On the other hand, here is a physician's opinion.
I happened to listen last week.
She has traveled to Europe to be a keynote speaker at a midwives conference.
Modern Relationships and Lindsey Clancy Case. 3 Children Strangled. Overwhelming Support From Females and Male Backlash.
- Thread starter Lightbeamrider
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
On the other hand, here is a physician's opinion.
I happened to listen last week.
She has traveled to Europe to be a keynote speaker at a midwives conference.
I answered but not given perhaps the simple answer you were hoping?
The media sold us on the lie that there's an us vs them either mother or child, pro choice or prolife standard set mantra that must be adhered to.
There's no perfect answer to every situation.
The more you know, the more questions you'll have.
It is a simple answer.
You said you are very pro life.
That was a very simple statement.
I asked if you believed abortion was permitted if a mother's life was at risk, she would die,if she carried to term.
You are unable to give a simple answer.
And the alleged physician you allegedly spoke with was incorrect.
Did you know that miscarriages are usually the result of:
A. Prenatal health conditions of the child
B. Nutritional deficiencies
C. Long term use of prescribed hormonal birth control?
The overwhelming majority of abortions are for the reason of birth control.
Drs like the one below are the greedy devils who make the call 100% for the death of the children. Google and AI searches are reflection of the overwhelming pharma/surgical/hospital propaganda.
I'm against the prenatal tests like ultrasound, sticking needles in and rupturing the amniotic sack. The last woman I visited in the hospital wanted to save her pregnancy. She was promiscuous and on birth control until premenopause. Now she wants to keep the child from a man who she had no contact with. The test ruptured the sack so she lived at the hospital as they kept replacing the water.
The child developed to near term and was lost despite full time care of the mother and child at the children's hospital.
Your question assumes that the pediatrician/obgyn/hospital techs can prematurely predict the outcome of a pregnancy and determine the child's fate.
I'm against the assumption that immoral people who have financial incentives are the people who say yes or nay to anyone's life.
I already said I was pro life. That goes for BOTH mother and child.
As a prolife man, I suggest that mothers avoid people like this Dr and go with home births accompanied by prolife midwives who will not harm the babies with hospital protocols.
I forgot to put a part D on the previous list.
That would be prenatal medical treatments.
Looking at the medical biased list that came up on your AI search, it brings to mind the United Nations prenatal medical care offered to black African countries. The UN is known for sending teams of Drs and nurses who under WHO injected women with vaccines. The cocktail was specially made for inducing spontaneous abortions. The AI is correct that it depends upon demographic locations.
I know that you are not the one who came up with those specific search results. Let's keep in mind that search results are a compilation of what is financially backed and popular mainstream medical industrial protocols.
They will generally reflect Malthusian philosophy.
Well, you did just make that up. Much as I despise Healy's policies and hope she's voted out, the visits are VOLUNTARY.
"Governor Healey is proposing $2 million to expand Welcome Family, a voluntary and free home visiting program that supports parents and caregivers in the weeks after a baby is born."
Facts matter.
Medical procedure is what was being discussed.
Ergo,medical information relative to pregnancy and necessity for termination,where those arise,are categorized as medical procedures.
Irrelevant.
Again,irrelevant.
You are "very pro life", but cannot answer a very simple direct question.
You obfuscate the question and very simple answer,if one has been very pro life all their life, with data you believe relevant.
While attempting to dismiss the AI data as "medical biased". After the medical bias you repeatedly posted.
You cannot answer the question.
If the mothers life would be lost should she carry to term, do you believe an abortion, the only medical option for whatever reason doctors found, is permissable?
You cannot answer. You refuse to answer.
Because you cannot answer,with a yes or no.
That's usual for radical pro life persons.
They're all about the baby.
Not the mother,the woman.
You must give birth! No matter what.
But she'll die if she carries to term. Which is a very real medical scenario today,still.
*Crickets,and excuses to avoid an answer*
Because they don't have the courage of their convictions.
They have obfuscation.
Thank you for your time.
Reading through the thread, I see most people want Clancy to face the appropriate murder charges. Who are the "many" you're talking about that don't want her to be held accountable? Can you name them?
Look friend, I understand that many women suffered from many abuses and things beyond their control. It can be unbearable. My own Mom suffered from unspeakable harm from her second husband and his kid. The stress of not being able to save her nearly killed me.
That doesn't mean that its radical to be for the lives of mothers and their children.
Over 90% of the population of America used to believe that.
America 1960s there was an organized demonic attack of the sexual revolution, birth control, divorce, communism, amorality, and the world's biggest spy agency combined forces. THAT is what was radical. They actually called themselves Radicals.
They used information warfare philosophical manipulation to control the arguments and deceive masses. My own pastor who was against those was convinced by much of the propaganda in the 90s. He decided that the preborn had no right to existence until after emerging from their mother's birth canal. Eventually that nondenominational pastor became a Universalist. He was high IQ and an intellectual, but I would not agree with his change of mind.
What was a technique they used to justify abortion/infanticide ?
They framed the argument in such a way to:
A. Divide men from women
B. Divide mothers from their children
C. Undermine the moral institutions that strengthen the nation, churches and families
D. Control the narrative
One of the ways they did this was to frame it as either the Child dies OR the Mother dies!
"Now who are you going to choose!??"
This is how those devils framed the question.
1st, the baby doesn't have a choice.
Unlike what Jesus said in no uncertain terms, the baby is just a clump of cells, no different than a tumor that needs removed by the substitute god, the medical doctor. They love playing god because they can then call it a C Section, slice the mother's bellies open at convenience and go out to play. That's playing god. They choose life or death, well death because that pays 8 to 10 times more so they choose death. The majority are motivated by their love of money. That's why they went into medi-$in.
They came up with only their hypothetical scenario, kill the baby or kill the mother.
They don't like the other possibilities such as
A. Let them both survive by staying out of the natural process that the real God designed.
B. Trial for mass murder, where due process o curs, the evidence is considered by 12 jurors and if found guilty, the MDs are publicly executed.
Jesus described what should occur if it happened in His kingdom, something involving a mill stone.
We don't have to agree on everything, but I hope I am clear on my views on the lives of babies, mothers and the mass murderers that some sadly trust.
No,we don't have to agree on this.
I don't profess to be pro life while reworking the propaganda of Operation Rescue A terrorist organization,at that.
I also don't believe in ignoring medical facts and case studies.
I also don't say I'm pro life while cloaking my actual ideology in protracted obfuscation. You're pro baby. While women,in your ideology,who don't want to be put at high risk in pregnancy that may necessitate termination,should have abstained from sex on order to avoid the conundrum
In real words,a woman should die rather than have an abortion to save her life.Blame the woman so the woman is expendable because sperm has primacy.
You're not pro life!
Now I understand why you excused the cracked one who literally thought you were the dead artist BibRoss.To the point they made x fool of themselves denying all evidence to the contrary.
And then laughed at the fact,he's really dead.
You're both not in your proper consciousness.
I don't profess to be pro life while reworking the propaganda of Operation Rescue A terrorist organization,at that.
I also don't believe in ignoring medical facts and case studies.
I also don't say I'm pro life while cloaking my actual ideology in protracted obfuscation. You're pro baby. While women,in your ideology,who don't want to be put at high risk in pregnancy that may necessitate termination,should have abstained from sex on order to avoid the conundrum
In real words,a woman should die rather than have an abortion to save her life.Blame the woman so the woman is expendable because sperm has primacy.
You're not pro life!
Now I understand why you excused the cracked one who literally thought you were the dead artist BibRoss.To the point they made x fool of themselves denying all evidence to the contrary.
And then laughed at the fact,he's really dead.
You're both not in your proper consciousness.
I am not surprised on this with regards to the pill.
When did I laugh at Bob Ross' death?
I simply took the thread less seriously. It did not bother me if I was the brunt of a silly insult or not was my point at the time. I have much more serious issues to deal with here that actually affects my life. That's what I said to Eli. The thread asking for prayer and my wellbeing was a blessing.
Thank you for standing up for a friend and your prayers.
Bad comedians only care about feeding their ego, that is what I saw in that thread.