W
wyler
Guest
How do you idealistically resolve conflicts?
Idealistically everyone involved keeps calm and we have a discussion that results in a concession that one party was wrong, or all parties agree to disagree and let it lie.
How do you react to someone who is being volatile or emotional when they argue?
The key thing for me is not allowing myself to be influenced by the other person, if I let them make me angry then it stops being an argument and becomes an exchange of nasty insults.
I usually try and keep presenting facts, if I am certain my position is a strong one then usually the strength of the argument makes the other person stop and think because they need to order their thoughts before they can throw back an angry repsonse, and in the time it takes for them to think of one they realise my view is at least valid to some extent and they calm down a bit, at that point the whole exchange becomes more civil and can be brought to a nice end.
If they keep on being volatile then then all I can do is walk away, and most times the other person knows they were in the wrong for being so hostile about whatever it was.
Is Being quiet and passively avoiding people uglier than being confrontational?
One no better than the other in my opinion.
In the short term passive might seem better as being confrontational generally creates more and more confrontation, but being passive doesn't resolve anything, it just stops it going any further.
The problem with being passive is that it is so deceptive, it makes people think they are doing the right thing, where they are actualy doing themsleves tremendous damage, because being passive just removes you from the entire process of growing as a person.
Being confrontiational may be ugly, but it is a road with a destination, if you survive it you generally learn self-control and end up with a better life, it's just a very ugly life up too that point.
People who are passive are often never reach the tipping point, and so their lives can't move beyond the same problems.