And I'm even more surprised you do not believe...without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sin.
Were the sins of the paralytic forgiven? Yes. By Jesus? Yes. Before the Cross? Yes
hmm, imagine that.
God orchestrated the whole thing my friend even before the foundations of the earth.
And?
So in perspective...your calling God a murderer.
God is the transcendent creator, which is relevant for two reasons: 1) God has the right of authorship, and 2) he has the right of lordship. The logic of authorship means that if I create something with my own hands, I have the right to destroy it if I want. The logic of lordship mean that since God is lord over all, he has the right to put someone to death.
Neither the leaders of Israel nor the leaders of Rome have these rights. They assume the right to inflict capital punishment under the pretext that they are working for God, but only when a person has committed a capital offense. Jesus did not commit a capital offense, so his execution was unjust.
Let me leave you with this...
Joseph of the old testament said.....what you ment for evil....God ment for good.
Scripture tells us.....for the glory set before him jesus endured the cross. Jesus endured the cross he didnt die because of it.
I've posted real proof. Gods hand all over that event and as Paul says he died according to scripture.
Viewing the crucifixion as judgement in 70 AD is a lie and perversion. Shame on those that believe this lie.
The crucifixion was a prophecy to be fulfilled. Not a random act of rejection.
You are confusing God's will and judgment with human will and judgment. The two aren't necessarily the same. Your Genesis example is a good illustration. Jesus taught his disciples to look at things from two points of view: the heavenly and the earthly. He tells Nicodemus that if he doesn't believe the word of Jesus when he speaks about earthly things, how will he believe Jesus when he talks about heavenly things?
Joseph reveals his awareness of both points of view, From the earthly perspective, his brothers meant evil, but from the heavenly perspective God meant good. Both things are true at the same time. The same is true of the crucifixion. From the earthly perspective, the crucifixion was an evil act, but from a heavenly perspective, God meant it for good.
Paul recognizes this in Romans 11:11-12
11 I say then, they did not stumble so as to fall, did they? May it never be! But by their transgression salvation
has come to the Gentiles, to make them jealous. 12 Now if their transgression is riches for the world and their failure is riches for the Gentiles, how much more will their fulfillment be!
Here the Apostle speaks of the crucifixion from the two perspectives I mentioned earlier. From the earthly perspective, Israel transgressed; they killed the Messiah. Given this to be true, Paul asks a rhetorical question, "they [Israel] didn't stumble so as to fall did they? May it never be." From the earthly perspective, they transgressed, and it was such a great transgression that there is/was doubt whether God would destroy them. From the earthly perspective, they committed evil.
But from the heavenly perspective, Paul says, "by their transgression salvation
has come to the Gentiles. What Israel meant for evil; God meant for good. Their transgression is riches for the world, and their failure is riches for the Gentiles. What they meant for evil God meant for good.
It is not wrong to say that Israel was unjust. If Paul thinks they were unjust, then so do I. It is truthful to admit when someone does wrong, even if God means it for good.
Hear me on this. We only know that God did good at the cross because he and the apostles said so. Without their testimony, we would never know it was meant for good. Just looking at the situation, all we see/saw is evil being performed. Without the revealed heavenly perspective, we would never have known that the cross was meant for good. A fair evaluation of the situation called for only one conclusion. Israel committed a grave abomination against the Lord.