo was a front runner for a future Democratic candidate for president while Kavanaugh was nominated by a Republican president.
Dang,there are some uneducated graceless people in this community.
A man refused to obey the rules of deliberation and caused this mistrial!
A man refused to obey the rules of deliberation and caused this mistrial!
Which rule?
Legal and Jury Deliberations
In a court trial, the American Bar Association and judges enforce strict boundaries for a jury: [1, 2]
- Base decisions only on evidence: Jurors must evaluate solely the testimony and exhibits presented inside the courtroom. [1, 2]
- Ignore outside information: Jurors cannot read news reports, watch media coverage, or research the case online. [1, 2]
- Follow the law: The judge provides official instructions that define legal standards, such as "reasonable doubt," which the panel must follow. [1, 2]
- Reach agreement privately: Discussions happen behind closed doors in a private room without outsiders or the judge present. [1, 2]
- Meet voting thresholds: Criminal verdicts usually require a unanimous vote, while civil cases may require agreement from a specific majority.
Thanks
Yes I remember the Kavenaugh hearings. I understand your point and I doubt you are wrong.
I just saw/listened to the remarks of the defence lawyer. He believes his client is a wonderful person.
This is the world we live in. Thanks again
This post exemplifies the huge problem with women today. Their God given natural empathy and emotions have been warped and twisted into believing it’s “graceless” to want a triple child murderer to face consequences for her horrific crimes. Not understanding that forgiveness and those consequences are not mutually exclusive.
Thank you dear Lord that ONE man stood against 11 psychopaths.
I don't know who that one juror is but I salute him!
I think a precedent has been set here... Let's think this through...
A woman says "No" to a man. He rapes her anyway. He blames the testosterone.
A husband has a bad day at work, and goes home and takes it out on the wife and kids. He tells the cops, "Sorry, I was really stressed out"..
Should the men currently serving jail time for rape file to have their cases reviewed? After all, hormones can make you do crazy things..
Hmm?
I think a precedent has been set here... Let's think this through...
A woman says "No" to a man. He rapes her anyway. He blames the testosterone.
A husband has a bad day at work, and goes home and takes it out on the wife and kids. He tells the cops, "Sorry, I was really stressed out"..
Should the men currently serving jail time for rape file to have their cases reviewed? After all, hormones can make you do crazy things..
Hmm?
She Should have done that BEFORE she killed her little babies.
I guess abortion is moving up to 9,19,29 YEARS old. And obviously has great support in this world.
Same here. ONE He/Him/male/MAN to stand up to the evil........And we should not know this. His life is in danger now, they are going to want to abort him.
Here’s a fantastic take on this whole awful situation from a very good young Pastor: