Modern Relationships and Lindsey Clancy Case. 3 Children Strangled. Overwhelming Support From Females and Male Backlash.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
If you are not going to follow the trial best to not pronounce a verdict then.

I wasn't even on the jury, so I won't be pronouncing anything outside my limited opinion. I'm not even speaking outside general principals since I haven't read this thread or know others "verdicts."


Does this apply to the case?

God said,
5And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man's brother will I require the life of man. 6Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.
Genesis 9
 
If you are not going to follow the trial best to not pronounce a verdict then.
Guilty. There is no doubt.

Three little babies murdered. And she did it. No question.


Lock her up for life. A nice cozy daisy field or an ice cold prison for life. She should never be out of custody....EVER.
 
This is arguably the biggest story of the past decade.

Evil is now good. Those poor little kids!!!!!

We Don't hear a word about their horror, but everything is about the murderer and her justified murdering of those parasites.

That's right, I said it, those poor kids are rendered to nothing but parasites in todays world.

Yes, sadly that's how a lot of pro-death parents look at them.
At WVU I wrote argumentative papers on that topic. They were responses to Margaret Sanger and Peter Singer's writings.

Peter Singer said, They are not persons," leading to the conclusion that "the life of a newborn is of less value than the life of a pig, a dog, or a chimpanzee."
He promoted the philosophical outcomes of Darwinian Evil-lutionism.

Margaret Sanger received awards from Adolph Hitler. Even wicked churches in America supported state enforced sterilization and eugenics. Her Birth Control organization name was later changed to Planned Barenhood./Parenthood.
Here's a good documentary. One of the chapters is devoted to this topic. You might want to bookmark it to watch in segments because of length. It's all quite interesting except for the Builderburg chapter near the end.




 
I wasn't even on the jury, so I won't be pronouncing anything outside my limited opinion. I'm not even speaking outside general principals since I haven't read this thread or know others "verdicts."


Does this apply to the case?

God said,
5And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man's brother will I require the life of man. 6Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.
Genesis 9

No it does not, we are not in ancient Israel ........ morality, legality and justice are distinct even though they do overlap, the USA is not a theocracy but this man along with others is working very hard to make it happen perhaps you can join the movement.

wilson.JPG
 
Guilty. There is no doubt.

Three little babies murdered. And she did it. No question.


Lock her up for life. A nice cozy daisy field or an ice cold prison for life. She should never be out of custody....EVER.

Here this is what you are looking for... Wilson2.JPG

He will fix all the laws for you and should anyone in your circle develop Dementia and suffer

from Visual Hallucinations and/or Auditory Hallucinations which Dementia patients do suffer,

I am sure they (the Christian N.) will have Exorcism Stations in every county to deal with the onset

of these symptoms.

Better yet maybe this movement will have a "show trial" and condemn these geriatric people as "witches" ......Salem could be a model. yes I saw those cells, standing room only if you were too poor to pay for the better accommodation.

No need for foundational legal principles, like innocent til proven guilty and proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

It will be great!
 
Here this is what you are looking for... View attachment 296003

He will fix all the laws for you and should anyone in your circle develop Dementia and suffer

from Visual Hallucinations and/or Auditory Hallucinations which Dementia patients do suffer,

I am sure they (the Christian N.) will have Exorcism Stations in every county to deal with the onset

of these symptoms.

Better yet maybe this movement will have a "show trial" and condemn these geriatric people as "witches" ......Salem could be a model. yes I saw those cells, standing room only if you were too poor to pay for the better accommodation.

No need for foundational legal principles, like innocent til proven guilty and proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

It will be great!

No thanks. I'm not a Reformed.


I have no interest in reading this thread other than one of the opening questions that I already answered.
Apparently the media was successful in polarizing America yet another time with one tragic crime while accomplishing nothing of value.

All the while there are members on here who have saved children's lives from emotionally violent adults.
Their experiences do not matter when news pundants stir things up.
 
No thanks. I'm not a Reformed.


I have no interest in reading this thread other than one of the opening questions that I already answered.
Apparently the media was successful in polarizing America yet another time with one tragic crime while accomplishing nothing of value.

All the while there are members on here who have saved children's lives from emotionally violent adults.
Their experiences do not matter when news pundants stir things up.


Gotta hand to the most brainwashed, those who see and harp on everything as Left (Liberal)/Right dichotomy.

I would say the company one keeps is just as problematic as the media, actually probably more so, people tend to seek out those who confirm their bias.
Be careful.
 
Those poor little babies! I cannot believe "the topic" is not about what THEY went through.

But, I am a man. I need to be bashed and questioned as if I am worse than a MURDERER.

Didn't you make a post about men being objective and yet your posts are not about the case and the application of the law but

rather the use of outrage (emotion) to override logic and reason.

Seems to me the women have employed reason / logic /evidence more frequently on this thread than the men, they like to post the outrage and ramblings of social media influencers.
 
You know, I have thought from the beginning of this thread, that the actual topic is 'lets bash women and here is an actual excuse we can use as a reason; meet Mrs Clancy

And the irony is not lost on us>> the women on this thread...... it is the men who have appealed to emotion/outrage far more than the women.

One has to wonder if this thread would have been created if it had been a man charged. :rolleyes:

And as you have shown, men have done their fair share of killing their families.

Not sure if this is accurate but it is a very high percentage

Percentage of Perpetrators: Research shows that roughly 91% to 95% of familicide perpetrators are men. [1, 2]
 
Where/When did she say that?
I didnt say she said that. I said men generally don't rush to defend other men that say that.

And you and everybody else gets the point. Trying to bog people down in rhetorical technicalitites isn't going to change that.
 
I didnt say she said that. I said men generally don't rush to defend other men that say that.

And you and everybody else gets the point. Trying to bog people down in rhetorical technicalitites isn't going to change that.

No one makes that statement ever, guilty or innocent,

and it has nothing to do with this case and the application of the law.